Skip to main content

Recycled Sands from Demolition Wastes as a Natural Sand Substitute Material in Pavement Construction

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Sustainable Construction Resources in Geotechnical Engineering (IC-CREST 2023)

Abstract

The accumulation of construction and demolition (C&D) waste in landfills is deemed a worldwide concern which is exacerbated by the impact of rapid urbanization and increased construction activities. The massive amount of waste disposal and increased demand for non-renewable virgin quarry materials such as natural sand triggers the urgent need to adopt various kinds of recycled materials in geotechnical fields, such as washed recycled sand (RS). Washed RS reviewed in this study is derived from C&D waste at a local washing plant in Melbourne, Victoria. Two types of washed RS were used as the target materials in this research based on their ranges of particle size: coarse recycled sand (CRS) and fine recycled sand (FRS). CRS and FRS have precisely the same source materials, while FRS experiences an extra round of the washing process. Extensive geotechnical laboratory tests were performed on an unbound stage, and the results indicated that both CRS and FRS exhibited similar geotechnical behavior with natural sand when used as pavement subgrade materials. Further, the geoenvironmental test suggested that the application of washed RS would not adversely impact the surrounding environment or human health. In addition, RS stabilized with 4% Portland Cement was found to effectively fulfill the relative requirement regulated by the local road authority through the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) test. This study highlighted that CRS and FRS could successfully substitute the role of natural sand required for pavement construction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Pickin J, Wardle C, O’Farrell K, Nyunt P, Donovan S (2020) National Waste Report 2020. Blue Environment Pty Ltd., Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  2. Maghool F, Arulrajah A, Ghorbani B, Horpibulsuk S (2022) Strength and permanent deformation properties of demolition wastes, glass, and plastics stabilized with foamed bitumen for pavement bases. Construct Build Mater 320:126108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arulrajah A, Horpibulsuk S, Maghoolpilehrood F, Samingthong W, Du Y-J, Shen S-L (2015) Evaluation of interface shear strength properties of geogrid reinforced foamed recycled glass using a large-scale direct shear testing apparatus. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2015:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vieira CS, Pereira PM, de Lurdes Lopes M (2016) Recycled construction and demolition wastes as filling material for geosynthetic reinforced structures. interface properties. J Clean Prod 124:299–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Toghroli A, Shariati M, Sajedi F, Ibrahim Z, Koting S, Mohamad ET, Khorami M (2018) A review on pavement porous concrete using recycled waste materials. Smart Struct. Syst 22(4):433–440

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang J, Gu F, Zhang Y (2019) Use of building-related construction and demolition wastes in highway embankment: laboratory and field evaluations. J Clean Prod 230:1051–1060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yaghoubi E, Yaghoubi M, Guerrieri M, Sudarsanan N (2021) Improving expansive clay subgrades using recycled glass: Resilient modulus characteristics and pavement performance. Construct Build Mater 302:124384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Arulrajah A, Disfani MM, Haghighi H, Mohammadinia A, Horpibulsuk S (2015) Modulus of rupture evaluation of cement stabilized recycled glass/recycled concrete aggregate blends. Construct Build Mater 84:146–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Naeini M, Mohammadinia A, Arulrajah A, Horpibulsuk S, Leong M (2019) Stiffness and strength characteristics of demolition waste, glass and plastics in railway capping layers. Soils Found 59(6):2238–2253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang HJ, Xiao Tang Y, Duan Z, Poon C-S (2022) Long-term shrinkage and mechanical properties of fully recycled aggregate concrete: Testing and modelling. Cement Concr Compos 130:104527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Adomako S, Engelsen CJ, Thorstensen RT, Barbieri DM (2022) Repeated load triaxial testing of recycled excavation materials blended with recycled phyllite materials. Materials 15(2):621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. ASTM (2017) Standard test methods for particle-size distribution (gradation) of soils using sieve analysis. West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  13. ASTM (2017) Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system. West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zaimoglu AS (2011) Engineering properties of sand stabilised with borogypsum. Proc Inst Civil Eng Geotech Eng 164(4):277–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wijepala U, Jayakody S, Zimar A, Jayasinghe J, Jayasena W (2019) Characterization of the properties of manufactured sand and natural river sand. In: 7th International Symposium on Advances in Civil and Environmental Engineering Practices for Sustainable Development (ACEPS-2019)

    Google Scholar 

  16. ASTM (2016) Standard test methods for maximum index density and unit weight of soils using a vibratory table. West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shu S, Yan B, Ge B, Li S, Meng H (2022) Factors affecting soybean crude urease extraction and biocementation via enzyme-induced carbonate precipitation (EICP) for soil improvement. Energies 15(15):5566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Standards Australia (2000) Method for sampling and testing aggregates, in Method 5: Particle density and water absorption of fine aggregate

    Google Scholar 

  19. Standards Australia (2014) Methods for testing soils for engineering purposes, in Method 6.1.1: Soil strength and consolidation tests—Determination of the California Bearing Ratio of a soil - Standard laboratory method for a remoulded specimen

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pavement Engineering Unit (2015) Guide to bikeway pavement design, construction and maintenance. T.a.I. Department of Planning

    Google Scholar 

  21. VicRoads (2015) Earthworks. In: Section 204—Earthworks. Department of Transport

    Google Scholar 

  22. Puppala AJ, Mohammad LN, Allen A (1996) Engineering behavior of lime-treated Louisiana subgrade soil. Transp Res Rec 1546(1):24–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. AASHTO (2012) Standard method of test for determining the resilient modulus of soils and aggregate materials

    Google Scholar 

  24. Puppala AJ, Hoyos LR, Potturi AK (2011) Resilient moduli response of moderately cement-treated reclaimed asphalt pavement aggregates. J Mater Civil Eng 23(7):990–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Peng F-L, Li J-Z (2004) Modeling of state parameter and hardening function for granular materials. J Cent South Univ Technol 11(2):176–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Maghool F, Arulrajah A, Horpibulsuk S, Du Y-J (2017) Laboratory evaluation of ladle furnace slag in unbound pavement-base/subbase applications. J Mater Civ Eng 29(2):04016197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lin Y, Maghool F, Arulrajah A, Horpibulsuk S (2021) Engineering characteristics and environmental risks of utilizing recycled aluminum salt slag and recycled concrete as a sustainable geomaterial. Sustainability 13(19):10633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Attia M, Abdelrahman M (2011) Effect of state of stress on the resilient modulus of base layer containing reclaimed asphalt pavement. Road Mater Pavem Des 12(1):79–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. US EPA (2009) National primary drinking water regulations

    Google Scholar 

  30. EPA Victoria (2009) Industrial waste resource guidelines, in Solid industrial waste hazard categorisation and management

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported under Australian Research Council’s Linkage Projects funding scheme (Project Number LP200100052). The authors appreciate the kind support of Repurpose It Pty Ltd., Victoria, Australia as the project partner. The authors also acknowledge Repurpose It Pty Ltd., Victoria, Australia for provisions of the recycled sand source material.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yunxin Xue .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Xue, Y., Arulrajah, A., Horpibulsuk, S., Jian, C., Narsilio, G. (2024). Recycled Sands from Demolition Wastes as a Natural Sand Substitute Material in Pavement Construction. In: Hazarika, H., Haigh, S.K., Chaudhary, B., Murai, M., Manandhar, S. (eds) Sustainable Construction Resources in Geotechnical Engineering. IC-CREST 2023. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 448. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-9227-0_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-9227-0_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-9226-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-9227-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics