Abstract
Arbitration, as an ancient dispute resolution system, originated from ad hoc arbitration required for dispute resolution between businessmen. It appeared as early as ancient Greece and medieval Europe and came into being for the reconciliation and resolution of conflicts of interest between private individuals.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
(2016) Hu 01 Xie Wai Recognition No. 12.
- 2.
(2011) Min Si Ta Zi No. 22 Reply Letter of the Supreme People's Court of the People's Republic of China.
- 3.
See N. Kaplan et al., Hongkong and China Arbitration Cases and Materials, Hongkong: Butterworths Asia (1994), pp. 67–171.
- 4.
(2011) Min Si Ta Zi No. 8 Reply Letter of the Supreme Court of People's Republic of China.
- 5.
(2012) Min Si Ta Zi No. 39 Reply Letter of the Supreme People's Court of the People's Republic of China.
- 6.
(2012) Min Si Ta Zi No. 4 Reply Letter of the Supreme People's Court of the People's Republic of China.
- 7.
(2011) Min Si Ta Zi No. 48 Reply Letter of the Supreme Court of People's Republic of China.
- 8.
(2011) Min Si Ta Zi No. 37 Reply Letter of the Supreme Court of People’s Republic of China.
- 9.
(2016) Min Ta No. 78 Reply Letter of the Supreme People's Court of the People's Republic of China.
- 10.
Reply to the Jiangsu High Court's Request for Instructions on Jiangxi LDK Solar High-Tech Co., Ltd. ‘s Application for Enforcement (2013) China CIETAC Jing (Shanghai) Cai Zi No. 006, (2014) Min Si Ta Zi No. 58 Civil Ruling of the Supreme Court of People’s Republic of China.
- 11.
Doctrine of Contra Proferentem, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contra_proferentem (last visited April 6, 2018).
- 12.
Cui Jianyuan, Contract Law, revised 2nd Ed., Beijing: Law Press, (2000), p. 73.
- 13.
(2011) Min Si Ta Zi No. 39 Civil Ruling of the Supreme People's Court of the People's Republic of China.
- 14.
(2011) Min Si Ta Zi No. 40 Civil Ruling of the Supreme Court of the People's Republic of China.
- 15.
(2013) Hu Mao Arbitration Zi No. 415 Arbitration Award.
- 16.
(2015) Min Si Ta Zi No. 8 Civil Ruling of the Supreme Court of China.
- 17.
(2015) Zhe Shang Wai Que Zi No. 2 Civil Ruling of the Zhejiang High Court of China.
- 18.
(2016) Min Ta No. 40 Civil Ruling of the Supreme Court of the People's Republic of China.
- 19.
(2015) Zhi Shen Zi No. 33 Civil Ruling of the Supreme Court of the People's Republic of China.
- 20.
(2014) San Zhong Min Te Zi No. 07946 Civil Ruling of Beijing No.3 Intermediate Court of China.
- 21.
(2015) Shen Zhong Wai She Wai Zhong Zi No. 91 Civil Ruling of Shenzhen Intermediate Court of China.
- 22.
553 S.E.2d 84, 87–88 (N.C. App. 2001).
- 23.
No. 1:96-cv-28, 1997 WL 33,798,359 (D. Utah May 6, 1997).
- 24.
(2016) Min 02 Min Te No. 113 Civil Ruling of Xiamen Intermediate Court of China.
- 25.
(2014) Min Yi Zhong Zi No. 183 Civil Ruling of the Supreme Court of China.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Song, J., Cheng, B. (2024). Judicial Review of Arbitration Agreements. In: Foreign-Related Commercial Disputes Resolution in China. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-9081-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-9081-8_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-9080-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-9081-8
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)