Skip to main content

Relations between land surface properties: Altitude, slope and curvature

  • Part I Terrain Representation And Analysis
  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Process Modelling and Landform Evolution

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences ((LNEARTH,volume 78))

Abstract

The land surface is studied in terms of point properties, linear (flow-line and break-line) properties and areal properties. These show considerable structure and within-region predictability: the land surface is not (uni-)fractal but varies along multiple statistical dimensions. The simplest point properties are altitude itself and the first and second order derivatives, slope and curvature, of the altitude surface. Two components of each derivative are of proven value: it is best to separate the vertical (slope gradient and gradient change) from the horizontal (aspect and aspect change). The relationships between these five, some of which are not intuitive, are discussed here with illustrations from Germany.

Slope gradient usually varies with altitude, but not monotonically. The strength of the relationship varies, and in dissected plateaus the overall correlation is negative. The effects of mesoclimate (slope climate) mean that geomorphological processes vary with aspect, and there are a number of hypotheses of how this might affect gradient. Such signals are masked by considerable scatter on gradient-aspect plots, and it is important to use appropriate tools for relating linear to circular variables. Surface curvature (convexity taken as positive) is separated into vertical (profile, change of gradient) and horizontal (plan, change of aspect) components. The relationship between these is almost universally positive, but very weak: correlations are around +0.2, whether or not transformations to reduce the effects of extreme values are applied. As might be expected, profile convexity almost universally increases with altitude, although the correlation is rarely stronger than that of gradient with altitude. Plan convexity is least varied (closest to zero) on steep slopes; extreme but real values are found on floodplains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aandahl, A.R. (1948): The characterisation of slope positions and their influence on the total N content of a few virgin soils in Western Iowa. Soil Science Society of America, Proceedings 13: 449–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsch, D., and H. Liedtke (1980): Principles, scientific value and practical applicability of the geomorphological map of the Federal Republic of Germany at the scale of 1:25,000 (GMK 25) and 1/100,000 (GMK 100). Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie N.F. Supplement-Band 36: 296–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaszczynski, J.S. (1997): Landform characterization with GIS. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 63: 183–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breed, C.S., and T. Grow (1979): Morphology and distribution of dunes in sand seas observed by remote sensing. In McKee, E.D. (ed.) A global study of sand seas. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1052: 253–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D.G., and T.J. Bara (1994): Recognition and reduction of systematic error in elevation and derivative surfaces from 7 1/2-Minute DEMs. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 60: 189–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrara, A., G. Bitelli, and R. Carla (1997): Comparison of techniques for generating DTMs from contour lines. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 11: 451–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, J.R. (1992): The effect of data precision on the calculation of slope and aspect data using gridded DEMs. Cartographica 29: 22–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, K., and B. Tsai (1991): The effect of DEM resolution on slope and aspect mapping. Cartography & GIS 18: 69–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, N.J. (1997): Bin smoothing and summary on scatter plots. Stata Technical Bulletin 37: 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, N.J., and A.R. Brady (1997): Spike plots for histograms, rootograms, and time-series plots. Stata Technical Bulletin 36: 8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crofts, R.S. (1981): Mapping techniques in geomorphology. In Goudie, A. et al. (eds.) Geomorphological Techniques. George Allen & Unwin, London, 66–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, L.F., J.C. Doornkamp, and K.J. Gregory (1965): The description of relief in field studies of soils. Journal of Soil Science 16: 16–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demek, J., and C. Embleton (eds.) (1978): Guide to medium-scale geomorphological mapping. Schweizerbart'sche, Stuttgart, for International Geographical Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Depraetere, C. (1987): Classification automatique interrégionale à partir de MNT issus de la BDZ. Institut Géographique National, Paris, EO/DELI/SCME Rapport 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, I.S. (1972): General geomorphometry, derivatives of altitude, and descriptive statistics. Ch. 2 in Chorley, R.J. (ed.) Spatial analysis in geomorphology. Methuen, London, 17–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, I.S. (1979): An integrated system of terrain analysis and slope mapping. Final Report on Grant DA-ERO-591-73-G0040, Department of Geography, University of Durham, England, 192 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, I.S. (1980): An integrated system of terrain analysis and slope mapping. Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie N.F. Supplement-Band 36: 274–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, I.S. (1984a): Correlation structures and factor analysis in the investigation of data dimensionality: statistical properties of the Wessex land surface, England. Proceedings, International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling '84 v. 1: 98–116, Geogr. Inst., Universität Zürich-Irchel, Zürich, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, I.S. (1984b): Properties of the Wessex land surface: an investigation of dimensionality and the choice of key variables. Durham Geomorphometry Report 8, Department of Geography, University of Durham, England, 131 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, I.S. (1990): General geomorphometry. Ch. 2.3 in Goudie, A. et al. (eds) Geomorphological Techniques (2nd edn), 44–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, I.S. (1998): What do terrain statistics really mean? In Lane, S., Richards, K. and Chandler, J. (eds.) Landform monitoring, modelling and analysis. J. Wiley, Chichester, 119–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, I.S., and C.J. McClean (1995): The land surface is not unifractal: variograms, cirque scale and allometry. Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie N.F. Suppl.-Band 101: 127–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyton, J.R. (1991): Rate-of-change maps. Cartography & GIS 18: 87–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding, E., B. Isacks, M. Barazangi, and C.C. Duncan (1994): How flat is Tibet? Geology 22: 163–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florinsky, I.V. (1996): Quantitative topographic method of fault morphology recognition. Geomorphology 16: 103–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles, P.T., and S.E. Franklin (1996): Comparison of derivative topographic surfaces of a DEM generated from stereoscopic SPOT images with field measurements. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 62: 1165–1171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guth, P.L. (1995): Slope and aspect calculations on gridded DEMs. Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie N.F. Supplement-Band 101: 31–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hormann, K. (1971): Morphometrie der Erdobefläche. Scheriften des Geographischen Instituts der Universität Kiel 36: 178 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinkenberg, B. (1994): A review of methods used to determine the fractal dimension of linear features. Mathematical Geology 26: 23–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krcho, J. (1973): Morphometric analysis of relief on the basis of geometric aspects of field theory. Acta Geographica Universitatis Comenianae, Geographico-physica Nr. 1. Slovak Pedagogical Publishers, Bratislava: 7–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanyon, L.E., and G.F. Hall (1983): Land surface morphology. Soil Science 136: 291–299 & 382–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClean, C.J. (1990): The scale-free and scale-bound properties of land surfaces: fractal analysis and specific geomorphometry from digital terrain models. Ph.D. thesis, University of Durham, Department of Geography: 308 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D.R., and W.E. Dietrich (1992): Channel initiation and the problem of landscape scale. Science 255: 826–830.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, I.D., R.B. Grayson, and A.R. Ladson (1991): Digital terrain modelling: a review of hydrological, geomorphological and biological applications. Hydrological Processes 5: 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nogami, M. (1995): Geomorphometric measures for digital elevation models. Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie N.F. Supplement-Band 101: 53–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennock, D.J., B.J. Zebarth, and E. De Jong (1987): Landform classification and soil distribution in hummocky terrain, Saskatchewan, Canada. Geoderma 40: 297–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrie, G., and T.J.M. Kennie (1990): Terrain modelling in surveying and civil engineering. Whittles, Caithness.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike, R.J. (1987): Information content of planetary terrain: varied effectiveness of parameters for the Earth. Lunar & Planetary Science 18: 778–781.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike, R.J. (1988): Toward geometric signatures for geographic information systems. International Geographic Systems Symposium, Proceedings III: 15–26. NASA, Arlington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, J., and R. Dikau (1998): Extracting geomorphometric attributes and objects from digital elevation models — semantics, methods, future needs. In Dikau, R. and Saurer, H. (eds.) GIS in physical geography, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, J., B. Merz, and R. Dikau (1998): Morphological structure and hydrological process modelling. Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie, Supplement-Band, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shary, P.A. (1995): Land surface in gravity points classification by a complex system of curvatures. Mathematical Geology 27: 373–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skidmore, A.K. (1989): A comparison of techniques for calculating gradient and aspect from a gridded DEM. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 3: 323–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speight, J.G. (1968): Parametric description of land form. In G.A. Stewart (ed.) Land evaluation. Macmillan, Melbourne, 239–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summerfield, M.A. (1991): Subaerial denudation of passive margins: regional elevation versus local relief models. Earth & Planetary Science Letters 102: 406–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, S.M. (1998): The effect of GIS interpolation errors on the use of DEMs in geomorphology. In Lane, S., Richards, K. and Chandler, J. (eds.) Landform monitoring, modelling and analysis. Chichester; J. Wiley, 139–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiong, K. (1992): Morphometry and evolution of fenglin karst in the Shuicheng area, western Guizhou, China. Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie N.F. 36: 227–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, A. (1972): Slopes. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh, 288pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zevenbergen, L.W. and C.R. Thorne (1987): Quantitative analysis of land surface topography. Earth Surface Processes & Landforms 12: 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W., and D.R. Montgomery (1994): DEM grid size, landscape representation, and hydrologic simulations. Water Resources Research 30: 1019–28.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Stefan Hergarten Horst J. Neugebauer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Evans, I.S., Cox, N.J. (1999). Relations between land surface properties: Altitude, slope and curvature. In: Hergarten, S., Neugebauer, H.J. (eds) Process Modelling and Landform Evolution. Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences, vol 78. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0009718

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0009718

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64932-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68307-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics