Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Engineering Applications of Computational Methods ((EACM,volume 19))

  • 60 Accesses

Abstract

Nonlinear process is a common phenomenon in industrial processes, which shows a nonlinear relationship between the variables. Generally, PLS and its modifications (Yin et al. in IEEE Trans Industr Electron 62:1651–1658, 2015; Zhou et al. in AIChE J 56:168–178, 2010; Qin and Zheng in AIChE J 59:496–504, 2013) have a high performance when dealing with linear variation among process variables. However, when applied to a nonlinear process, which generally means that there exists a nonlinear relationship between X and Y, or the process data distributed nonlinearly, or both, these methods cannot perform well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Yin S, Zhu X, Kaynak O (2015) Improved PLS focused on key-performance-indicator-related fault diagnosis. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 62(3):1651–1658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhou DH, Li G, Qin SJ (2010) Total projection to latent structures for process monitoring. AIChE J 56(1):168–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Qin SJ, Zheng YJ (2013) Quality-relevant and process-relevant fault monitoring with concurrent projection to latent structures. AIChE J 59:496–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mejdell H, Skogestad S (1991) Estimation of distillation composition from multiple temperature measurements using partial least squares regression. Ind Eng Chem Res 30:2543–2555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wold S, Wold K, Skagerberg B (1989) Nonlinear PLS modeling. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 7:53–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sun CY, Kang HB, Ma HJ, Ba H (2021) A Key performance indicator-relevant approach based on kernel entropy component regression model for industrial system. Optimal Control Appl Methods 44:1540–1555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sun W, Wang G, Yin S, Jiao J, Guo P, Sun C (2017) Key performance indicator related fault detection based on modified KRR algorithm. In: 36th Chinese control conference (CCC), 26–28

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rosipal R, Trejo LJ (2001) Kernel partial least squares regression in reproducing kernel Hilbert space. J Mach Learn Res 2:97–123

    Google Scholar 

  9. Peng K, Zhang K, Li G (2013) Quality-related process monitoring based on total kernel PLS model and its industrial application. Math Prob Eng 1–14:2013

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sheng N, Liu Q, Qin SJ, Chai TY (2016) Comprehensive monitoring of nonlinear processes based on concurrent kernel projection to latent structures. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 13(2):1129–1137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang G, Jiao J (2017) A kernel least squares based approach for nonlinear quality-related fault detection. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 64(4):3195–3204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Huang J, Yan X (2019) Quality-driven principal component analysis combined with kernel least squares for multivariate statistical process monitoring. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 27(6):2688–2695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Si Y, Wang Y, Zhou DH (2021) Key-performance-indicator-related process monitoring based on improved kernel partial least squares. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 68(3):2626–2636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kong XY, Luo JY, Feng XW, Liu MZ (2023) A general quality-related nonlinear process monitoring approach based on input-output kernel PLS. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 72:3505712. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2023.3238692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mohri M, Rostamizadeh A, Talwalkar A (2018) Foundations of machine learning. The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England

    Google Scholar 

  16. Peng K, Zhang K, You B, Dong J (2015) Quality-relevant fault monitoring based on efficient projection to latent structures with application to hot strip mill process. IET Control Theory & Application 9(7):1135–1145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Luo JY, Kong XY, Hu CH, Li HZ (2021) Key-performance-indicators-related fault subspace extraction for the reconstruction-based fault diagnosis. Measurement 186:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sun CY, Yin YZ, Kang HB, Ma HJ (2022) A Distributed principal component regression method for quality-related fault detection and diagnosis. Inf Sci 600:301–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cárcel CR, Cao Y, Mba D, Lao L, Samuel RT (2015) Statistical process monitoring of a multiphase flow facility. Control Eng Pract 42:74–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 Science Press

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kong, X., Luo, J., Feng, X. (2024). Quality-Related Complex Nonlinear Process Monitoring. In: Process Monitoring and Fault Diagnosis Based on Multivariable Statistical Analysis. Engineering Applications of Computational Methods, vol 19. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8775-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics