Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Robot Companions and Sensors for Better Living: Defining Needs to Empower Low Socio-economic Older Adults at Home

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Robotics (ICSR 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 14453 ))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 561 Accesses

Abstract

Population ageing has profound implications for economies and societies, demanding increased health and social services. The global older adult population is steadily growing, presenting challenges. Addressing this reality, investing in older adults’ healthcare means enhancing their well-being while minimizing expenditures. Strategies aim to support older adults at home, but resource disparities pose challenges. Importantly, socio-economic factors influence peoples’ quality of life and wellbeing, thus they are associated with specific needs. Socially Assistive Robots (SARs) and monitoring technologies (wearable and environmental sensors) hold promise in aiding daily life, with older adults showing willingness to embrace them, particularly if tailored to their needs. Despite research on perceptions of technology, the preferences and needs of socio-economically disadvantaged older adults remain underexplored. This study investigates how SARs and sensor technologies can aid low-income older adults, promoting independence and overall well-being. For this purpose, older adults (aged ≥ 65 years) with low income were recruited, and a series of focus groups were conducted to comprehend how these technologies could address their needs. Thematic analysis results highlighted five key dimensions, specifically: 1) promote and monitor an active lifestyle, 2) help with daily errands and provide physical assistance, 3) reduce isolation and loneliness, 4) considerations regarding monitoring technologies, and 5) barriers affecting SARs and monitoring technologies usage and acceptance. These dimensions should be considered during SARs and sensors design to effectively meet users’ requirements, enhance their quality of life, and support caregivers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Office for National Statistics: Living longer: is age 70 the new age 65? https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/ageing/articles/livinglongerisage70thenewage65/2019-11-19. Accessed 31 July 2023

  2. The United Nations (UN): World population prospects: the 2017 revision. United Nations Econ SocAff, ed. WPN ESA/P/WP/248. United Nations, New York (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Donovan, N.J., Blazer, D.: Social isolation and loneliness in older adults: review and commentary of a national academies report. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 28(12), 1233–1244 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Park, D.C., Gutchess, A.H., Meade, M.L., Stine-Morrow, E.A.: Improving cognitive function in older adults: Nontraditional approaches. J. Gerontol. Ser. B: Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 62(Special_Issue_1), 45–52 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hou, Y., et al.: Ageing as a risk factor for neurodegenerative disease. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 15(10), 565–581 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Holland, G.J., Tanaka, K., Shigematsu, R., Nakagaichi, M.: Flexibility and physical functions of older adults: a review. J. Aging Phys. Act. 10(2), 169–206 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bloom, D.E., et al.: Macroeconomic implications of population ageing and selected policy responses. Lancet 385(9968), 649–657 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Prince, M.J., et al.: The burden of disease in older people and implications for health policy and practice. Lancet 385(9967), 549–562 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhou, W., Oyegoke, A.S., Sun, M.: Service planning and delivery outcomes of home adaptations for ageing in the UK. J. Housing Built Environ. 34, 365–383 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Snowden, M., et al.: Effect of exercise on cognitive performance in community-dwelling older adults: Review of intervention trials and recommendations for public health practice and research. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 59(4), 704–716 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Braveman, P., Gottlieb, L.: The social determinants of health: it’s time to consider the causes of the causes. Publ. Health Rep. 129(1_suppl2), 19–31 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Choi, N.G., McDougall, G.: Unmet needs and depressive symptoms among low-income older adults. J. Gerontol. Soc. Work 52(6), 567–583 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hayajneh, A.A., Rababa, M.: The association of frailty with poverty in older adults: a systematic review. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord. 50(5), 407–413 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bookwala, J., Zdaniuk, B., Burton, L., Lind, B., Jackson, S., Schulz, R.: Concurrent and long-term predictors of older adults’ use of community-based long-term care services: the caregiver health effects study. J. Aging Health 16(1), 88–115 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wolff, J.L., Spillman, B.C., Freedman, V.A., Kasper, J.D.: A national profile of family and unpaid caregivers who assist older adults with health care activities. JAMA Intern. Med. 176(3), 372–379 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cavallo, F., et al.: Robotic services acceptance in smart environments with older adults: user satisfaction and acceptability study. J. Med. Internet Res. 20(9), e9460 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Camp, N., et al.: Perceptions of socially assistive robots among community-dwelling older adults. In: Cavallo, F., et al. (eds.) Social Robotics: 14th International Conference, ICSR 2022, pp. 540–549. Springer, Heidelberg (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24670-8_48

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Arras, K.O., Cerqui, D.: Do we want to share our lives and bodies with robots? A 2000 people survey: a 2000-people survey. Tech. Rep. 605 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Camp, N., et al.: Perceptions of in-home monitoring technology for activities of daily living: semistructured interview study with community-dwelling older adults. JMIR Aging 5(2), e33714 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tinker, A., Lansley, P.: Introducing assistive technology into the existing homes of older people: feasibility, acceptability, costs and outcomes. J. Telemed. Telecare 11(1_suppl), 1–3 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pain, H., Gale, C.R., Watson, C., Cox, V., Cooper, C., Sayer, A.A.: Readiness of elders to use assistive devices to maintain their independence in the home. Age Ageing 36(4), 465–467 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang, J., Geng, L.: Effects of socioeconomic status on physical and psychological health: lifestyle as a mediator. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16(2), 281 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Smakman, M.H., Konijn, E.A., Vogt, P., Pankowska, P.: Attitudes towards social robots in education: enthusiast, practical, troubled, sceptic, and mindfully positive. Robotics 10(1), 24 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fracasso, F., Buchweitz, L., Theil, A., Cesta, A., Korn, O.: Social robots acceptance and marketability in Italy and Germany: a cross-national study focusing on assisted living for older adults. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 14(6), 1463–1480 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Age UK: Briefing Poverty in later life. https://www.ageuk.org.uk/globalassets/age-uk/documents/reports-and-publications/reports-and-briefings/money-matters/poverty-in-later-life-briefing-june-2023.pdf. Accessed 09 Oct 2023

  26. Candela, F., Zucchetti, G., Magistro, D.: Individual correlates of autonomy in activities of daily living of institutionalized elderly individuals: an exploratory study in a holistic perspective. Holist. Nurs. Pract. 27(5), 284–291 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Scherer, M.J.: The change in emphasis from people to person: introduction to the special issue on assistive technology. Disabil. Rehabil. 24(1–3), 1–4 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pino, M. C., Vagnetti, R., Tiberti, S., Valenti, M., Mazza, M.: Involving autism stakeholders in identifying priorities for interventions based on augmented reality. Disabil. Rehabil.: Assist. Technol., 1–9 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Francis-Devine, B.: Poverty in the UK: Statistics. (2022). https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn07096/. Accessed 31 July 2023

  30. Acocella, I.: The focus groups in social research: advantages and disadvantages. Qual. Quant. 46, 1125–1136 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3(2), 77–101 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Magistro, D., Candela, F., Brustio, P.R., Liubicich, M.E., Rabaglietti, E.: A longitudinal study on the relationship between aerobic endurance and lower body strength in Italian sedentary older adults. J. Aging Phys. Act. 23(3), 444–451 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Candela, F., Zucchetti, G., Ortega, E., Rabaglietti, E., Magistro, D.: Preventing loss of basic activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living in elderly. Holist. Nurs. Pract. 29(5), 313–322 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Camp, N., et al.: Technology used to recognize activities of daily living in community-dwelling older adults. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18(1), 163 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Magistro, D., et al.: A novel algorithm for determining the contextual characteristics of movement behaviors by combining accelerometer features and wireless beacons: development and implementation. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 6(4), e8516 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Candela, F., Zucchetti, G., Magistro, D., Ortega, E., Rabaglietti, E.: Real and perceived physical functioning in Italian elderly population: associations with BADL and IADL. Adv. Aging Res. 3, 349–359 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ciuffreda, I., et al.: Design and development of a technological platform based on a sensorized social robot for supporting older adults and caregivers: GUARDIAN ecosystem. Int. J. Soc. Robot. (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Liu, B., Tetteroo, D., Timmermans, A., Markopoulos, P.: Exploring older adults’ acceptance, needs, and design requirements towards applying social robots in a rehabilitation context. In: 2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 1077–1084. IEEE (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Cesta, A., Cortellessa, G., Fracasso, F., Orlandini, A., Turno, M.: User needs and preferences on AAL systems that support older adults and their carers. J. Ambient Intell. Smart Environ. 10(1), 49–70 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the EPSRC and NIHR (grant number EP/W031809/1, IMACTIVE).

Open access. For the purpose of open access, the authors have applied a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sport, Health and Performance Enhancement Research Centre, Department of Sport Science, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK

    Roberto Vagnetti, Nicola Camp & Daniele Magistro

  2. Department of Computing and Advanced Wellbeing Research Centre, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK

    Matthew Story, Joshua Bamforth & Alessandro Di Nuovo

  3. Wolfson School of Mechanical, Electrical and Manufacturing Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK

    Khaoula Ait-Belaid & Massimiliano Zecca

  4. Department of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK

    Suvo Mitra

Authors
  1. Roberto Vagnetti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nicola Camp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Matthew Story
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Khaoula Ait-Belaid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Joshua Bamforth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Massimiliano Zecca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Alessandro Di Nuovo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Suvo Mitra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Daniele Magistro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto Vagnetti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Qatar University, Doha, Qatar

    Abdulaziz Al Ali

  2. Qatar University, Doha, Qatar

    John-John Cabibihan

  3. Qatar University, Doha, Qatar

    Nader Meskin

  4. University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy

    Silvia Rossi

  5. Qingdao University, Qingdao, China

    Wanyue Jiang

  6. The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA

    Hongsheng He

  7. National University of Singapore, Queenstown, Singapore

    Shuzhi Sam Ge

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Vagnetti, R. et al. (2024). Robot Companions and Sensors for Better Living: Defining Needs to Empower Low Socio-economic Older Adults at Home. In: Ali, A.A., et al. Social Robotics. ICSR 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 14453 . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8715-3_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8715-3_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-8714-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-8715-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation