Abstract
Retaining walls are designed considering lateral pressure acting on the walls due to retained backfill, traffic and seismic loads, etc., and the reduction in the lateral pressure exerted on the wall would lead to a reduction in construction costs. The provision of a compressible inclusion between the wall and backfill changes the stress state in the retained wall, resulting in a significant reduction in lateral pressure on the wall. Expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam is a suitable inclusion material due to its lightweight, predictable stress–strain response, availability, and ease of installation. Though several studies were reported on the use of EPS geofoam to reduce earth pressures on retaining walls, most of the studies were based on small-scale model tests, and understanding the effect of EPS geofoam through full-scale instrumented studies is very essential. In the present study, fully instrumented field tests are conducted to check the suitability of EPS as an inclusion material to reduce the earth pressures on a rigid reinforced concrete cantilever retaining wall. A wall of 6 m in height and 8 m in length is constructed, divided into two sections of 4 m each. Each section is instrumented with earth pressure cells (EPC) for pressure measurement. A 250 mm thick EPS15 inclusion is used in one section, and in another section, no inclusion is placed. The response of EPC in both sections is continuously monitored during the backfilling process. The results clearly show significant differences in the response of EPC on sections with and without geofoam.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aabøe R, Bartlett SF, Duškov M, Frydenlund DNTE, Mandal JN, Özer AT, Tsukamoto H, Vaslestad J (2019) Geofoam blocks in civil engineering applications. In: 5th international conference on geofoam blocks in construction applications, 36. Springer International Publishing, Kyrenia, Northern Cyprus
Bathurst RJ, Zarnani S, Gaskin A (2007) Shaking table testing of geofoam seismic buffers. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 27(4):324–332
Chauhan VB, Dasaka SM (2018) Performance of a rigid retaining wall with relief shelves. J Perf Constr Facilities 32(3):1–9
Dasaka SM, Dave TN, Gade VK, Chauhan VB (2014) Seismic earth pressure reduction on gravity retaining walls using EPS geofoam. In: Physical modelling in geotechnics—proceedings of the 8th international conference on physical modelling in geotechnics 2014, ICPMG 2 Dec 2014, 1025–1030
Dasaka SM, Gade VK (2018) Effect of long-term performance of EPS geofoam on lateral earth pressures on retaining walls. In: Geotechnics for natural and engineered sustainable technologies, developments in geotechnical engineering, 271–289
Dunnicliff J (1982) Geotechnical instrumentation for monitoring field performance. Nat Cooper Highway Res Progr 89:52
Ertugrul OL, Trandafir AC (2011) Reduction of lateral earth forces acting on rigid nonyielding retaining walls by EPS geofoam inclusions. J Mater Civ Eng 23(12):1711–1718
Ertugrul OL, Trandafir AC (2013) Lateral earth pressures on flexible cantilever retaining walls with deformable geofoam inclusions. J Eng Geol 158:23–33
Hannon JB, Jackura KA (1985) Measurement of earth pressure. Transp Res Rec 1004:6–13
Horvath JS (1997) The compressible inclusion function of EPS geofoam. Geotext Geomembr 15(1–3):77–120
Horvath JS (2008) Seismic lateral earth pressure reduction on earth-retaining structures using geofoams. Geotech Special Publ 181:1–10
IRC: 78 (2014) Standard specifications and code of practice for road bridges. Section VII-foundations and substructure. In: Indian road congress, New Delhi
IS: 2720-Part 14 (1983) Methods of test for soils: determination of density index (relative density) of cohesionless soils. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi
Karpurapu R, Bathurst RJ (1992) Numerical investigation of controlled yielding of soil-retaining wall structures. Geotext Geomembr 11(2):115–131
Lazebnik GE, Tsinker GP (1998) Monitoring of soil-structure interaction: instruments for measuring soil pressures. Springer·Science + Business Media, B.V.
Lin L-K, Chen L-H, Chen RHL (2010) Evaluation of geofoam as a geotechnical construction material. J Mater Civ Eng 22(2):160–170
Shrestha S, Ravichandran N (2018) Performance of retaining wall backfilled with tire aggregate under static and dynamic loading conditions: conventional designs and finite element simulations. Int J Geotech Eng 6362:1–13
Zarnani S, Bathurst RJ (2008) Numerical modeling of EPS seismic buffer shaking table tests. Geotext Geomembr 26(5):371–383
Zarnani S, Bathurst RJ (2009) Numerical parametric study of expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam seismic buffers. Can Geotech J 46(3):318–338
Zarnani S, Bathurst RJ (2007) Experimental investigation of EPS geofoam seismic buffers using shaking table tests. Geosynth Int 14(3):165–177
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to MHRD (UAY scheme), SAVI Infrastructure and Properties Pvt. Ltd., and IIT Bombay for their financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bishnoi, D., Patil, V., Dasaka, S.M. (2024). EPS as an Inclusion Material: An Instrumented Field Study on Retaining Wall. In: Hazarika, H., Haigh, S.K., Chaudhary, B., Murai, M., Manandhar, S. (eds) Sustainable Construction Resources in Geotechnical Engineering. IC-CREST 2023. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 448. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-9227-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-9227-0_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-9226-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-9227-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)