Skip to main content

A Blockchain-based Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Framework for Building Materials Selection

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Blockchain in Real Estate

Abstract

Real estate companies wishing to deploy blockchain-based solutions are faced with a plethora of competing technologies, each with a large number of unique parameters that must be adjusted by an expert. In this article, we propose A blockchain-based Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) framework to guide the choice of construction materials. LCA is a multi-criteria evaluation method based on ISO 14040 and 14044 standards and which can be based on additional standards depending on the sector studied and the objectives of the study. It aims to produce an assessment of the potential environmental impacts of a product or activity. It is characterized by a holistic approach to the problem, considering the entire life cycle of the product(s) studied. We build a knowledge base of blockchain solutions and run an automated multi-criteria decision process giving the most relevant solution based on requirements and preferences. We validate our approach on a building material case study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    POA Clique: https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/issues/225.

References

  • Allen, I. E., & Seaman, C. A. (2007). Likert scales and data analyses. Quality Progress, 40(7), 64–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cachin, C., & Vukolic, M. (2017). Blockchains consensus protocols in the wild. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.01873.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erol, I., & Oztel, A., Searcy, C., & Medeni, Ä°. T. (2023). Selecting the most suitable blockchain platform: A case study on the healthcare industry using a novel rough MCDM framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 186, 122132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farshidi, S., Jansen, S., España, S., & Verkleij, J. (2020). Decision support for blockchain platform selection: Three industry case studies. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 67, 1109–1128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J. (2008). Combining entropy weight and TOPSIS method for information system selection. In 2008 IEEE Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent Systems (pp. 1281–1284). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornyshova, E., & Salinesi, C. (2007). MCDM techniques selection approaches: State of the art. In 2007 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Multi-criteria Decision-making (pp. 22–29). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labazova, O. (2019). Towards a framework for evaluation of Blockchain implementations. In ICIS 2019 Proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, Y.-J., Liu, T.-Y., & Hwang, C.-L. (1994). Topsis for MODM. European Journal of Operational Research, 76(3), 486–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longo, F., Nicoletti, L., Padovano, A., d’Atri, G., & Forte, M. (2019). Blockchain-enabled supply chain: An experimental study. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 136, 57–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system.** Szabo, N. (1997). Formalizing and securing relationships on public networks. First Monday, 2(9).

    Google Scholar 

  • Patil, K., Divesh, O., Elisabeth, M. S., & Pankaj, P. C. (2023). Behavioral drivers of blockchain assimilation in supply chains—A social network theory perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 192, 122578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray S. (2019). Blockchains versus traditional databases [online]. https://hackernoon.com/blockchains-versus-traditional-databases-c1a728159f79. Accessed 1 July 2019.

  • Ren, Y.-S., Ma, C. Q., Chen, X.-Q., Lei, Y. T., & Wang, Y.-R. (2023). Sustainable finance and blockchain: A systematic review and research agenda. Research in International Business and Finance, 64, 101871.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, M., Mueller-Bloch, C., Thatcher, J. B., & Beck, R. (2019). Blockchain research in information systems: Current trends and an inclusive future research agenda. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 20(9), 1388–1403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saberi, S., Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., & Shen, L. (2018). Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), 2117–2135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedlmeir, J., Lautenschlager, J., Fridgen, G., et al. (2022). The transparency challenge of blockchain in organizations. Electron Markets, 32, 1779–1794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-022-00536-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shari, F. M., & Malip, A. (2023). Blockchain-based decentralized data dissemination scheme in smart transportation. Journal of Systems Architecture, 134, 102800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, H., Shi, Y., & Dong, P. (2019). Public blockchain evaluation using entropy and TOPSIS. Expert Systems with Applications, 117, 204–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapscott, D. (2016). Blockchain revolution: How the technology behind bitcoin is changing money, business, and the world. Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toufaily, E., Zalan, T., & Dhaou, S. B. (2021). A framework of blockchain technology adoption: An investigation of challenges and expected value. Information & Management, 58(3), 103444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2021.103444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, G., et al. (2014). Ethereum: A secure decentralised generalised transaction ledger. Ethereum Project Yellow Paper, 151(2014), 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, X., Pautasso, C., Zhu, L., Lu, Q., & Weber, I. (2018). A pattern collection for blockchain-based applications. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H.-N., Chen, X., & Wang H. (2017). An overview of blockchain technology: Architecture, consensus, and future trends. In IEEE BigData Congress.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nesrine Gaaliche .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gaaliche, N., Elseoud, M.A. (2024). A Blockchain-based Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Framework for Building Materials Selection. In: Jreisat, A., Mili, M. (eds) Blockchain in Real Estate. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8533-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics