Skip to main content

A Conceptual Scheme for the Double-Bind Regulatory State

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
China as a Double-Bind Regulatory State
  • 25 Accesses

Abstract

Using an inter-sub-disciplinary approach, this chapter puts together the building blocks of the “double-bind regulatory state”: autonomisation of the state power, contradiction in the regulatory objectives, and fragmented authoritarianism. It starts with a critical review of the existing regulatory approaches and discusses their weaknesses in explaining the regulatory practices in contemporary China. It introduces the theory of Michael Mann on the autonomous power of the state. This theory holds important implications for understanding Chinese politics, for, against the views of Marxists and neo-Marxists, autonomisation implies that once institutionalised, a state develops its own agenda and objectives that are independent from or even at odds with those of the ruling elites. This is also true of China. In the last part, this book analyses the sources causing the governance dilemmas of the party-state, and their implications on state-firm power relations in China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allison, Graham. 1971. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuba Missile Crisis. Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, Graham, and Morton H. Halperin. 1972. “Bureaucratic Politics: A Paradigm and Some Policy Implications.” World Politics 24: 40–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, Greg. 2014. Cyber Policy in China. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, Robert, Martin Cave, and Martin Lodge. 2010. “Introduction: Regulation—The Field and the Developing Agenda.” In The Oxford Handbook of Regulation, edited by R. Baldwin, M. Cave, and M. Lodge, 3–16. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bandurski, David. 2018. “Can the Internet and Social Media Change the Party?” In Routledge Handbook of the Chinese Communist Party, edited by W. W.-L. Lam, 372–390. Oxon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrow, Clyde W. 2002. “The Miliband-Poulantzas Debate: An Intellectual History.” In Paradigm Lost: State Theory Reconsidered, edited by S. Aranowitz and P. Bratsis, 3–52. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Béjà, Jean-Philippe. 2019. “Xi Jinping’s China: On the Road to Neo-Totalitarianism.” Social Research 86(1): 203–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benoît, Cyril. 2018. “Régulation.” In Dictionnaire d’économie politique: capitalisme, institutions, pouvoir, edited by C. Hay and A. Smith, 415–420. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Benoît, Cyril. 2020. Réguler l’accès aux médicaments. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birney, Mayling. 2013. “Decentralisation and Veiled Corruption Under China’s ‘Rule of Mandates’.” World Development 53: 55–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boullenois, Camille. 2020. “Poverty Alleviation in China: The Rise of State-Sponsored Corporate Paternalism.” China Perspectives 3: 47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabestan, Jean-Pierre. 2018. Demain la Chine: démocratie ou dictature ? Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, Christopher. 2016. “Fragmented Authoritarianism? Reforms to China’s Internet Censorship System Under Xi Jinping.” Presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting in Philadelphia, PA on 3 September 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvert, Randall L., Mathew D. McCubbins, and Barry R. Weingast. 1989. “A Theory of Political Control and Agency Discretion.” American Journal of Political Science 33(3): 588–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, Daniel P. 2001. “The Political Foundations of Bureaucratic Autonomy: A Response to Kernell.” Studies in American Political Development 15: 113–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, Daniel. 2010. Reputation and Power: Organisational Image and Pharmaceutical Regulation at the FDA. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, Daniel, and David Moss. 2014. Preventing Regulatory Capture: Special Interest Influence and How to Limit It. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chai, Yanfei. 2018. Zhejiang Gaige Kaifang 40 Nian Koushu Lishi (1978–2018) (Oral History of 40 Years of Reform and Opening-Up in Zhejiang). Hangzhou: Zhejiang Science and Technology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Feng, and Ting Gong. 1997. “Party Versus Market in Post-Mao China: The Erosion of the Leninist Organisation from Below.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 13: 148–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Duncan. 2016. Alibaba: The House that Jack Ma Built. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coglianese, Cary and David Lazer. 2003. “Management-Based Regulation: Prescribing Private Management to Achieve Public Goals.” Law & Society Review 37: 691–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, Richard, and D. W. Choy. 2005. “China’s Media: The Impact of the Internet.” San Diego International Law Journal 6(323): 323–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, Bruce. 2003. Red Capitalists in China: The Party, Private Entrepreneurs, and Prospects for Political Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, Bruce. 2007. “Integrating Wealth and Power in China: The Communist Party’s Embrace of the Private Sector.” The China Quarterly 192: 827–854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dollar, David. 2018. “The Highs and Lows of Chinese Decentralisation.” East Asia Forum, Brookings Institution, 1 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economy, Elisabeth. 2018. The Third Revolution: Xi Jinping and the New Chinese State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, Alice. 2020. Rouge Vif: l’Idéal Communiste Chinois. Paris: Editions de l’Observatoire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finez, Jean. 2014. “La construction des prix à la SNCF une socio-histoire de la tarification: de la péréquation au yield management (1938–2012).” Revue Française de Sociologie 55(1): 5–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, Diana. 2018. Mobilizing Without the Masses: Control and Contention in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony. 1981. A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Glassman, Ronald M. 1991. China in Transition: Communism, Capitalism, and Democracy. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone, Jack. 1995. “The Coming Chinese Collapse.” Foreign Policy 99: 35–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, Antonio. 1979. Letters from Prison. London: Quartet Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Garry C., and Susan S. Silbey. 2014. “Governing Inside the Organisation: Interpreting Regulation and Compliance.” American Journal of Sociology 120(1): 96–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, Harry. 1987. China's Second Revolution. Washington DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, Rongbin. 2018. Contesting Cyberspace in China: Online Expression and Authoritarian Resilience. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, Colin. 1999. “Marxism and the State.” In Marxism and Social Science, edited by A. Gamble, D. Marsh, and T. Tant, 152–174. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, Colin, and Andy Smith. 2018. “Introduction: Le Rapport Capitalisme-Politique”. In Dictionnaire d’économie politique, edited by C. Hay, and A. Smith, 19–49. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • He, Baogang, and Mark Warren. 2011. “Authoritarian Deliberation: The Deliberative Turn in Chinese Political Development.” Perspectives on Politics 9(2): 269–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hintze, Otto. 1975. The Historical Essays of Otto Hintze. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, Jude, and Tim Pringle. 2018. “Shades of Authoritarianism and State-Labour Relations in China.” British Journal of Industrial Relations 57(2): 223–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsueh, Roselyn. 2011. China’s Regulatory State: A New Strategy for Globalisation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Yong. 2008. Zhong Sheng Xuan Hua: Wang Luo Shi Dai De Ge Ren Biao Da Yu Gong Gong Tao Lun [The Rising Cacophony: Personal Expression and Public Discussion in the Internet Age]. Guilin: Guang Xi Shi Fan Da Xue Chu Ban She [Guangxi Normal University Press].

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Yasheng. 2008. Capitalism with Chinese Characteristics: Entrepreneurship and the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, Bob. 1977. “Recent Theories of the Capitalist State.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 1: 353–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Min. 2012. “Internet Companies in China: Dancing Between the Party Line and the Bottom Line.” Asie Vision 47: 1–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Min. 2014. “The Business and Politics of Search Engines: A Comparative Study of Baidu and Google’s Search Results of Internet Events in China.” New Media & Society 16(2): 212–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, Hehui, Yingyi Qian, and Barry R. Weingast. 2005. “Regional Decentralization and Fiscal Incentives: Federalism, Chinese Style.” Journal of Public Economics 89(9): 1719–1742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, S. Ryan. 1988. “The Computer Paradigm and the Role of Cultural Information in Social Systems.” Historical Methods 21: 172–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalathil, Shanthi, and Taylor C. Boas. 2003. Open Networks, Closed Regimes: The Impact of the Internet on Authoritarian Rule. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, Scott. 2011. “Fragmented Influence: Business Lobbying in China in Comparative Perspectives.” In Beyond the Middle Kingdom: Comparative Perspectives on China’s Capitalist Transformation, edited by S. Kennedy, 113–135. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koop, Christel, and Martin Lodge. 2017. “What Is Regulation? An Interdisciplinary Concept Analysis.” Regulation & Governance 11: 95–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laffont, Jean-Jacques, and Jean Tirole. 2012. Théories des incitations et réglementations. Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagerkvist, Johan. 2012. “Principal-Agent Dilemma in China’s Social Media Sector? The Party-State and Industry Real-Name Registration Waltz.” International Journal of Communication 6: 2628–2646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, Hongyi. 2016. China’s Governance Model: Flexibility and Durability of Pragmatic Authoritarianism. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landry, Pierre F. 2008. Decentralised Authoritarianism in China: The Communist Party’s Control of Local Elites in the Post-Mao Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Ching Kwan, and Zhang, Yonghong. 2013. “The power of instability: unravelling the microfoundations of bargained authoritarianism in China.” American Journal of Sociology 118(6): 1475–1508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lei, Ya-wen. 2018. The Contentious Public Sphere: Law, Media and Authoritarian Rule in China. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao, Zhixiong. 2016. “An Economic Analysis on Internet Regulation in China and Proposals to Policy and Law Makers.” International Journal of Technology Policy and Law 2(2, 3, 4): 242–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberthal, Kenneth, and Michel Oksenberg. 1988. Policy Making in China: Leaders, Structures and Processes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, Martin. 2002. On Different Tracks: Designing Railways Regulation in Britain and Germany. Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, Daniel. 1999. “Dilemmas of ‘Thought Work’ in Fin-De-Siècle China.” The China Quarterly 157: 173–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Aifang. 2018. L’intelligence artificielle en Chine: Un état des lieux. Paris: Fondation pour l’Innovation Politique.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Aifang. 2023c. La Régulation du numérique: Chine, Etats-Unis, France. Paris: Fondation pour l’Innovation Politique.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, Michael. 1984. “The Autonomous Power of the State: Its Origins, Mechanisms and Results.” European Journal of Sociology 25(2): 185–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, Michael. 2012. The Sources of Social Power 2: The Rise of Classes and Nation-States, 1760–1914. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl. 1926. The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. Translated by P. Eden. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl, and Frederick Engels. 1848. Manifesto of the Communist Party.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz, Renate. 2009. “The Changing Governance of Large Technical Infrastructure Systems.” In Über Governance: Institutionen und Prozesse politischer Regelung, edited by Renate Mayntz, 121–150. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGeary, Aaron D. 2001. “China’s Great Balancing Act: Maximizing the Internet’s Benefits While Limiting Its Detriments.” The International Lawyer 35(1): 219–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, Richard. 2010. The Party: The Secret World of China’s Communist Rulers. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendras, Henri, and Jean Etienne. 1996. Les Grands Auteurs de la Sociologie: Tocqueville, Marx, Durkheim, Weber. Paris: Hatier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertha, Andrew. 2009. “‘Fragmented Authoritarianism 2.0’: Political Pluralization in the Chinese Policy Process.” The China Quarterly 200: 995–1012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Blake. 2018. “The Limits of Commercialized Censorship in China.” Working Paper, http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/101417/1/miller_limits_of_commercialized_censorship_in_china.pdf.

  • Montinola, Gabriella, Yingyi Qian, and Barry R. Weingast. 1995. “Federalism, Chinese Style: The Political Basis for Economic Success in China.” World Politics 48(1): 50–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nathan, Andrew. 2009. “China Since Tiananmen: Authoritarian Impermanence.” Journal of Democracy 20(3): 37–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nathan, Andrew. 2003. “China’s Changing of the Guard: Authoritarian Resilience.” Journal of Democracy 14(1): 6–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naughton, Barry. 1995. Growing Out of the Plan: Chinese Economic Reform 1978–1993. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Negro, Gianluigi. 2017. The Internet in China: From Infrastructure to a Nascent Civil Society. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • North, Douglass. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oi, Jean C. 1992. “Fiscal Reform and the Economic Foundations of Local State Corporatism in China.” World Politics 45: 99–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, Kevin. 1994. “Implementing Political Reform in China’s Villages.” The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs 32: 33–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, Margaret M. 2005. “The Business of Governing Business in China: Institutions and Norms for the Emerging Regulatory State.” World Politics 57: 296–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, Elisabeth J. 2007. “Study Chinese Politics: Farewell to Revolution?” China Journal 57(1): 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poulantzas, Nicolas, and Ralph Miliband. 1972. “The Problem of the Capitalist State”. In Ideology in Social Science: Readings in Critical Social Theory, edited by Robin Blackburn, 238–262. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian, Gang, and David Bandurski. 2011. “China’s Emerging Public Sphere: The Impact of Media Commercialization, Professionalism, and the Internet in an Era of Transition.” In Changing Media, Changing China, edited by S. Shirk, 38–76. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, K. Sabeel, Thelen, Kathleen. 2019. “The Rise of the Platform Business Model and the Transformation Twenty-First-Century Capitalism.” Politics & Society 47(2): 177–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauchfleischer, Adrian and Schäfer, Mike. 2015. “Multiple Public Spheres of Weibo: A Typology of Forms and Potentials of Online Public Spheres in China.” Information, Communication & Society 18(2): 139–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringen, Stein. 2016. The Perfect Dictatorship: China in the 21st Century. Hong Kong: HKU Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Riskin, Carl. 1987. China's Political Economy: The Quest for Development since 1949. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Margaret. 2018. Censored: Distraction and Diversion Inside China’s Great Firewall. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rocca, Jean-Louis. 2006. La Condition chinoise: la mise au travail capitaliste à l’âge des réformes (1978- 2004). Paris: Karthala.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sautman, Barry. 1992. “Sirens of the Strongman: Neo-Authoritarianism in Chinese Political Theory.” The China Quarterly 129: 72–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, C. James. 1985. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, Gerald. 1994. “China Changes Shape: Regionalism and Foreign Policy: Introduction.” The Adephi Papers 34(287): 3–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shambaugh, David. 2008. China’s Communist Party: Atrophy and Adaptation. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirk, Susan. 1993. The Political Logic of Economic Reform in China. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shirk, Susan. 1985. “The Politics of Industrial Reform.” In The Political Economy of Reform in Post-Mao China, edited by E. J. Perry, and C. Wong, 195–221. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Council on East Asian Studies.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shirk, Susan. 2011. “Chapter 1: Changing Media, Changing China.” In Changing Media, Changing China, edited by S. Shirk, 1–37. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirk, Susan. 2018. “China in Xi’s ‘New Era’: The Return to Personalistic Rule.” Journal of Democracy 29(2): 22–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, Theda. 1979. States and Social Revolutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Solinger, Dorothy J. 1987. “The 1980 Inflation and the Politics of Price Control in the PRC.” In David M. Lampton (ed.), Policy Implementation in Post-Mao China. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 106–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, Rachel E., and Kevin O’Brien. 2012. “Politics at the Boundary: Mixed Signals and the Chinese State.” Modern China 38(2): 174–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, George J. 1971. “The Theory of Economic Regulation.” Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 2: 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strittmatter, Kai. 2020. Dictature 2.0: Quand la Chine surveille son people (et demain le monde). Translation by Olivier Mannoni. Paris: Tallandier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tai, Zixue. 2006. The Internet in China: Cyberspace and Civil Society. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tai, Zixue, and Tao Sun. 2007. “Media Dependencies in a Changing Media Environment: The Case of the 2003 SARS Epidemics in China.” New Media & Society 9(6): 987–1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, Wenfang. 2016. Populist Authoritarianism: Chinese Political Culture and Regime Sustainability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teets, Jessica C. 2013. “Let many civil societies bloom: the rise of consultative authoritarianism in China.” The China Quarterly 213: 19–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, Charles. 1981. As Sociology Meets History. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong, Yanqi. 2011. “Morality, Benevolence, and Responsibility: Regime Legitimacy in China from Past to the Present.” Journal of Chinese Political Science 16: 141–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, Kelley S. 2005. “Capitalists Without a Class: Political Diversity Among Private Entrepreneurs in China.” Comparative Political Studies 38(9): 1130–1158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, Lokman. 2003. “The Panopticon as the Antithesis of a Space of Freedom: Control and Regulation of the Internet in China.” China Information 17(2): 65–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max. 1946. Politics as a Vocation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society. New York: Bedminster Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max. 1998. “Class, Status and Party.” In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, edited and translated by H. H. Gerth, and C. W. Mills, 180–195. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Gordon. 1994. “Democratization and Economic Reform in China.” Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs 31: 73–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woll, Cornelia. 2008. Firm Interests: How Governments Shape Business Lobbying on Global Trade. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, Christine. 1985. “Material Allocation and Decentralization: Impact of the Local Sector on Industrial Reform.” In The Political Economy of Reform in Post- Mao China, edited by E. Perry, and C. Wong, 253–278. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, Qiang. 2011. “The Rise of Online Public Opinion and Its Political Impact.” In Changing Media, Changing China, edited by S. Shirk, 202–224. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xue, Xiaorong. 2018. Hu Lian Wang Qi Ye Dang Jian: Ji Shu Zi Ben Yu Zheng Zhi Luo Ji Zhang Li Xia De Zheng Dang Zhi Li [Party-Building in Internet Firms: Party Governance under the Logics of Technology, Capital and Politics]. Beijing: Current Affairs Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Dali. 1997. Beyond Beijing: Liberalization and the Regions in China. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Guobin. 2003. “The Co-Evolution of the Internet and Civil Society in China.” Asian Survey 43(3): 405–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Guobin. 2009a. The Power of the Internet in China: Citizen Activism Online. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Guobin. 2009b. “China Since Tiananmen: Online Activism.” Journal of Democracy 20(3): 33–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeo, Yukyung. 2020. Varieties of State Regulation: How China Regulates Its Socialist Market Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Yuezhi. 1998. Media, Market, and Democracy in China: Between the Party Line and the Bottom Line. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Yuezhi. 2000. “From Commercialization to Conglomeration: The Transformation of the Chinese Press Within the Orbit of the Party State.Journal of Communication 50(2): 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, Yongnian. 2006. De facto Federalism in China: Reforms and Dynamics of Central-Local Relations. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aifang Ma .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ma, A. (2024). A Conceptual Scheme for the Double-Bind Regulatory State. In: China as a Double-Bind Regulatory State. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8857-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics