Abstract
Previous studies on opportunistic earnings management using accrual and real manipulation related to benchmark-beating find mixed evidence, especially when investigating alternative mechanisms (i.e., accrual earnings management and real earnings management). One issue that has not been examined is the information uncertainty environment. We expect that greater information uncertainty would provide more ambiguity about earnings management for market participants. Therefore, if managers are opportunistic, they are more likely to choose the less costly earnings management mechanism, i.e., accrual manipulation. The overall results show that firms just meeting earnings benchmarks use more accrual earnings management but not real earnings management in the high information uncertainty environment. The results hold after controlling for endogeneity and other factors that may affect earnings management.
This paper has developed from my Ph.D. thesis from Kingston University.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Burgstahler, D., Dichev, I.: Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses. J. Account. Econ. 24(1), 99–126 (1997)
Cohen, D.A., Dey, A., Lys, T.Z.: Real and accrual-based earnings management in the pre-and post-Sarbanes-Oxley periods. Account. Rev. 83(3), 757–787 (2008)
Gilliam, T.A., Heflin, F., Paterson, J.S.: Evidence that the zero-earnings discontinuity has disappeared. J. Account. Econ. 60(1), 117–132 (2015)
Jiang, G., Lee, C.M., Zhang, Y.: Information uncertainty and expected returns. Rev. Acc. Stud. 10(2), 185–221 (2005)
Zhang, X.F.: Information uncertainty and stock returns. J. Financ. 61(1), 105–137 (2006)
Chen, S.S., Lin, W.C., Chang, S.C., Lin, C.Y.: Information uncertainty, earnings management, and long-run stock performance following initial public offerings. J. Bus. Financ. Acc. 40(9–10), 1126–1154 (2013)
Stein, L.C., Wang, C.C.: Economic uncertainty and earnings management. In: Harvard Business School Accounting and Management Unit Working Paper, pp. 16–103 (2016)
Haque, A., Fatima, H., Abid, A., Qamar, M.A.J.: Impact of firm-level uncertainty on earnings management and role of accounting conservatism. Q. Financ. Econ. 3(4), 772–794 (2019)
Dye, R.A.: Earnings management in an overlapping generations model. J. Account. Res. 195–235 (1988)
Trueman, B., Titman, S.: An explanation for accounting income smoothing. J. Account. Res. 127–139 (1988)
Roychowdhury, S.: Earnings management through real activities manipulation. J. Account. Econ. 42(3), 335–370 (2006)
Cohen, D.A., Zarowin, P.: Accrual-based and real earnings management activities around seasoned equity offerings. J. Account. Econ. 50(1), 2–19 (2010)
Lennox, C., Yu, Y.J.: Cooking the books using different ingredients: an examination of cash flow frauds (2019)
Zang, A.Y.: Evidence on the trade-off between real activities manipulation and accrual-based earnings management. Account. Rev. 87(2), 675–703 (2011)
Durtschi, C., Easton, P.: Earnings management? The shapes of the frequency distributions of earnings metrics are not evidence ipso facto. J. Account. Res. 43(4), 557–592 (2005)
Healy, P.M., Wahlen, J.M.: A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Account. Horiz. 13(4), 365–383 (1999)
Hunton, J.E., Libby, R., Mazza, C.L.: Financial reporting transparency and earnings management (retracted). Account. Rev. 81(1), 135–157 (2006)
Jung, W.-O., Kwon, Y.K.: Disclosure when the market is unsure of information endowment of managers. J. Account. Res. 146–53 (1988)
Indjejikian, R.J.: The impact of costly information interpretation on firm disclosure decisions. J. Account. Res. 29(2), 277–301 (1991)
Zang, A.Y.: Evidence on the trade-off between real activities manipulation and accrual-based earnings management. Account. Rev. 87(2), 675–703 (2012)
Ibrahim, S., Xu, L., Rogers, G.: Real and accrual-based earnings management and its legal consequences: evidence from seasoned equity offerings. Account. Res. J. 24(1), 50–78 (2011)
Bartov, E., Givoly, D., Hayn, C.: The rewards to meeting or beating earnings expectations. J. Account. Econ. 33(2), 173–204 (2002)
Rosenbaum, P.R., Rubin, D.B.: The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1), 41–55 (1983)
Francis, J.J., Johnston, M., Robertson, C., Glidewell, L., Entwistle, V., Eccles, M.P., et al.: What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychol. Health 25(10), 1229–1245 (2010)
Tucker, J.W.: Selection bias and econometric remedies in accounting and finance research. J. Account. Literat. Winter (2010)
Kasznik, R., McNichols, M.F.: Does meeting earnings expectations matter? Evidence from analyst forecast revisions and share prices. J. Account. Res. 40(3), 727–759 (2002)
Tkac, P.A.: A trading volume benchmark: theory and evidence. J. Financ. Q. Anal. 34(1), 89–114 (1999)
Lim, T.: Rationality and analysts’ forecast bias. J. Financ. 56(1), 369–385 (2001)
Stoll, H.R.: The pricing of security dealer services: an empirical study of NASDAQ stocks. J. Financ. 33(4), 1153–1172 (1978)
Chiang, R., Venkatesh, P.: Insider holdings and perceptions of information asymmetry: a note. J. Financ. 43(4), 1041–1048 (1988)
Jones, J.J.: Earnings management during import relief investigations. J. Account. Res. 29(2), 193–228 (1991)
Dechow, P.M., Sloan, R.G., Sweeney, A.P.: Detecting earnings management. Account Rev. 193–225 (1995)
Lev, B., Nissim, D.: The persistence of the accruals anomaly. Contemp. Account. Res. 23(1), 193–226 (2006)
Becker, C.L., DeFond, M.L., Jiambalvo, J., Subramanyam, K.: The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemp. Account. Res. 15(1), 1–24 (1998)
Francis, J.R., Maydew, E.L., Sparks, H.C.: The role of big 6 auditors in the credible reporting of accruals. Audit. J. Pract. Theor. 18(2), 17–34 (1999)
Dechow, P.M.: Accounting earnings and cash flows as measures of firm performance: the role of accounting accruals. J. Account. Econ. 18(1), 3–42 (1994)
Butler, M., Leone, A.J., Willenborg, M.: An empirical analysis of auditor reporting and its association with abnormal accruals. J. Account. Econ. 37(2), 139–165 (2004)
Lawrence, A., Minutti-Meza, M., Zhang, P.: Can Big 4 versus non-Big 4 differences in audit-quality proxies be attributed to client characteristics? Account. Rev. 86(1), 259–286 (2011)
Shipman, J.E., Swanquist, Q.T., Whited, R.L.: Propensity score matching in accounting research. Account. Rev. 92(1), 213–244 (2016)
White, H.: A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica: J. Economet. Soc. 817–38 (1980)
Kothari, S.P., Leone, A.J., Wasley, C.E.: Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. J. Account. Econ. 39(1), 163–197 (2005)
Dechow, P.M., Dichev, I.D.: The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. Account. Rev. 77(s–1), 35–59 (2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Nguyen, T.T.H., Ibrahim, S. (2024). The Choice Between Accrual and Real Manipulation Around Information Uncertainty. In: Nguyen, T.H.N., Burrell, D.N., Solanki, V.K., Mai, N.A. (eds) Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Research in Management and Technovation. ICRMAT 2023. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8472-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8472-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-8471-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-8472-5
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)