Advertisement

Extensional models for polymorphism

  • Val Breazu-Tannen
  • Thierry Coquand
Session CFLP 6 Types, Polymorphism And Abstract Data Type Specifications
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 250)

Abstract

We present a general method for constructing extensional models for the polymorphic lambda calculus—the polymorphic extensional collapse. The method yields models that satisfy additional, computationally motivated constraints like having only two polymorphic booleans and having only the numerals as polymorphic integers. Moreover the method yields models that prove that the polymorphic lambda calculus can be conservatively added to arbitrary algebraic data type specifications, even with complete transfer of the computational power to the added data types.

Keywords

Proof System Conservative Extension Type Assignment Lambda Calculus Typing Judgment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. [Barendregt 1984]
    H. P. Barendregt. The Lambda Calculus: Its Syntax and Semantics. Volume 103 of Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, North-Holland, Amsterdam, second edition, 1984.Google Scholar
  2. [Breazu-Tannen]
    V. Breazu-Tannen. Ph.D. thesis, MIT. Expected Feb.1987.Google Scholar
  3. [Breazu-Tannen & Meyer 1987]
    V. Breazu-Tannen and A. R. Meyer. Computable values can be classical. In Proceedings of the 14th Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, ACM, 1987. To appear.Google Scholar
  4. [Breazu-Tannen 1986]
    V. Breazu-Tannen. Communication in the Types electronic forum (xx.lcs.mit.edu), July 29th. 1986. Unpublished.Google Scholar
  5. [Bruce & Meyer 1984]
    K. B. Bruce and A. R. Meyer. The semantics of second order polymorphic lambda calculus. In G. Kahn, D. B. MacQueen, and G. Plotkin, editors, Semantics of Data Types, pages 131–144, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, June 1984.Google Scholar
  6. [Burstall et al. 1980]
    R. M. Burstall, D.B. MacQueen, and D.T. Sanella. Hope: an experimental applicative language. In LISP Conference, pages 136–143, Stanford University Computer Science Department, 1980.Google Scholar
  7. [Cardelli & Wegner 1985]
    L. Cardelli and P. Wegner. On understanding types, data abstraction and polymorphism. Computing Surveys, 17(4):471–522, 1985.Google Scholar
  8. [Cardelli 1985]
    L. Cardelli. Amber. In Combinators and functional programming languages, Proceedings of the 13th Summer School of the LITP, Le Val D'Ajol, Vosges, France, May 1985.Google Scholar
  9. [Coquand 1986]
    T. Coquand. Communication in the Types electronic forum (xx.lcs.mit.edu), April 14th. 1986. Unpublished.Google Scholar
  10. [Fairbairn 1982]
    J. Fairbairn. Ponder and its type system. Tech. Rep. 31, Computer Laboratory, Univ. of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, November 1982.Google Scholar
  11. [Fortune et al. 1983]
    S. Fortune, D. Leivant, and M. O'Donnell. The expressiveness of simple and second-order type structures. Journal of the ACM, 30(1):151–185, January 1983.Google Scholar
  12. [Gandy 1956]
    R. O. Gandy. On the axiom of extensionality—Part I. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 21, 1956.Google Scholar
  13. [Girard 1972]
    J.-Y. Girard. Interprétation fonctionelle et élimination des coupures dans l'arithmétique d'ordre supérieure. Ph.D. thesis, Université Paris VII, 1972.Google Scholar
  14. [Gordon et al. 1979]
    M. J. Gordon, R. Milner, and C. P. Wadsworth. Edinburgh LCF. Volume 78 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1979.Google Scholar
  15. [Hindley & Longo 1980]
    R. Hindley and G. Longo. Lambda-calculus models and extensionality. Zeitschrift für Mathematische Logic und Grundlagen der Mathematik, 26:289–310, 1980.Google Scholar
  16. [Klop 1980]
    J. W. Klop. Combinatory reduction systems. Tract 129, Mathematical Center, Amsterdam, 1980.Google Scholar
  17. [Leivant 1983]
    D. Leivant. Reasoning about functional programs and complexity classes associated with type disciplines. In 24th Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 460–469, IEEE, 1983.Google Scholar
  18. [Matthews 1985]
    D. C. J. Matthews. Poly manual. Tech. Rep. 63, Computer Laboratory, Univ. of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, 1985.Google Scholar
  19. [Meyer et al. 1987]
    A. R. Meyer, J. C. Mitchell, E. Moggi, and R. Statman. Empty types in polymorphic λ-calculus. In Proceedings of the 14th Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, ACM, 1987. To appear.Google Scholar
  20. [Meyer 1982]
    Albert R. Meyer. What is a model of the lambda calculus? Information and Control, 52(1):87–122, January 1982.Google Scholar
  21. [Meyer 1986]
    A. R. Meyer. Communication in the Types electronic forum (xx.lcs.mit.edu), February 7th. 1986. Unpublished.Google Scholar
  22. [Mitchell & Meyer 1985]
    J. C. Mitchell and A.R. Meyer. Second-order logic relations (extended abstract). In R. Parikh, editor, Logics of Programs, pages 225–236, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, June 1985.Google Scholar
  23. [Mitchell 1986a]
    J. C. Mitchell. Personal communication, August. 1986. Unpublished.Google Scholar
  24. [Mitchell 1986b]
    J. C. Mitchell. A type-inference approach to reduction properties and semantics of polymorphic expressions. In LISP Conference, pages 308–319, ACM, New York, August 1986.Google Scholar
  25. [Moggi 1986a]
    E. Moggi. Communication in the Types electronic forum (xx.lcs.mit.edu), February 10th. 1986. Unpublished.Google Scholar
  26. [Moggi 1986b]
    E. Moggi. Communication in the Types electronic forum (xx.lcs.mit.edu), July 23rd. 1986. Unpublished.Google Scholar
  27. [Nikhil 1984]
    R. S. Nikhil. An incremental, strongly typed database query language. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, August 1984. Available as tech. rep. MS-CIS-85-02.Google Scholar
  28. [Reynolds 1985]
    J. C. Reynolds. Three approaches to type structure. In TAPSOFT advanced seminar on the role of semantics in software development, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985.Google Scholar
  29. [Scedrov 1986]
    A. Scedrov. Semantical methods for polymorphism. 1986. Unpublished manuscript, Univ. of Pennsylvania, July 1986.Google Scholar
  30. [Statman 1980]
    R. Statman. On the existence of closed terms in the typed λ-calculus. In J. P. Seldin and R. Hindley, editors, To H. B. Curry: Essays in Combinatory Logic, Lambda Calculus, and Formalism, pages 511–534, Academic Press, New York, 1980.Google Scholar
  31. [Statman 1981]
    R. Statman. Number theoretic functions computable by polymorphic programs. In 22nd Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 279–282, IEEE, 1981.Google Scholar
  32. [Statman 1983]
    R. Statman. λ-definable functionals and β η conversion. Arch. math. Logik, 23:21–26, 1983.Google Scholar
  33. [Troelstra (ed.) 1973]
    A. S. Troelstra (ed.). Metamathematical investigation of intuititionistic arithmetic and analysis. Volume 344 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, 1973.Google Scholar
  34. [Turner 1985]
    D. A. Turner. Miranda: a non-strict functional language with polymorphic types. In J.-P. Jouannaud, editor, Functional programming languages and computer architecture, pages 1–16, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, September 1985.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Val Breazu-Tannen
    • 1
  • Thierry Coquand
    • 2
  1. 1.MIT Laboratory for Computer ScienceCambridgeUSA
  2. 2.INRIA Domaine de VoluceauRocquencourtFrance

Personalised recommendations