Skip to main content

Set operations in a data model supporting complex objects

  • Session 7: Database Programming Languages
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Database Technology — EDBT '90 (EDBT 1990)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 416))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Class creation by set operations has largely been ignored in the literature. Precise semantics of set operations on complex objects require a clear distinction between the dual notions of a set and a type, both of which are present in a class. Our paper fills this gap by presenting a framework for executing set-theoretic operations on the class construct. The proposed set operations determine both the type description of the derived class as well as its set membership. For the former, we develop inheritance rules for property characteristics such as single- versus multi-valued and required versus optional. For the later, we borrow the object identity concept from data modeling research. Our framework allows for property inheritance among classes that are not necessarily is a related.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abiteboul, S. and Hull, R. IFO: A Formal Semantic Database Model. ACM TODS, Dec. 1987, vol. 12, issue 4, 525–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Atkinson, M. P., and Buneman, O. P., Types and Persistence In Database Programming Languages, ACM Computing Surveys, Vol. 19, No. 2, June 87, 105–190.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brachman, R. J., What IS-A is and isn't: An Analysis of Taxonomic Links in Semantic Networks, Computer, Oct. 83, 30–36.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hammer M. and McLeod D.J. Database Description with SDM: A Semantic Data Model. ACM TODS, vol. 6, no. 3, Sept. 1981, 351–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hull, R. and King, R. Semantic Database Modeling: Survey, Applications and Research Issues, ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 19, no. 3, Sept. 1987, 201–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Khoshafian, S.N. and Copeland G.P., Object Identity, Sep. 1986, Proc. OOPSLA'86, ACM, 406–416.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mylopoulos, J., Bernstein, P.A., and Wong H.K.T. A Language Facility for Designing Database-Intensive Applications, June 1980, vol. 5, issue 2, ACM TODS, 185–207.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rundensteiner, E. A., and Bic, L., Aggregates in Possibilistic Databases, VLDB'89, Aug. 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rundensteiner, E. A., and Bic, L., Set Operations in Semantic Data Models, Uni. of Cal, Irvine, Technical Report No. 89-22, June 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Su, Y. W. S., Modeling Integrated Manufacturing Data with SAM*, Computer 19, 1, 1986, 34–49.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

François Bancilhon Constantino Thanos Dennis Tsichritzis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rundensteiner, E.A., Bic, L. (1990). Set operations in a data model supporting complex objects. In: Bancilhon, F., Thanos, C., Tsichritzis, D. (eds) Advances in Database Technology — EDBT '90. EDBT 1990. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 416. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0022177

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0022177

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-52291-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46948-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics