A semantic view of explanation

  • Justus Meier
Technical Papers
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 671)


Explaining expert systems requires explicit and rich representations of the underlying knowledge. As a step towards reaching adequate representation models have been proposed as the basis for the knowledge processing needed for explanation. The main problem is the description of problem solving processes. If that is achieved explanation methods can be conceived as quite general, semantic operations on models.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    J. Angele et al., KARL: An executable language for the conceptual model, in: Proc. 6th Banff Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop, Banff 1991, 1–20.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    J.A. Breuker et al., Model-Driven Knowledge Acquisition: Interpretation Models, Deliverable task A1, Esprit Project 1088, 1987.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    S. Heider, G. Wickler, Tracing von MODEL-K und OFFICE-PLAN als Grundlage für dynamisches Erklären, DIAMOD Bericht Nr.6, GMD 1991.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    H. Horacek, Exploiting conversational implicature for generating concise explanations, EACL 1991, 191–193.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    H. Horacek, An integrative view of text planning, DIAMOD-Bericht, Universität Bielefeld 1992.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    M. Linster, Declarative Problem Solving Procedures as a Basis for Knowledge Acquisition: A First Proposal, Technical Report 448, Arbeitspapiere der GMD, St. Augustin 1990.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    K. McKeown, M. Wish, K. Matthews, Tailoring Explanations for the User, 794–798.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    J. Möller, Towards Declarative Programming of Conceptual Models, to appear in: Proc. 2. Workshop Informationssysteme und Künstliche Intelligenz, Ulm 1992.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    B.S. Müller, M. Sprenger, Dialogabhängige Erklärungsstrategien für modellbasierte Expertensysteme — Das Projekt DIAMOD, DIAMOD Bericht Nr. 2, GMD 1991.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    R. Neches, W.R. Swartout, J. Moore, Explainable (and maintainable) expert systems, IJCAI 1985, 382–388.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    C. Paris, Combining Discourse Strategies to Generate Descriptions to Users Along a Naive/Expert Spectrum, IJCAI 1987, 626–632.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    G. Schreiber et al., Designing Architectures for Knowledge-Level Reflection, REFLECT Report RFL/UvA/III.1/4, University of Amsterdam 1991.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    M. Sprenger, Explanation Strategies for KADS-based Expert Systems, DIAMOD Bericht Nr.10, GMD 1991.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    W.R. Swartout, S.W. Smoliar, Explanation: A Source of Guidance for Knowledge Representation, in: K. Morik (ed.), Knowledge Representation and Organization in Machine Learning, Berlin 1989, 1–16.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    A. Voß et al., Operationalization of a synthetic problem, REFLECT Report RFL/GMD/I.2/5, GMD 1990.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    B.J. Wielinga, J.A. Breuker, Models of Expertise, ECAI 1986, 497–509.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Justus Meier
    • 1
  1. 1.Fakultät für Linguistik und LiteraturwissenschaftUniversität BielefeldBielefeldGermany

Personalised recommendations