Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Relationship Between Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Firm’s Performance Pre and Post-Malaysian Corporate Code Governance 2017: The Moderating Effect of Women Directors on Board

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Approaches to CSR, Sustainability and Accountability, Volume V

  • 59 Accesses

Abstract

The composition of the board especially the inclusion of women directors on the board has attracted scholarly interest and public debate. The empirical evidence has failed to build a holistic case to support the women director’s influence on the world. In line with the revision of the Malaysian Code of Corporate Governance (MCCG) 2017, this study is carried out to ascertain the moderating effect of women directors’ participation on the relationship between corporate governance mechanisms and firm performance before and after the revision. The components of corporate governance mechanisms are; board independence, independence of audit committee, director’s remuneration, risk management committee, and board meeting frequency. This study used Tobin’s Q as the proxy of firm performance. Companies listed on the main board of Bursa Malaysia were selected using a stratified random sampling method and relevant data were extracted from the annual report of selected companies for a period of the year 2015 and 2016 (before) and period of the year 2018 and 2019 (after) the revised code. Hierarchical regression analysis was used in over 200 selected public listed companies. The perspective of agency theory and resource-based view theory (RBVT) was applied to explain the relationship between corporate governance mechanisms and firm financial performance. The findings suggest that women directors moderate the relationship between the independence of the audit committee and firm performance before the MCCG 2017 revision. Meanwhile, the independence of the audit committee and director’s remuneration was positively and significantly related to performance before the MCCG 2017 revision. After the MCCG 2017 revision, only the board meeting frequency was positively and significantly related to firm performance. It is important for the government and policymakers to review and revisit the MCCG 2017 and to reinforce the mandatory requirements of the code to be fully adopted by the public listed companies in Malaysia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdullah M, Shukor ZA, Rahmat MM (2017) The influences of risk management committee and audit committee towards voluntary risk management disclosure. Jurnal Pengurusan (UKM J Manag) 50:83–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdullah SN, Ku Ismail KNI, Nachum L (2016) Does having women on boards create value? The impact of societal perceptions and corporate governance in emerging markets. Strateg Manag J 37(3):466–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdullah SN (2016) Corporate governance mechanisms and the performance of Malaysian listed firms. Corp Ownersh Control 14(1–2):384–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdullah SN, Ku Ismail KNI (2013) Gender, ethnic, and Age diversity of the boards of large Malaysian firms and performance. Manag J 38:27–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdullah WN, Said R (2019) Audit and risk committee in financial crime prevention. J Financial Crime 26(1):223–234. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-11-2017-0116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aboody D, Lev B (2000) Information asymmetry, R&D, and insider gains. J Financ 55(6):2747–2766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams R, Funk P (2007) Beyond the glass ceiling: does gender matter? Manage Sci 58(2):219–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams RB, Ferreira D (2009) Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. J Financ Econ 94(2):291–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aggarwal R, Ghosh A (2015) Director’s remuneration and correlation on firm’s performance: a study from the Indian corporate. Int J Law Manag 57(5):373–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad M, Kamaruzaman RNSR, Hamdan H, Annuar HA (2020) Women directors and firm performance: Malaysian evidence post policy announcement. J Econ Administr Sci 36(2):97–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad RAR, Abdullah N, Jamel NESM, Omar N (2015) Board characteristics and risk management and internal control disclosure level: evidence from Malaysia. Procedia Econ Finance 31:601–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al Farooque O, Buachoom W, Sun L (2019) Board, audit committee, ownership, and financial performance–emerging trends from Thailand. Pac Account Rev 32(1):54–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Mamun A, Yasser QR, Rahman MA, Wickramasinghe A, Nathan TM (2014) Relationship between audit committee characteristics, external auditors, and economic value added (EVA) of public listed firms in Malaysia. Corp Ownersh Control 12(1):899–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Matari EM, Fadzil FH, Al-Swidi AK (2014) The moderating effect of board diversity on the relationship between board of directors characteristics and firm performance in Oman: empirical study. Middle East J Scient Res 21(5):782–791

    Google Scholar 

  • Alqatamin RM (2018) Audit committee effectiveness and company performance: evidence from Jordan. Account Finance Res 7(2):48–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amar AB (2014) The effect of independence audit committee on earnings management: the case in French. Int J Acad Res Account Finance Manag Sci 4(1):96–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Amit R, Schoemaker PJ (1993) Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strateg Manag J 14(1):33–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amran NA, Ku Ismail KNI, Aripin N, Hassan N, Abdul Manaf KB, Abdullah SN (2014) Women directors involvement in Malaysia. Austr J Basic Appl Sci 8(5):226–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Arena M, Azzone G, Bengo I (2015) Performance measurement for social enterprises. VOLUNTAS: Int J Voluntary Nonprofit Organ 26(2):649–672

    Google Scholar 

  • Aripin N, Hassan NL, Amran NA, Ismail KNIK, Abdul-Manaf KB (2016) Do Malaysian women directors create corporate value? Adv Sci Lett 22(5–6):1423–1426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arosa B, Iturralde T, Maseda A (2010) Outsiders on the board of directors and firm performance: evidence from Spanish non-listed family firms. J Fam Bus Strat 1(4):236–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arun TG, Almahrog YE, Aribi ZA (2015) Female directors and earnings management: evidence from UK companies. Int Rev Financ Anal 39:137–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awang N, Hussin NS, Razali FA, Talib A (2021) A descriptive study on standalone risk management committee adoption among the top 50 Malaysian firms. J Soc Sci Humanit 5(2):84–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Azmi IAG, Barrett MA (2013) Women on boards and company financial performance: a study of Malaysian SMEs. In: Proceedings of 3rd global accounting, finance and economics conference, 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Baharudin DM, Marimuthu M (2019) MCCG 2012 versus MCCG 2017: board gender diversity and women CEO issues within the male-dominated oil and gas industry. Bus Manag Strat 10(2):122–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakar ABSA, Ghazali NABM, Ahmad MB (2019) Sustainability reporting and board diversity in Malaysia. Int J Acad Res Bus Soc Sci 9(2):1044–1067

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag 17(1):99–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney JB (1996) The resource-based theory of the firm. Organ Sci 7(5):469–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney JB (2001) Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: a ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view. J Manag 27(6):643–650

    Google Scholar 

  • Brannon L (1999) Gender: psychological perspective. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Buachoom W (2018) How do board structures of Thai firms influence on different quantile levels of firm performance? Adv Pacific Basin Bus Econ Finance 6:157–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byron K, Post C (2016) Women on boards of directors and corporate social performance: a meta-analysis. Corporate Govern Int Rev 24(4):428–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catalyst (2011) Women on boards. Available at: https://www.som.cranfield.ac.uk/som/dinamic-content/media/Research/Research%20Centres/Centre%20for%20Women%20Leaders/6%20month%20monitoring%20report-final%20pdf.pdf

  • Chin YS, Ganesan Y, Pitchay AA, Haron H, Hendayani R (2019) Corporate governance and firm value: the moderating effect of board gender diversity. J Entrepreneurship Bus Econ 7(2s):43–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily CM, Dalton DR (2003) Women in the boardroom: a business imperative. J Bus Strategy 24(5)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton DR, Daily CM, Ellstrand AE, Johnson JL (1998) Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strateg Manag J 19(3):269–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damak ST (2018) Gender diverse board and earnings management: evidence from French listed companies. Sustain Account Manag Policy J 9(3):289–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Đặng R, Houanti LH, Reddy K, Simioni M (2020) Does board gender diversity influence firm profitability? A control function approach. Econ Model 90(2020):168–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Depken CA, Nguyen GX, Sarkar SK (2006) Agency costs, executive compensation, bonding, and monitoring: a stochastic frontier approach. In Annual Meeting of American Economic Association (AEA), Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Drago WA (1995) Internal organisational domain and competitive strategy. Manag Res News 18(8):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly AH, Johannesen-Schmidt MC (2001) The leadership style of women and men. J Soc Issues 57(4):781–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama EF (1980) Agency problems and the theory of the firm. J Polit Econ 88(2):288–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama EF, Jensen MC (1983) Separation of ownership and control. J Law Econ 26(2):301–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein N, Choo J (2005) Law and corporate governance. Ann Revision Law Soc Sci 1:61–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galia F, Zenou E (2013) Does board diversity influence innovation? The impact of gender and age diversity on innovation types. In: XXII Conference Internationale de management strategic, 10–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Germain L, Galy N, Lee W (2014) Corporate governance reform in Malaysia: board size, independence and monitoring. J Econ Bus 75:126–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gujarati D (1995) Basic economics. McGraw-Hill Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Gul FA, Srinidhi B, Ng AC (2011) Does board gender diversity improve the informativeness of stock prices? J Account Econ 51(3):314–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunawan CC, Murhadi WR, Utami M (2019) A study on the effects of good corporate governance–gender diversity on the company performance. In: 16th International symposium on management (INSYMA 2019). Atlantis Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair Jr JF, Hult GTM, Ringle C, Sarstedt M (2017) A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Haji AA, Mubaraq S (2015) The implications of the revised code of corporate governance on firm performance. J Account Emerg Econ 5(3):350–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamid FZA, Shafie R, Othman Z, Hussin WNW, Fadzil FH (2013) Cooking the books: the case of Malaysian listed companies. Int J Bus Soc Sci 4(13)

    Google Scholar 

  • Haron H, Akhtaruddin M (2013) Determinants of directors’ remuneration in malaysian public listed companies. Indian J Corporate Govern 6(2):17–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim HB, Ouma C, Koshal JN (2019) Effect of gender diversity on the financial performance of insurance firms in Kenya. Int J Res Bus Soc Sci 8(5):274–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaafar MY, Nawawi A, Salin ASAP (2019) Factors influencing directors’ remuneration disclosure in Malaysia PLCs. Pertanika J Soc Sci Humanit 27(2):1049–1071

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakpar S, Tinggi M, Johari A, Myint KT (2019) Analysis of corporate governance and firm performance: evidence from malaysian listed companies. Int J Bus Soc Sci 10(1):118–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen MC (1993) The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. J Finance 48(3):831–880

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen MC, Meckling WH (1976) Agency costs and the theory of the firm. J Financ Econ 3(4):305–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiraporn P, Miller GA, Yoon SS, Kim YS (2008) Is earnings management opportunistic or beneficial? An agency theory perspective. Int Rev Financ Anal 17(3):622–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joecks J, Pull K, Scharfenkamp K (2017) Women directors’ roles on corporate boards: insights from a qualitative study. Available at SSRN 2962947

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakanda MM, Salim B, Chandren S (2018) Corporate governance characteristics and financial performance of deposit money banks in Nigeria. J Int Bus Manag 1(3):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallamu BS (2016) Impact of the revised Malaysian code on corporate governance on audit committee attributes and firm performance. Global J Manag Bus Res 16(1), ISSN: 2249-4588

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan H, Hassan R, Marimuthu M (2017) Diversity on corporate boards and firm performance: an empirical evidence from Malaysia. Amer J Soc Sci Humanities 2(1):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim D, Starks LT (2016) Gender diversity on corporate boards: do women contribute unique skills? Amer Econ Rev 106(5):267–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konrad AM, Kramer V, Erkut S (2008) The impact of three or more women on corporate boards. Organ Dyn 37(2):145–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakshan AMI, Wijekoon WMHN (2012) Corporate governance and corporate failure. Procedia Econ Finance 2:191–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Chen P (2018) Board gender diversity and firm performance: the moderating role of firm size. Bus Ethics Europ Rev 27(4):294–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim AL, Hashim F, Embong Z (2019a) Board characteristics, investors’ confidence and firm value: Malaysian evidence. Asian J Account Govern 12:169–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim KP, Lye CT, Yuen YY, Teoh WMY (2019b) Women directors and performance: evidence from Malaysia. Equality Diversity Inclusion Int J 38(8):841–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low DC, Roberts H, Whiting RH (2015) Board gender diversity and firm performance: empirical evidence from Hong Kong, South Korea, Malaysia, and Singapore. Pac Basin Financ J 35:381–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luckerath-Rovers M (2013) Women on boards and firm performance. J Manage Governance 17(2):491–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madhani PM (2017) Diverse roles of corporate board: review of various corporate governance theories. IUP J Corporate Govern 16(2):7–28. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2981605

  • Malaysian Code of Corporate Governance (2000) report on corporate governance. Kuala Lumpur: Securities Commission

    Google Scholar 

  • Malaysian Code of Corporate Governance (2007) Report on corporate governance. Kuala Lumpur: Securities Commission

    Google Scholar 

  • Malaysian Code of Corporate Governance (2012) Report on corporate governance. Kuala Lumpur: Securities Commission

    Google Scholar 

  • Malaysian Code of Corporate Governance (2017) Report on corporate governance. Kuala Lumpur: Securities Commission

    Google Scholar 

  • Malaysian Code of Corporate Governance (2021) Report on corporate governance. Kuala Lumpur: Securities Commission

    Google Scholar 

  • Marimuthu M, Kolandaisamy I (2009) Ethnic and gender diversity in boards of directors and their relevance to the financial performance of Malaysian companies. J Sustain Develop 2(3):139–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McColgan P (2001) Agency theory and corporate governance: a review of the literature from a UK perspective. Department of Accounting and Finance working paper, 6, 0203

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyienda B, Oirere CO, Miyogo J (2013) The relationship between director remuneration and performance of firms listed in the Nairobi securities exchange. Int J Soc Sci 15(1):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohamad S, Abdurrahman AP, Keong OC, Garrett C (2020) Corporate governance and firm performance: evidence from listed Malaysian firms. Int J Psychosoc Rehabil 24(02):3668–3678

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammad SJ, Abdullatif M, Zakzouk F (2018) The effect of gender diversity on the financial performance of Jordanian banks. Acad Account Finan Studies J 22(2):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Morck R, Steier L (2005) The global history of corporate governance: An introduction. In A history of corporate governance around the world: family business groups to professional managers, pp 1–64. University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Mustafa AS, Che-Ahmad A, Chandren S (2018) Board diversity, audit committee characteristics, and audit quality: The moderating role of a control-ownership wedge. Bus Econ Horizons (BEH) 14:587–614. (1232–2019–858)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nason RS, Wiklund J (2018) An assessment of resource-based theorizing on firm growth and suggestions for the future. J Manag 44(1):32–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Newbert SL (2007) Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm: an assessment and suggestions for future research. Strateg Manag J 28(2):121–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nzulwa JD, Wagana DM (2016) Corporate governance, board gender diversity and corporate performance: a critical review of literature. Europ Scientific J 12(7)

    Google Scholar 

  • Oroud Y (2019) The effect of audit committee characteristics on the profitability: panel data evidence. Int J Econ Financ 11(4):104–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pucheta-Martinez MC, Gallego-Alvarez I (2019) Do board characteristics drive firm performance? An international perspective. Rev Manag Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-019-00330-x

  • Puni A, Anlesinya A (2020) Corporate governance mechanisms and firm performance in a developing country. Int J Law Manag 62(2):147–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qadorah AAM, Fadzil FHB (2018) The effect of board independence and board meeting on firm performance: evidence from Jordan. J Field Actions 6:105–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Raithatha M, Komera S (2016) Executive compensation and firm performance: evidence from Indian firms. IIMB Manag Rev 28(3):160–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramdani D, Witteloostuijn AV (2010) The impact of board independence and CEO duality on firm performance: a quantile regression analysis for Indonesia, Malaysia, South Korea, and Thailand. Br J Manag 21(3):607–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranasinghe G (2019) Board gender diversity and firm performance: a review of recent literature and future research perspectives. Int J Educ Res 7(12):59–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Raver M, Schneider L (2005) Discrimination in organizations: an organizational-level systems perspective. Discrimination at work: the psychological and organizational bases, 89–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray G, Barney JB, Muhanna WA (2004) Capabilities, business processes, and competitive advantage: choosing the dependent variable in empirical tests of the resource-based view. Strateg Manag J 25(1):23–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razali MWM, Yee NS, Hwang JYT, Tak AHB, Kadri N (2018) Directors’ remuneration and firm’s performance: a study on Malaysian listed firms under the consumer product industry. Int Bus Res 11(5):102–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rimin F, Bujang I, Chu AWS, Said J (2021) The effect of a separate risk management committee (RMC) towards firms’ performances on consumer goods sector in Malaysia. Bus Process Manag J 27(4):1200–1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosener JB (1990) Ways women lead. Harv Bus Rev, 119–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse MJ, Daellenbach US (2002) More thinking on research methods for the resource-based perspective. Strateg Manag J 23(10):963–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salin ASAP, Ab Manan SK, Kamaluddin N, Nawawi A (2017) The role of Islamic ethics to prevent corporate fraud. Int J Bus Soc 18(S1):113–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Salisu U, Ishak Z, Sawandi N (2019) Corporate board and the value of diversified public listed companies in Malaysia. J Bus Retail Manag Res 13(3):36–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shukeri SN, Shin OW, Shaari MS (2012) Does board of director’s characteristics affect firm performance? Evidence from Malaysian public listed companies. Int Bus Res 5(9):120–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddiqui SS (2015) The association between corporate governance and firm performance–a meta-analysis. Int J Account Inf Manag 23(3):218–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinidhi B, Gul FA, Tsui J (2011) Female directors and earnings quality. Contemp Account Res 28(5):1610–1644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subramaniam N, McManus L, Zhang J (2009) Corporate governance, firm characteristics and risk management committee formation in Australian companies. Manag Audit J 24(4):316–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2001) Using multivariate statistics, 4th edn. Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenku Sulaiman TIN, Ahmad NS (2017) Factors that influence corporate governance failures in Malaysia. In: FGIC 1st conference in governance & integrity, pp 79–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Vafeas N (1999) Board meeting frequency and firm performance. J Financ Econ 53(1):113–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velte P (2017) The link between audit committees, corporate governance quality and firm performance: a literature review. Corp Ownersh Control 14(4):15–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisbach MS (1988) Outside directors and CEO turnover. J Financ Econ 20:431–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strateg Manag J 5(2):171–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams DR, Duncan WJ, Ginter PM, Shewchuk RM (2006) Do governance, equity characteristics, and venture capital involvement affect long-term wealth creation in US health care and biotechnology IPOs? J Health Care Finance 33(1):54–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe J, Sauaia AC (2003) The tobin q as a company performance indicator. Develop Bus Simul Experiential Learning 30:155–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav S, Chakraborty A (2020) Impact of Female director on firm performance in emerging economy. Int J Sci Technol Res 9(1):364–369

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sabah Electricity Sdn. Bhd., Sabah, Malaysia

    Shahrina Liza Salisi

  2. Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Sarawak, Sarawak, Malaysia

    Corina Joseph

  3. Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Kedah, Kedah, Malaysia

    Roshima Said

Authors
  1. Shahrina Liza Salisi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Corina Joseph
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Roshima Said
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Corina Joseph .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Finance and Management, Centre for Forensic Accounting Research and Enterprise, SOAS University of London, London, UK

    Kıymet Tunca Çalıyurt

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Salisi, S.L., Joseph, C., Said, R. (2024). The Relationship Between Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Firm’s Performance Pre and Post-Malaysian Corporate Code Governance 2017: The Moderating Effect of Women Directors on Board. In: Çalıyurt, K.T. (eds) New Approaches to CSR, Sustainability and Accountability, Volume V. Accounting, Finance, Sustainability, Governance & Fraud: Theory and Application. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-9145-7_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation