Skip to main content

Innovation and Protection: Why We Should Prioritize Income Redistribution

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Challenges and Solutions to China’s Modernization Process

Part of the book series: China Insights ((CHINAIN))

  • 9 Accesses

Abstract

Over the course of its development, a country is always faced with various obstacles, which can block its way if not properly handled. It will also run into growing pains induced by progress in its march forward. The higher the stage of development, the more growing pains appear in greater complexity and difficulty. As we all know, there is less oxygen at higher altitudes, therefore, we cannot expect the shortage of oxygen to go away as we climb higher. Similarly, while most growing pains are related to specific stages of development, they do not disappear naturally over time. It is especially worth noting that growing pains, whenever and wherever they are, bring about adverse consequences, possibly hindering a society’s progress and preventing it from achieving its goals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    O’Leary (2019).

  2. 2.

    Mill (1991).

  3. 3.

    Okun (2015).

  4. 4.

    Smith (1996, p. 11).

  5. 5.

    Smith (1996, p. 104).

  6. 6.

    Rothschild (2019).

  7. 7.

    Friedman (1962).

  8. 8.

    Cai (2020).

  9. 9.

    Piketty (2020).

  10. 10.

    Subramanian (2020).

  11. 11.

    Lin (1992).

  12. 12.

    Schumpeter (1990, 1999).

  13. 13.

    In addition to Schumpeter’s works, I have also referred to Business Cycles: History, Theory and Investment Reality by Lars Tvede, CITIC Press Group, 2008, and Joseph A. Schumpeter: His Life and Work by Richard Swedberg, Jiangsu People’s Publishing House, 2005.

  14. 14.

    Foster et al. (2001, 2008).

  15. 15.

    Zingales (2014).

  16. 16.

    Philippon (2019).

  17. 17.

    Wolf (2019a).

  18. 18.

    Friedman and Friedman (1990).

  19. 19.

    Krugman (2003).

  20. 20.

    Heyman et al. (2015).

  21. 21.

    Petersen (2019).

  22. 22.

    Wolf (2019b).

  23. 23.

    Cai (2013).

  24. 24.

    Vincent (2019).

  25. 25.

    Covarrubias et al. (2019).

  26. 26.

    Piketty (2014).

  27. 27.

    https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/high-monopoly-profits-persist-in-markets-by-joseph-e-stiglitz-2016-05.

  28. 28.

    Berger and Frey (2016), Sawa (2018).

  29. 29.

    Based on data from https://data.oecd.org/.

  30. 30.

    Cai and Lu (2013).

References

  • Berger, T., & Frey, C. B. (2016). Structural transformation in the OECD: Digitalization, deindustrialization and the future of work. OECD social, employment and migration working papers, No. 193. OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, F. (2013). The Hukou reform and unification of rural urban social welfare. In D. Kennedy & J. Stiglitz (Eds.), Law and economics with Chinese characteristics: Institutions for promoting development in the twenty-first century (pp. 441, 454). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, F. (2020). Economics of pandemic: Weathering with the storm and restoring the growth (Preface). China Social Sciences Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, F., & Lu, Y. (2013). The end of China’s demographic dividend: The perspective of potential GDP growth. In R. Garnaut, F. Cai, & L. Song (Eds.), China: A new model for growth and development (pp. 55–74). ANU E Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covarrubias, M., Gutiérrez, G., & Philippon, T. (2019). From good to bad concentration? U.S. industries over the past 30 years. NBER working paper, 25983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, L., Haltiwanger, J., & Krizan, C. J. (2001). Aggregate productivity growth: Lessons from microeconomic evidence. In New developments in productivity analysis. NBER/University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, L., Haltiwanger, J., & Syverson, C. (2008). Reallocation, firm turnover, and efficiency: Selection productivity or profitability? American Economic Review, 98, 394–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom (pp. 161–162). The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M., & Friedman, R. (1990). Free to choose: A personal statement. A Harvest Book, Hardcourt, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyman, F., Norbäck, P.-J., & Persson, L. (2015). The turnaround of Swedish industry: Reforms, firm diversity and job and productivity dynamics. IFN working paper, No. 1079. Research Institute of Industrial Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (2003). Who knew? The Swedish model is working. In P. Krugman (Ed.), The great unraveling: Losing our way in the new century. W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J. Y. (1992). Rural reforms and agricultural growth in China. The American Economic Review, 82(1), 34–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1991). Principles of political economy: With some of their applications to social philosophy (Chaps. 11–13). The Commercial Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okun, A. M. (2015). Equality and efficiency: The big tradeoff. Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, L. (2019). The anti-Krugman libertarians at sea. Bloomberg Businessweek, September 30, 2019, pp. 48–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, K. (2019). Growth for welfare or welfare for growth? The changing relationship between economic development and social security in the Nordic countries. In G. Zheng & W. Scholz (Eds.), Global social security and economic development: Retrospect and prospect (pp. 230–238). China Labor and Social Security Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philippon, T. (2019). The great reversal: How America gave upon free markets. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T. (2020). Capital and ideology. Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, E. (2019). Economic sentiments: Adam Smith, Condorcet, and the enlightenment (J. Zhao & M. Bie, Trans.) (pp. 112–113). Social Sciences Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawa, T. (2018). What jobs will be lost to AI and robotics? The Japan Times, October 13, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1990). The theory of economic development. The Commercial Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1999). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. The Commercial Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1996). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations (Vol. A) (D. Guo & Y. Wang, Trans.). The Commercial Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. Monopoly’s new era. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/high-monopoly-profits-persist-in-markets-by-joseph-e-stiglitz-2016-05

  • Subramanian, A. (2020). After capital: A radical agenda to tame inequality. Foreign Affairs, 99(4), 165–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, M. (2019). Lossmaking tech companies are floating like its 1999, making some investors wary. FT Wealth, (56), 44–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M. (2019a). Saving capitalism from the rentiers. Financial Times, September 18, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M. (2019b). Hypocrisy and confusion distort the debate on social mobility. Financial Times, May 3, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zingales, L. (2014). A capitalism for the people: Recapturing the lost genius of American prosperity. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fang Cai .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 China Social Sciences Press

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cai, F. (2024). Innovation and Protection: Why We Should Prioritize Income Redistribution. In: Challenges and Solutions to China’s Modernization Process. China Insights. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-9141-9_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics