Skip to main content

Strength Analysis of Geotextile-Reinforced Subgrade

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Best Practices in Geotechnical and Pavement Engineering (IACESD 2023)

Abstract

Subgrade’s poor strength is a common challenge in many road projects. Several materials are used as admixtures to reinforce the subgrade. However, geotextiles are one of the best solutions for reinforcement in the soil. In this work, an investigation of the strengths of subgrades reinforced with jute textile and polypropylene (PP) geotextile is the topic of a comparative study. On both reinforced and non-reinforced soil, tests called the direct shear test (DST) and California bearing ratio (CBR) are conducted. This geotextile’s positioning demonstrates how crucial it is to the subgrade’s overall strength. According to the test results, jute textile (natural fibre) increased the soil sample’s shear strength. Contrarily, the soil’s shear strength decreased when it was reinforced with polypropylene geotextile (synthetic fibre). Selecting D/2, D/3, and D/4 as the placement depths from the top surface for the geotextile, a single, double, and triple layer of geotextile is used to reinforce soil samples for the CBR test. The double-layer reinforcement at depths D/3 and D/4 shows optimum strength.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Singh M, Trivedi A, Shukla SK (2019) Strength enhancement of the subgrade soil of unpaved road with geosynthetic reinforcement layers. Transp Geotech 19:54–60

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mohan R, Gupta A, Gaur K (2021) Utilization of bitumen, aggregate and wax with rubber tyre in a flexible pavement. In: International conference on advances in civil engineering, vol 1197, no 1, p 012017

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kumar Y, Trivedi A, Shukla SK (2023) Damage evaluation in pavement-geomaterial system using finite element-scaled accelerated pavement testing transp. Infrastruct Geotech. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-023-00309-y

  4. Hossain AM, Adnan A, Alam AM (2015) Improvement of granular subgrade soil by using geotextile and jute fiber. Int J Sci Technol Soc 3(5):230–235

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sudarsanan N, Karpurapu R, Amirthalingam V (2015) The use of natural geotextiles in reinforcing the unpaved roads. Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai-600 036, India

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mittal A, Shukla S (2019) Effect of geosynthetic reinforcement on strength behaviour of weak subgrade soil. Mater Sci Forum 969:225–230. (Trans Tech Publications Ltd., Switzerland)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Viveka T, Kumar SN, Chamberlin SK (2021) Stabilization of slopes of sandy soils by using geosynthetics. In: International conference on advances in civil engineering, vol 1197, p 012081. Guntur, India

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shukla S, Mittal A (2022) Effect of jute fibre reinforcement on strength, thickness and cost of low-volume rural roads. Mater Today Proc 62(Part 12):6749–6754

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rashidian V, Naeini AS, Mirzakhanlari M (2018) Laboratory testing and numerical modelling on bearing capacity of geotextile-reinforced granular soils. Int J Geotech Eng 12(3):241–251

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bergado DT, Youwai S, Hai CN, Voottipruex P (2001) Interaction of nonwoven needle-punched geotextiles under axisymmetric loading conditions. Geotext Geomembr 19:299–328

    Google Scholar 

  11. Singh M, Trivedi A, Shukla SK (2020) Influence of geosynthetic reinforcement on unpaved roads based on CBR, and static and dynamic cone penetration tests. Int J Geosynthetics Ground Eng 6(2):13

    Google Scholar 

  12. Singh M, Trivedi A, Shukla SK (2020) Unpaved test sections reinforced with geotextile and geogrid. Mater Today Proc 32(Part 4):706–711

    Google Scholar 

  13. Singh M, Trivedi A, Shukla SK (2020) Fuzzy-based model for predicting strength of geogrid-reinforced subgrade soil with optimal depth of geogrid reinforcement. Transp Infrastruct Geotechnol 7:664–683

    Google Scholar 

  14. Giroud JP, Han J (2004) Design method for geogrid-reinforced unpaved roads. I. Development of design method. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 130(8):775–786

    Google Scholar 

  15. Alobaidi I, Hoare DJ (1998) The role of geotextile reinforcement in the control of pumping at the subgrade-subbase interface of highway pavements. Geosythetic Int 5(6):619–636

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tingle JS, Jersey SR (2005) Cyclic plate load testing of geosythetic-reinforced unbounded aggregate roads. In: Transportation research record: journal of the transportation research board, No. 1936, transportation research board of the national academies. Washington, D.C, pp 60–69

    Google Scholar 

  17. Raja MNA, Shukla SK, Khan MUA (2021) An intelligent approach for predicting the strength of geosythetic-reinforced subgrade soil. Int J Pavement Eng 23(10)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Al-Refeai TO (2000) Behavior of geotextile reinforced sand on weak subgrade. J King Saud Univ Eng Sci 12(2):219–232

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hasan M, Samadhiya NK (2017) Performance of geosynthetic-reinforced granular piles in soft clays: model tests and numerical analysis. Comput Geotech 87:178–187

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shekhawat P, Sharma G, Singh RM (2023) Strength characteristics of hazardous wastes flyash and eggshell powder-based geopolymer-stabilized soft soil cured at ambient temperature. Arab J Geosci 16:127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-023-11234-2

  21. Shekhawat P, Sharma G, Singh RM (2023) Morphology and microstructure of waste material-based geopolymer with flyash, eggshell powder, and soft soil. Mater Lett 334:133621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2022.133621

  22. Hasan M, Samadhiya NK (2016) 3D numerical analysis of granular piles with internal horizontal geogrid strips in layers. In: Proceedings of national conference on Indian geotechnical conference (IGC), IIT Madras, Chennai, India

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pradeep Kumar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kumar, P., Gaur, K., Trivedi, A. (2024). Strength Analysis of Geotextile-Reinforced Subgrade. In: Kolathayar, S., Vinod Chandra Menon, N., Sreekeshava, K.S. (eds) Best Practices in Geotechnical and Pavement Engineering. IACESD 2023. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 449. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8505-0_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8505-0_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-8504-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-8505-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics