Skip to main content

Correlation Analysis Between Seismic Response of Primary Auxiliary Building and Ground Motion Intensity Measures

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Advances in Structural Engineering (IACESD 2023)

Abstract

The auxiliary building (AB) plays a crucial importance in the safety operation of nuclear power plants (NPPs). This study evaluates seismic performances of the primary auxiliary building in the Korean Standard (KS) nuclear power plants (NPPs). The numerical model of the AB structure is developed using a series of multi-layer shell elements, in which nonlinear material properties of concrete and reinforcement are considered. A set of 90 ground motions is employed in time-history analyses for evaluating the seismic performance of the structure. Floor accelerations and displacements of the structure are monitored as engineering demand parameters (EDPs). Statistical indicators including the goodness of fit (R2), standard deviation, and practicality are employed to evaluate the correlation between EDPs and 21 considered earthquake intensity measures (IMs). The results show that the strongest correlated IMs are \(S_{a} \left( {T_{1} } \right)\), \(S_{v} \left( {T_{1} } \right)\), \(S_{d} \left( {T_{1} } \right)\), followed by \(ASI\), \(SMA\), \(EPA\), and \(PGA\).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cao V, Ronagh H (2014) Correlation between seismic parameters of far-fault motions and damage indices of low-rise reinforced concrete frames. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 66:102–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Corigliano M, Lai CG, Barla G (2007) Seismic vulnerability of rock tunnels using fragility curves. In: 11th ISRM congress. International society for rock mechanics

    Google Scholar 

  3. Elenas A, Meskouris K (2001) Correlation study between seismic acceleration parameters and damage indices of structures. Eng Struct 23(6):698–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Massumi A, Gholami F (2016) The influence of seismic intensity parameters on structural damage of RC buildings using principal components analysis. Appl Math Model 40(3):2161–2176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kostinakis K, Athanatopoulou A, Morfidis K (2015) Correlation between ground motion intensity measures and seismic damage of 3D R/C buildings. Eng Struct 82:151–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pejovic J, Serdar N, Pejovic R (2017) Optimal intensity measures for probabilistic seismic demand models of RC high-rise buildings. Earthquakes Struct 13(3):221–230

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nguyen DD, Park D, Shamsher S, Nguyen VQ, Lee TH (2019) Seismic vulnerability assessment of rectangular cut-and-cover subway tunnels. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 86:247–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Phan HN, Paolacci F (2016) Efficient intensity measures for probabilistic seismic response analysis of anchored above-ground liquid steel storage tanks. In: Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang Y, Ding Y, Pang Y (2015) Selection of optimal intensity measures in seismic damage analysis of cable-stayed bridges subjected to far-fault ground motions. J Earthquake Tsunami 9(01):1550003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Padgett JE, Nielson BG, DesRoches R (2008) Selection of optimal intensity measures in probabilistic seismic demand models of highway bridge portfolios. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 37(5):711–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jahangiri V, Yazdani M, Marefat MS (2018) Intensity measures for the seismic response assessment of plain concrete arch bridges. Bull Earthq Eng 16(9):4225–4248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zelaschi C, Monteiro R, Pinho R (2019) Critical assessment of intensity measures for seismic response of Italian RC bridge portfolios. J Earthquake Eng 23(6):980–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Avşar Ö, Özdemir G (2011) Response of seismic-isolated bridges in relation to intensity measures of ordinary and pulselike ground motions. J Bridg Eng 18(3):250–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nguyen DD, Thusa B, Han TS, Lee TH (2020) Identifying significant earthquake intensity measures for evaluating seismic damage and fragility of nuclear power plant structures. Nucl Eng Technol 52(1):192–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nguyen DD, Thusa B, Azad MS, Tran VL, Lee TH (2021) Optimal earthquake intensity measures for probabilistic seismic demand models of ARP1400 reactor containment building. Nucl Eng Technol 53(12):4179–4188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nguyen DD, Lee TH, Phan VT (2021) Optimal earthquake intensity measures for probabilistic seismic demand models of base-isolated nuclear power plant structures. Energies 14(16):5163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dobry R, Idriss IM, Ng E (1978) Duration characteristics of horizontal components of strong-motion earthquake records. Bull Seismol Soc Am 68(5):1487–1520

    Google Scholar 

  19. Arias A (1970) A measure of earthquake intensity. Massachusetts Inst. of Tech., Cambridge. Univ. of Chile, Santiago de Chile

    Google Scholar 

  20. Park Y, Ang AH, Wen YK (1985) Seismic damage analysis of reinforced concrete buildings. J Struct Eng 111(4):740–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Benjamin JR (1988) A criterion for determining exceedance of the operating basis earthquake. Report EPRI NP-5930, Electrical Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California

    Google Scholar 

  22. Housner GW (1952) Spectrum intensities of strong-motion earthquakes. In: Symposium on earthquake and blast effects on structures, Los Angeles, California, USA, pp 20–36

    Google Scholar 

  23. Thun JL (1988) Earthquake ground motions for design and analysis of dams. Earthquake Eng Soil Dynam II-Recent Adv Ground-Motion Eval

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nuttli OW (1979) The relation of sustained maximum ground acceleration and velocity to earthquake intensity and magnitude. Report 16, Misc. Paper S-73-1, US Army Waterways Experimental Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shome N, Cornell CA, Bazzurro P, Carballo JE (1998) Earthquakes, records, and nonlinear responses. Earthq Spectra 14(3):469–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sarma SK, Yang KS (1987) An evaluation of strong motion records and a new parameter A95. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 15(1):119–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rathje EM, Norman AA, Bray J (1998) Simplified frequency content estimates of earthquake ground motions. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng 124(2)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Duy-Duan Nguyen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nguyen, TT.T., Phan, VL., Nguyen, DD. (2024). Correlation Analysis Between Seismic Response of Primary Auxiliary Building and Ground Motion Intensity Measures. In: Sreekeshava, K.S., Kolathayar, S., Vinod Chandra Menon, N. (eds) Recent Advances in Structural Engineering. IACESD 2023. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 455. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-9502-8_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-9502-8_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-9501-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-9502-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics