Abstract
The current density of proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEM-FCs) is directly linked to their electrochemical reaction. Its distribution over the active area can give the local performance of the cells, which is significant for exploration of internal process and optimization of performance. In this paper, segmented cell technology is applied to investigate the current density distribution for a commercial PEMFC with different clamping strategies. The stress distribution and current density distribution as well as the overall performance of the cell are tested under the same operating conditions. The results show that a more uniform stress distribution can lead to a more uniform reaction current density distribution and the good uniformity of the stress distribution and current density distribution has a positive impact on the improvement of the cell overall performance. Thus, it is significant to improve the clamping strategy in order to improve the uniformity of the stress distribution and reaction current density distribution, which ultimately improves the cell overall performance.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download conference paper PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Commercial proton exchange membrane fuel cells
- Clamping strategies
- Stress distribution
- Contact form
- Current density distribution
1 Introduction
The PEMFC is regarded as one of the most promising power sources for vehicles and various portable electronic applications due to its high energy conversion rate, high reliability and low pollution emission in operation [1]. Currently, commercial fuel cells usually need hundreds of cells and large active area for each single cell to realize high power applications [2]. Scaling up the active area from no more than 50Â cm2 in laboratory level to over 150 cm2 for commercial use encounters challenges in reaction gas flow distribution, water-heat management, and reaction uniformity [3]. In order to optimize the design of commercial PEMFC, it is necessary to carefully consider the coupling relationship of various uneven parameters such as temperature, reaction gas concentration, stress distribution and current density distribution [4].
Conventional fuel cell diagnostic methods such as polarization curve can give an overall performance but lack of spatial information at different positions for the large reaction active area. As current density is directly linked to electrochemical reaction of fuel cells, its distribution over the active area can give the local performance of the cells [5]. Thus, relevant diagnostic methods need to be developed to obtain the current density distribution in the reaction process of commercial PEMFCs with large active area. So far, various researches have been conducted to investigate the current density distribution inside PEMFCs with large active area. In order to study the influence of relative humidity (RH) on the performance and durability of reversal-tolerant-anodes (RTAs) during hydrogen starvation, Wang et al. [6] employed an advanced segmented technique to examine the coupling reactions by simultaneously measuring current density, RH and temperature in a PEMFC with large active area. It is found that the inlet of RTAs undergoes degradation earlier than the outlet and the membrane electrode assembly (MEA) with a RTA has an optimal humidity during cell reversal. Lin et al. [7] studied the changes of the overall performance and current density distribution of commercial PEMFCs under dynamic gas operating parameters especially transient process through fast segmented cell technology. The results showed that the cathode stoichiometric ratio has a more significant effect on the cell performance than the back pressure. The work leads to suggestions on the control strategy during dynamic load demands and lays a foundation for further study into the durability under variable gas operation parameters of the fuel cell operation.
Moreover, some researches have been conducted to study the relationship between stress distribution and current density distribution as well as the cell overall performance. Vijayakumar et al. [8] measured the current distribution profile along the cathode flow field channel using a segmented current measurement plate to understand the influence of uneven clamping pressure distribution on the MEA. Although scholars have done some research on the relationship between the stress distribution and the current density distribution affected by the clamping force, few studies on the stress distribution and its relationship with the current density distribution caused by the cell structure and clamping strategy have been conducted so far inside commercial PEMFCs with large active area.
In this work, two different clamping strategies are applied to a commercial PEMFC with the active area of 360 cm2. The current density distribution is tested by segmented cell technology (from Yuanzhu technology, www.szfcet.com) and the stress distribution is obtained. The results of both strategies are compared not only to analyze the influence of different structures on stress distribution but also to examine the relationship between stress distribution and current density distribution as well as the cell overall performance.
2 Experimental Part
The research is carried out on a commercial single PEMFC with the active area of 360 cm2 with two different clamping strategies (strategy 1 and strategy 2) under the standard operating conditions. The conditions contain: coolant temperature of 75℃, anode/cathode back pressure of 100/95 kPa, anode/cathode stoichiometry of 1.5/2.2, anode/cathode RH of 80%/80%. The segmented cell technology is from Yuanzhu technology (www.szfcet.com), which is applied to test the current density distribution of the fuel cell and the stress distribution is obtained by pressure measurement film.
3 Results and Discussion
3.1 Influence of Different Structures on Stress Distribution
Figure 1 analyzes the influence of different structures on stress distribution. It can be found that the stress distribution of the cell with strategy 1 (Fig. 1(a)) is less uniform than the stress distribution of the cell with strategy 2 (Fig. 1(b)). As shown in Fig. 1(c), the contact interface of the cell with strategy 1 can be divided into two parts. One is the area where the ribs on the contact interface are vertical to each other (the triangle areas of Fig. 1(c)), and the other is the area where the ribs on the contact interface are parallel to each other (the oval areas of Fig. 1 (c)). Comparing the stress distribution and the flow field structure on the contact interface, we can find that the contact where ribs are vertical to each other is better than that where ribs are parallel to each other. In vertical areas, the ribs and channels on both sides of the interface are interlaced. The contact forms of the interface can be divided into three types: rib to rib, rib to channel, channel to channel (Fig. 1(e, f)). From Fig. 1(a) we can find that both the rib-to-rib form and the rib-to-channel form can achieve good contact stress, while the channel-to-channel form gains poor contact. As most of the vertical areas are rib-to-rib and rib-to-channel forms, these areas generally result in good contact. On the other hand, the parallel areas only have rib-to-rib and channel-to-channel forms. And as the proportion of the channel-to-channel form which has poor contact is considerably large (near 50%), the parallel areas generally result in poor contact. As shown in Fig. 1(b), the interface of the cell with strategy 2 only has rib-to-channel and rib-to-rib forms (Fig. 1(e)). Thus, the stress distribution on the entire contact interface is more uniform and generally better.
3.2 Relationship Between Stress Distribution and Current Density Distribution
Figure 2 shows the current density distribution of the cell with two clamping strategies at 1000 mA/cm2 respectively, which investigates the relationship between stress distribution and current density distribution. As shown in Fig. 2(a), it is found that the local current density in some areas (the oval areas of Fig. 2(a)) is lower than the normal value. It can be found from the stress distribution and flow field structure in Fig. 1(c) that these low current density areas are consistent with the poor contact areas (parallel areas). Therefore, the local poor contact may affect the reaction in these areas and lead to low local current density. On the other hand, by comparing the triangle areas of the stress distribution (Fig. 1 (c)) and the current density distribution (Fig. 2(a)), the results show that local good contact contributes to the reaction in these areas, which leads to the increase of local current density. Moreover, the current density distribution of the cell with strategy 2 (Fig. 2(b)) is much more uniform than that of the cell with strategy 1 (Fig. 2(a)). By combining the phenomenon with the stress distribution of the cells with two clamping strategies respectively (Fig. 1(a) and (b)), we can find that a more uniform stress distribution can lead to a more uniform reaction current density distribution.
3.3 Relationship Between Current Density Distribution and the Cell Overall Performance
As shown in Fig. 3, the red line is the polarization curve of strategy 2, and the black line is the polarization curve of strategy 1. It can be found that the overall performance of the cell with strategy 2 is better than that of the cell with strategy 1, especially at medium and low current density region. Since the stress distribution and current density distribution of the cell with strategy 2 is more uniform than that of strategy 1 (Figs. 1 and 2), it can be deduced that the well uniformity of the stress distribution and current density distribution has a positive impact on the improvement of the cell overall performance.
4 Conclusions
In this study, two different clamping strategies are applied to a commercial PEMFC with the active area of 360 cm2. The stress distribution and current density distribution as well as the overall performance of the cell in both cases are tested under the same operating conditions. The results show that the vertical areas where rib-to-rib and rib-to-channel forms occupy the majority have good contact while the parallel areas where the proportion of the channel-to-channel form which has poor contact is considerably large have poor contact, which leads to the uneven stress distribution of the cell with strategy 1. The cell with strategy 2 of which the contact interface only has rib-to-channel and rib-to-rib forms has more uniform and generally better stress distribution on the entire contact interface. By comparing the relationship between the stress distribution and the current density distribution of both strategies, it is found that a more uniform stress distribution can lead to a more uniform reaction current density distribution. From the results of the overall performance of the cells in both strategies, it can be considered that the good uniformity of the stress distribution and current density distribution has a positive impact on the improvement of the cell overall performance. Thus, it is significant to improve the clamping strategy and the contact form of the flow field in order to improve the uniformity of the stress distribution and reaction current density distribution, and ultimately improve the cell overall performance.
References
Lin, R., Yu, X.T., Chen, L., et al.: Structure majorization on the surface of microporous layer in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells to optimize performance and durability. Energy Conv Manage 243, 114319 (2021)
Shimpalee, S., Hirano, S., Debolt, M., et al.: Macro-scale analysis of large scale PEM fuel cell flow-fields for automotive applications. J. Electrochem. Soc. 164(11), E3073 (2017)
Peng, L., Shao, H., Qiu, D., et al.: Investigation of the non-uniform distribution of current density in commercial-size proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J. Power. Sour. 453, 227836 (2020)
Wu, H.-W., Shih, G.-J., Chen, Y.-B.: Effect of operational parameters on transport and performance of a PEM fuel cell with the best protrusive gas diffusion layer arrangement. Appl. Energy 220, 47–58 (2018)
Belhadj, M., Aquino, A., Heng, J., et al.: Current density distributions in polymer electrolyte fuel cells: a tool for characterisation of gas distribution in the cell and its state of health. Chem. Eng. Sci. 185, 18–25 (2018)
Wang, Y., Xie, X., Zhou, C., et al.: Study of relative humidity on durability of the reversal tolerant proton exchange membrane fuel cell anode using a segmented cell. J. Power. Sour. 449, 227542 (2020)
Ma, Y.Y., Lin, R., Hou, Z.J., et al.: Research on the variation of current density distribution in a commercial-size proton exchange membrane fuel cell under dynamic gas operation parameters. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 196, 123287 (2022)
Vijayakumar, R., Ramkumar, T., Maheswari, S., et al.: Current and clamping pressure distribution studies on the scale up issues in direct methanol fuel cells. Electrochim. Acta 90, 274–282 (2013)
Acknowledgement
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support by Key projects of intergovernmental international scientific and technological innovation cooperation (No. 2022YFE0102900) and the International Cooperation Program of Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (No. 22160712100).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s)
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ji, W., Lin, R. (2024). Relationship Between Stress Distribution and Current Density Distribution on Commercial Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells. In: Sun, H., Pei, W., Dong, Y., Yu, H., You, S. (eds) Proceedings of the 10th Hydrogen Technology Convention, Volume 1. WHTC 2023. Springer Proceedings in Physics, vol 393. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8631-6_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8631-6_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-8630-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-8631-6
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)