Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Review on Current Materials, Their Failures, and Advancement in Railway Sleepers

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Advances in Building Materials and Technologies (IACESD 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 456))

  • 21 Accesses

Abstract

The materials and technology used in the production of railway sleepers have advanced from conventional wooden sleepers to composite sleepers. The strength, service life, and durability of sleepers are always the major concern when placed on the tracks. Though many measures were being taken, the service life and durability are still the limitations with the sleepers. This paper presents a comprehensive review of types of railway sleepers used, their advantages, limitations, and latest technologies adopted during production. It is learnt that the conventional sleepers used to suffer from problems like fungal decay, rail-seat abrasion, and high degree of wear and tear which increase their operational and maintenance cost. The alternative materials and technologies used in the manufacture of railway sleepers across the world to improve its durability was reviewed critically. The laboratory and field studies reveal that the use of fibers, mineral admixture, pre-stressing technologies, and composite materials show better prospects in the design life and serviceability. Fly-ash-based sleepers have turned out to be a cost-effective and environmentally friendly alternative to conventional sleepers. Composite sleepers with glass fiber polymers used in longitudinal and transverse directions have improved the flexural and shear carrying capacities of the sleepers. Basalt polymers fibers and basalt fibers as pre-stressing material can be viewed as a cost-effective alternative, to improve the durability of concrete sleepers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kaewunruen S, Remennikov A (2008) Impact damage classification of railway prestressed concrete sleepers proceeding of conference on railway engineering, Perth, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ferdous W, Manalo A (2014) Failures of mainline railway sleepers and suggested remedies—review of current practice. Engg Fail Anal 44:17–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Antonio S, Martins AC, Feio AO, Machado JS (2015) Feasibility of creosote treatment for glue-laminated pine-timber railway sleepers. J Mater Civ Eng 27(3):04014134:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  4. Smith RL, Shiau R-J (1998) An industry evaluation of the reuse, recycling and reduction of spent CCA wood products. Forest Prod J 48(2):44–48

    Google Scholar 

  5. Singh J (1999) Dry rot and other wood-destroying fungi: their occurrence, biology, pathology and control. Indoor Built Environ 8:3–20

    Google Scholar 

  6. ARTC (2011) Timber sleeper and turnout specification, ETA-02-01. Engineering (Track & Civil) Standard, Australian Rail Track Corporation

    Google Scholar 

  7. Manalo A, Aravinthan T, Karunasena W, Ticoalu A (2010) A review of alternative materials for replacing existing timber sleepers. Compos Struct 92(3):603–611

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ferdous W, Manalo A, Gerard Van, Aravinthan T, Kaewunruen S, Remennikov A (2015) Composite railway sleepers—recent developments, challenges and future prospects. Compos Struct 134:158–168

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kaewunruen S, Remennikov A (2009) Dynamic flexural influence on a railway concrete sleeper in track system due to single wheel impact. Engg Fail Anal 16(3):705–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Andrade Silva E, Pokropski D, You R, Kaewuruen S (2017) Comparison of structural design methods for railway composites and plastic sleepers and bearers. Australian J Struct Science 18(3):160–177

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kaewunruen S, Remennikov AM (2011) Experiments into impact behavior of railway prestressed concrete sleepers. Eng Fail Anal 18:2305–2315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lampo R (2022) Recycled plastic composite railroad crossties. http://www.cif.org/Nom2002/Nom13_02.pdf [viewed 06.07.2022]

  13. Atis CD (2002) High volume fly ash abrasion resistant concrete. J Mater Civil Eng 14:274–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ma C, Zhang X, Li X (2011) Cause and prevention practice of rail seat abrasion of concrete ties. In: 2nd International conference on civil engineering, China. 16–18 December 2011. pp 561–564

    Google Scholar 

  15. Crawford RH (2009) Greenhouse gas emissions embodied in reinforced concrete and timber railway sleepers. Environ Sci Technol 43. https://doi.org/10.1021/es8023836

  16. Palomo A, Fernández-Jiménez A (2011) Alkaline activation, procedure for transforming fly ash into new materials. Part I: applications. World of Coal Ash (WOCA) Conference, USA

    Google Scholar 

  17. Palomo A, Jiménez AF, Hombrados CL, Lleyda JL (2007) Railway sleepers made of alkali activated fly ash concrete. Revista Ingeniería de Construcción 22:75–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Remennikov AM, Kaewunruen S (2008) A review on loading conditions for railway track structures due to train and track vertical interaction. Struct Control Health Monit 15:207–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sedeghi J, Reza Tolou Kian A, Shater Khabbazi A (2016) Improvement of mechanical properties of railway tracks concrete sleepers using steel fibers. J Mater Civ Eng 28(11)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wallah SE, Hardjito D, Sumajouw DMJ, Rangan BV (2005) Sulfate and acid resistance of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. In: Australian structural engineering conference

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dayananda Sagar Academy of Technology and Management, Bangalore, India

    P. Girish

  2. Amruta Institute of Engineering and Management, Bangalore, India

    Santhos M. Murnal

Authors
  1. P. Girish
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Santhos M. Murnal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Girish .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Karnataka Surathkal, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India

    Sreevalsa Kolathayar

  2. Department of Civil Engineering, Jyothy Institute of Technology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

    K. S. Sreekeshava

  3. Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kollam, Kerala, India

    N. Vinod Chandra Menon

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Girish, P., Murnal, S.M. (2024). A Review on Current Materials, Their Failures, and Advancement in Railway Sleepers. In: Kolathayar, S., Sreekeshava, K.S., Vinod Chandra Menon, N. (eds) Recent Advances in Building Materials and Technologies. IACESD 2023. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 456. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-9458-8_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-9458-8_42

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-9457-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-9458-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation