Advertisement

No improvement without feedback: Experiences from goal-oriented measurement at Schlumberger

  • Frank van Latum
  • Markka Oivo
  • Barbara Hoisl
  • Günther Ruhe
Metrics session
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1149)

Abstract

Schlumberger is an international technology oriented company and started its company wide software process improvement program in 1989. This industrial experience paper describes how goal-oriented measurement was established and which role feedback sessions played as a critical success factor within this process.

By feedback sessions we mean well-organized, structured meetings between the project team and the measurement team. Main objective is to review the data collected so far and to analyze and interpret it. The interpretations derived are fed back both into the software development process and into the measurement process. Thus, feedback sessions serve multiple purposes: they maintain motivation and momentum in the measurement program, they ensure that the interpretations derived from the collected data are correct, and they allow the identification of small-scale changes that can be immediately implemented in order to improve both the measurement and the software development process. In addition to that, the interpretations derived from the data allow identification of larger-scale changes to the software development process which can be implemented and validated in subsequent software projects.

We describe practical experiences with feedback sessions based on two projects: the Omega 2010 project for development of both hardware and software for a point-of-sale system with quality focus on reliability and reusability, and the DEMP project with quality focus on interrupt handling. The experience report will give detailed answers to pragmatic questions, such as, how feedback sessions were prepared, how they were performed, which results were derived, and which lessons were learned for future projects. As a main conclusion, feedback sessions are characterized as the back-bone of any industrial measurement program.

Keywords

Goal-oriented measurement Schlumberger experience report feedback session analysis and interpretation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [BCR94a]
    Victor R. Basili, Gianluigi Caldiera, and H. Dieter Rombach. Experience Factory. In John J. Marciniak, editor. Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, volume 1, pages 469–476. John Wiley & Sons, 1994.Google Scholar
  2. [BCR94b]
    Victor R. Basili, Gianluigi Caldiera, and H. Dieter Rombach. Goal Question Metric Paradigm. In John J. Marciniak, editor, Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, volume 1, pages 528–532. John Wiley & Sons, 1994.Google Scholar
  3. [BW84]
    Victor R. Basili and David M. Weiss. A methodology for collecting valid software engineering data. IEEE 10 Transactions on Software Engineering, SE-10(6): 728–738, November 1984.Google Scholar
  4. [GHW]
    C. Gresse, B. Hoisl, and J. Wüst. A process model for GQM-based measurement. Report STTI-95-04-E, Software-Technologie-Transfer Initiative Kaiserslautern, 1995.Google Scholar
  5. [GRR94]
    H. Günther, H.D. Rombach, and G. Ruhe. Kontinuierliche Qualitätsverbesserung in der Software-Entwicklung — Erfahrungen bei der Allianz Lebensversicherungs-AG (in German). Wirtschaftsinformatik 38(96), 160–171.Google Scholar
  6. [nas94]
    Software measurement guidebook. Technical Report SEL-94-002, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt MD 20771, July 1994.Google Scholar
  7. [Oiv94]
    M. Oivo. Quantitative management of software production using object-oriented models, VTT Publications, Oulu, 1994Google Scholar
  8. [Rom91]
    H. Dieter Rombach. Practical benefits of goal-oriented measurement. In N. Fenton and B. Littlewood, editors, Software Reliability and Metrics, pages 217–235. Elsevier Applied Science, London, 1991.Google Scholar
  9. [vL94]
    F. van Latum. The customized establishment of a measurement program in Schlumberger RPS, 1994.Google Scholar
  10. [vLHO+]
    F. van Latum, B. Hoisl, M. Oivo, H. D. Rombach, and G. Ruhe. Shifting towards goal-oriented measurement — experience of Schlumberger, submitted to IEEE Software (1996).Google Scholar
  11. [vS95]
    R. van Solingen. Goal-oriented software measurement in practice. Master thesis report, May 1995.Google Scholar
  12. [WR94]
    H. Wohlwend and S. Rosenbaum. Schlumberger's software improvement program. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 20, 1994.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank van Latum
    • 1
    • 6
  • Markka Oivo
    • 2
    • 6
  • Barbara Hoisl
    • 3
    • 5
  • Günther Ruhe
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Dräger Medical ElectronicsBestThe Netherlands
  2. 2.VTT ElectronicsOuluFinland
  3. 3.Hewlett-Packard GmbHBöblingenGermany
  4. 4.Fraunhofer-Einrichtung IESEKaiserslauternGermany
  5. 5.Software-Technologie-Transfer-InitiativeKaiserslautern
  6. 6.Schlumberger

Personalised recommendations