Skip to main content

Comparative Study Between Alkali-Activated Mortar and Conventional Mortar Towards Sulphuric Acid

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Advances in Structural Engineering (IACESD 2023)

Abstract

The alkali-activated concrete (AAC) is an ecofriendly alternative to ordinary Portland cement (OPC) concrete. AAC reduces carbon emissions by the usage of aluminosilicate materials instead of OPC. The buildings and other concrete structures can be exposed to acids throughout its service life, especially in marine buildings, factories, agricultural, and sewage components. This study aims to the comparison of resistance of AAC and conventional mortar towards sulphuric acid (H2SO4) attack. The materials used for the preparation of AAC mortar specimens are cementitious components and alkaline activators. The cementitious components are GGBS and fly ash as the binding material of ratio 1:9. The alkaline activators used are sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution of 8 M and sodium silicate (Na2SiO3) solution, which has a ratio of 1:2.5. Sulphuric acid of 98% assay is used for preparation of the 5% acid solution. Totally, 9 cubes for AAC and 9 cubes for OPC mortar specimens of size 7 cm × 7 cm × 7 cm were prepared and the specimens were shifted to H2SO4, and the changes have to be observed by visual appearance, mass loss, volume change, pH value, and compressive strength test at the age of 1-month duration. The results suggest that alkali-activated mortar specimens show better performance than OPC mortar specimens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Yang C, Pu X, Wu F (1999) Research on alkali aggregate reaction expansion of alkalislag mortar (in Chinese). J Chin Ceram Soc 27:651–657

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andrew RM (2019) Global CO2 emission from cement production. Earth Syst Sci Data 1928–2018. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-195-2018

  3. Davidovits J (1982) Mineral polymers and methods of making them. Google Patents

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bosoaga A, Masek O, Oakey JE (2009) CO2 capture technologies for cement industry. Energy Procedia 1:133–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.020

  5. Srinivasula Reddy M, Dinakar P, Hanumantha Rao B (2016) A review of the influence of source material’s oxide composition on the compressive strength of geopolymer concrete. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 234:12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MICROMESO.2016.07.005

  6. Al-Otaibi S (2008) Durability of concrete incorporating GGBS activated by waterglass. Constr Build Mater 22:2059–2067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.07.023

  7. Garcia-Lodeiro I, Fernandez Jimenez A (2015) An overview of the chemistry of alkali-activated cement-based binders. Handb Alkali-Activated Cements Mortars Concretes 19–47. https://doi.org/10.1533/9781782422884.1.19

  8. Gifford P, Gillott J (1996) Alkali-silica reaction (ASR) and alkali-carbonate reaction (ACR) in activated blast furnace slag cement (ABFSC) concrete. Cem Concr Res 26:21–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(95)00182-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fayomi GU, Mini SE, Fayomi OSI, Ayoola AA (2019) Perspectives on environmental CO2 emission and energy factor in cement industry. In: International conference on energy and sustainable environment, p 331. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/331/1/012035

  10. Belaid F (2022) How does concrete and cement industry transformation contribute to mitigating climate change challenges? Res Conserv Recycl Adv 15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcradv.2022.200084

  11. Murillo LM, Gordillo M (2017) A study of a hybrid binder based on alkali activated ceramic tile wastes and Portland cement

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yang C, Pu X, Wu F (1999) Research on long-term alkali—aggregate reaction of alkaline cement system (in Chinese). China Concr Cem Prod 3:3–7

    Google Scholar 

  13. Davidovits (2008) Geopolymer chemistry and applications. Inst Geopolymer Saint-Quentin

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amina Sageer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sageer, A. et al. (2024). Comparative Study Between Alkali-Activated Mortar and Conventional Mortar Towards Sulphuric Acid. In: Sreekeshava, K.S., Kolathayar, S., Vinod Chandra Menon, N. (eds) Recent Advances in Structural Engineering. IACESD 2023. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 455. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-9502-8_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-9502-8_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-9501-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-9502-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics