Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Factors Impact on Private Institution Nursing Students’ Perception and Satisfaction of the Clinical Learning Environment in Northern Region of Malaysia

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Research in Management and Technovation (ICRMAT 2023)

Included in the following conference series:

  • 38 Accesses

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to focus on finding the factors playing a vital role that impact Nursing Students’ Perceptions and Satisfaction of the Clinical Learning Environment in the Northern Region of Malaysia. The motivation of this research could extend and enrich the knowledge of nursing education, in terms of nursing clinical performance. The theoretical framework is developed based on the CLEST model to enhance and justify its relevancy as a guide for future researchers in determining and selecting variables in similar or related research areas. Descriptive statistical analysis will be deployed to analyze the canter tendency of the respondents’ profile and items of the variable, whereas causal research will be established to study the cause-and-effect relationship between the factors of CLE and the perception and satisfaction of nursing students in CLE. The target population is nursing students currently practicing clinical work in hospitals of Northern Region Malaysia, and the sample size is determined based on the factor of effect size, power (1-β), level of significance (α), and the technique of the statistical analysis. Factor analysis and multivariate normality test will be conducted for justifying the validity and reliability of the data before proceeding to the correlation and multivariate regression testing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ludin, S.M., Arsyad, N.A.: The clinical learning environment of intensive care unit as perceived by International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) undergraduate nursing students. Int. J. Care Sch. 4(1), 29–35 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Malaysia, N.B.: Standards and Guidelines for Nursing Programmes. Ministry of Health, Malaysia, Putrajaya (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kamphinda, S., Chilemba, E.B.: Clinical supervision and support: perspectives of undergraduate nursing students on their clinical learning environment in Malawi. Curationis 42(1), 1–10 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Flott, E.A., Linden, L.: The clinical learning environment in nursing education: a concept analysis. J. Adv. Nurs. 72(3), 501–513 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. d’Souza, M.S., Karkada, S.N., Parahoo, K., Venkatesaperumal, R.: Perception of and satisfaction with the clinical learning environment among nursing students. Nurse Educ. Today 35(6), 833–840 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Saarikoski, M., Isoaho, H., Warne, T., Leino-Kilpi, H.: The nurse teacher in clinical practice: developing the new sub-dimension to the clinical learning environment and supervision (CLES) scale. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 45(8), 1233–1237 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dunn, S.V., PhD, P. B.: The development of a clinical learning environment scale. J. Adv. Nurs. 22(6), 1166–1173 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nordquist, J., Hall, J., Caverzagie, K., Snell, L., Chan, M.K., Thoma, B., Philibert, I.: The clinical learning environment. Med. Teach. 41(4), 366–372 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wong, W.K., Bressington, D.T.: Psychometric properties of the clinical learning environment, supervision and nurse teacher scale (CLES+ T) for undergraduate nursing students in Hong Kong. Nurse Educ. Pract. 52, 103007 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sellberg, M., Palmgren, P.J., Möller, R.: A cross-sectional study of clinical learning environments across four undergraduate programs using the undergraduate clinical education environment measure. BMC Med. Educ. 21(1), 1–13 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Papastavrou, E., Dimitriadou, M., Tsangari, H., Andreou, C.: Nursing students’ satisfaction of the clinical learning environment: a research study. BMC Nurs. 15(1), 1–10 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Saleh, U., O’Connor, T., Al-Subhi, H., Alkattan, R., Al-Harbi, S., Patton, D.: The impact of nurse managers’ leadership styles on ward staff. Br. J. Nurs. 27(4), 197–203 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Žvanut, B., Lovrić, R., Kolnik, T.Š, Šavle, M., Pucer, P.: A Slovenian version of the “clinical learning environment, supervision and nurse teacher scale (Cles+ T)” and its comparison with the Croatian version. Nurse Educ. Pract. 30, 27–34 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Saarikoski, M., Leino-Kilpi, H.: The clinical learning environment and supervision by staff nurses: developing the instrument. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 39(3), 259–267 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pitkänen, S., Kääriäinen, M., Oikarainen, A., Tuomikoski, A.M., Elo, S., Ruotsalainen, H., Mikkonen, K.: Healthcare students’ evaluation of the clinical learning environment and supervision–a cross-sectional study. Nurse Educ. Today 62, 143–149 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bretag, T., Harper, R., Burton, M., Ellis, C., Newton, P., van Haeringen, K., Rozenberg, P.: Contract cheating and assessment design: exploring the relationship. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 44(5), 676–691 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Arkan, B., Ordin, Y., Yılmaz, D.: Undergraduate nursing students’ experience related to their clinical learning environment and factors affecting to their clinical learning process. Nurse Educ. Pract. 29, 127–132 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Iyigun, E., Tastan, S., Ayhan, H., Pazar, B., Tekin, Y.E., Coskun, H., Saarikoski, M.: The clinical learning environment, supervision and the nurse teacher evaluation scale: Turkish version. Int. J. Nurs. Pract. 26(2), e127 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Karim, J., Abdul Majid, A.H.F., Mohd Rashdan, N.F., Awang Besar, M.N., Yaman, M.N.: Nursing Students’ Satisfaction Towards Clinical Learning Environment (CLE) in Universiti

    Google Scholar 

  20. Holt, S.L., Vivian, S.R., Brown, H.: Training and preparedness of clinical coaches for their role in training student veterinary nurses in the United Kingdom: an exploratory inquiry. J. Vet. Med. Educ. e20200100 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mukan, S.M.W., Kulai, D., Nor, R.H.C.M.: Nursing students’ perceived effective clinical teachers’ behaviors. Asian J. Univ. Educ. 16(4), 200–210 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hababeh, M.O., Lalithabai, D.S.: Nurse trainees’ perception of effective clinical instructor characteristics. Int. J. Nurs. Sci. 7(3), 285–290 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yascavage, C.L.: Qualitative Study of Adjunct Clinical Nursing Instructors and Their Preparedness for Teaching Critical Thinking. Doctoral dissertation, Capella University (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kwashie, A.A.: Experiences of Ghanaian Student Nurses in the Clinical Learning Environment: Implications for Nursing Education and Practice. Doctoral dissertation, University of Ghana (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Farahat, F.Z., El-Sayed El-Shabory, N.E.H.M., Osman Abdel Haleem, S.A.R.: Nursing students’ challenges regarding their expectations and satisfaction before and after attending delivery room. Port Said Sci. J. Nurs. 8(1), 1–21 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Norman, S.M., Avey, J., Larson, M., Hughes, L.: The development of trust in virtual leader–follower relationships. Qual. Res. Organ. Manage. Int. J. (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Maida, C., Xiong, D., Marcus, M., Zhou, L., Huang, Y., Lyu, Y., Liu, H.: Quantitative data collection approaches in subject-reported oral health research: a scoping review. BMC Oral Health 22(435) (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sahin, S., Mete, J.: A brief study on descriptive research: Its nature and application in social science. Int. J. Res. Anal. Human 1(1), 11–11 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cunningham, S.: Causal Inference. Yale University Press (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  30. IBM, C.: IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 27.0. IBM Corp, Armonk, NY (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Delice, A.: The sampling issues in quantitative research. Educ. Sci. Theor. Pract. 10(4), 2001–2018 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  32. In, J., Kang, H., Kim, J.H., Kim, T.K., Ahn, E.J., Lee, D.K., Lee, S., Park, J.H.: Tips for troublesome sample-size calculation. Korean J. Anesthesiol. 73(2), 114 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ko, M.J., Lim, C.Y.: General considerations for sample size estimation in animal study. Korean J. Anesthesiol. 74(1), 23–29 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., Buchner, A.: GPOWER: a general power analysis program. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 28, 1–11 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kang, H.: Sample size determination and power analysis using the G* Power software. J. Educ. Eval. Health Prof. 18 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Etikan, I., Musa, S.A., Alkassim, R.S.: Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. Am. J. Theor. Appl. Stat. 5(1), 1–4 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Chang, S.J., Witteloostuijn, A.V., Eden, L.: Common method variance in international business research. In: Research Methods in International Business, pp. 385–398. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Fuller, C., Simmering, M.J., Atinc, G., Atinc, Y., Babin, B.J.: Common methods variance detection in business research. J. Bus. Res. 69(8), 3192–3198 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Napitupulu, D., Kadar, J.A., Jati, R.K.: Validity testing of technology acceptance model based on factor analysis approach. Indonesian J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 5(3), 697–704 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Aslam, M.: A study on skewness and kurtosis estimators of wind speed distribution under indeterminacy. Theoret. Appl. Climatol. 143(3), 1227–1234 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Gaboardi, M., Rogers, R.: Local private hypothesis testing: Chi-square tests. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR, pp. 1626–1635 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Izonin, I., Tkachenko, R., Kryvinska, N., Tkachenko, P.: Multiple linear regression based on coefficients identification using non-iterative SGTM neural-like structure. In: International Work-Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, pp. 467–479. Springer, Cham (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. UOW KDU University College, Penang, Malaysia

    Joshua Loo Teck Khun

  2. Kek Lok Si Charitable Hospital, Penang, Malaysia

    Quah Hsi Ching

  3. Inti International College Penang, Penang, Malaysia

    Sheila Rose Darmaraj & Subarshini Ramakrishnan

  4. Swinburne University of Technology Sarawak, Sarawak, Malaysia

    Kevin Tee Liang Tan

Authors
  1. Joshua Loo Teck Khun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Quah Hsi Ching
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sheila Rose Darmaraj
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kevin Tee Liang Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Subarshini Ramakrishnan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sheila Rose Darmaraj .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Post-Graduate Studies, Hanoi University of Industry, Hanoi, Vietnam

    Thi Hong Nga Nguyen

  2. Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel, Chapel HIll, NC, USA

    Darrell Norman Burrell

  3. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, CMR Institute of Technology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

    Vijender Kumar Solanki

  4. Accounting and Auditing Faculty, Academy of Finance, Hanoi, Vietnam

    Ngoc Anh Mai

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Khun, J.L.T., Ching, Q.H., Darmaraj, S.R., Tan, K.T.L., Ramakrishnan, S. (2024). Factors Impact on Private Institution Nursing Students’ Perception and Satisfaction of the Clinical Learning Environment in Northern Region of Malaysia. In: Nguyen, T.H.N., Burrell, D.N., Solanki, V.K., Mai, N.A. (eds) Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Research in Management and Technovation. ICRMAT 2023. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8472-5_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation