Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Engineering Applications of Computational Methods ((EACM,volume 19))

  • 62 Accesses

Abstract

Data-driven process monitoring techniques (Ge in Chemom Intell Lab Syst 171:16–25, 2017; Ge and Song in Multivariate statistical process control: process monitoring methods and applications. Springer, 2013; Yin et al. in IEEE Trans Industr Electron 62:657–667, 2015; Ding in J Process Control 24:431–449, 2014) are very popular in industrial process safety detection due to their easy implementation and low requirements for the underlying model. The PCA (Jolliffe in Principal component analysis, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1986) and PLS (Wold et al. in Pattern regression finding and using regularities in multivariate data, U. K., Applied Science, London, 1983) are two typical MSPC methods for monitoring process security by projecting measurements into a low-dimensional space and constructing Q statistics and T2 statistics (Qin in Annual Review of Control 36:220–234, 2012). When an abnormal variable occurs in an industrial process, there are two possible scenarios. One is that the fault directly affects the output variables, which needs to be alarmed in time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ge ZQ (2017) Review on data-driven modeling and monitoring for plant-wide industrial processes. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 171:16–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ge ZQ, Song ZH (2013) Multivariate statistical process control: process monitoring methods and applications. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yin S, Li X, Gao H, Kaynak O (2015) Data-based techniques focused on modern industry: an overview. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 62(1):657–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ding SX (2014) Data-driven design of monitoring and diagnosis systems for dynamic processes: a review of subspace technique based schemes and some recent results. J Process Control 24(2):431–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jolliffe IT (1986) Principal component analysis. Springer, New York, NY, USA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Wold S, Albano C, Dunn M (1983) Pattern regression finding and using regularities in multivariate data. U. K., Applied Science, London

    Google Scholar 

  7. Qin SJ (2012) Survey on data-driven industrial process monitoring and diagnosis. Ann Rev Control 36(2):220–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhou DH, Li G, Qin SJ (2010) Total projection to latent structures for process monitoring. AIChE J 56(1):168–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yin S, Ding SX, Zhang P, Hagahni A, Naik A (2011) Study on modifications of PLS approach for process monitoring. IFAC Proc 44(1):12389–12394

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wold S (1994) Exponentially weighted moving principal components analysis and projections to latent structures. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 23(1):149–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dayal BS, Macgregor JF (1997) Recursive exponentially weighted PLS and its applications to adaptive control and prediction. J Process Control 7(3):169–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Helland K, Berntsen HE, Borgen OS, Martens H (1992) Recursive algorithm for partial least squares regression. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 14(1–3):129–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Qin SJ (1998) Recursive PLS algorithms for adaptive data modeling. Comput Chem Eng 22(4–5):503–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dong J, Zhang K, Huang Y, Li G, Peng K (2015) Adaptive total PLS based quality-relevant process monitoring with application to the Tennessee Eastman process. Neurocomputing 154:77–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Qin SJ, Zheng YY (2013) Quality-relevant and process-relevant fault monitoring with concurrent projection to latent structures. AIChE J 59(2):496–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Peng K, Zhang K, You B, Dong J (2015) Quality-relevant fault monitoring based on efficient projection to latent structures with application to hot strip mill process. IET Control Theory & Application 9(7):1135–1145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kong XY, Luo JY, Xu ZY, Li HZ (2019) Quality-relevant data-driven process monitoring based on orthogonal signal correction and recursive modified PLS. IEEE Access 7:117934–117943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hu CH, Xu ZY, Kong XY, Luo JY (2019) Recursive-CPLS-based quality-relevant and process -relevant fault monitoring with application to the TEP. IEEE Access 7:128746–128757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wold S, Kettaneh-Wold N, Skagerberg B (1989) Nonlinear PLS modeling. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 7(1–2):53–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wold S, Antti H, Lindgren F, Öhman J (1998) Orthogonal signal correction of near- infrared spectra. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 44(1–2):175–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yin S, Wang G, Gao H (2016) Data-driven process monitoring based on modified orthogonal projections to latent structures. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 24(4):1480–1487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang G, Yin S (2015) Quality-related fault detection approach based on orthogonal signal correction and modified PLS. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 11(2):398–405

    Google Scholar 

  23. Downs JJ, Vogel EF (1993) A plant-wide industrial process control security problem. Comput Chem Eng 17(3):245–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yin S, Ding SX, Xie X, Luo H (2014) A review on basic data-driven approaches for industrial process monitoring. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 61(11):6418–6428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhong B, Wang J, Zhou J, Wu H, Jin Q (2016) Quality-related statistical process monitoring method based on global and local partial leasts quares projection. Ind Eng Chem Res 55(6):1609–1622

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 Science Press

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kong, X., Luo, J., Feng, X. (2024). Quality-Related Time-Varying Process Monitoring. In: Process Monitoring and Fault Diagnosis Based on Multivariable Statistical Analysis. Engineering Applications of Computational Methods, vol 19. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8775-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics