Skip to main content

The Choice Between Accrual and Real Manipulation Around Information Uncertainty

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Research in Management and Technovation (ICRMAT 2023)

Abstract

Previous studies on opportunistic earnings management using accrual and real manipulation related to benchmark-beating find mixed evidence, especially when investigating alternative mechanisms (i.e., accrual earnings management and real earnings management). One issue that has not been examined is the information uncertainty environment. We expect that greater information uncertainty would provide more ambiguity about earnings management for market participants. Therefore, if managers are opportunistic, they are more likely to choose the less costly earnings management mechanism, i.e., accrual manipulation. The overall results show that firms just meeting earnings benchmarks use more accrual earnings management but not real earnings management in the high information uncertainty environment. The results hold after controlling for endogeneity and other factors that may affect earnings management.

This paper has developed from my Ph.D. thesis from Kingston University.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Burgstahler, D., Dichev, I.: Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses. J. Account. Econ. 24(1), 99–126 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cohen, D.A., Dey, A., Lys, T.Z.: Real and accrual-based earnings management in the pre-and post-Sarbanes-Oxley periods. Account. Rev. 83(3), 757–787 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gilliam, T.A., Heflin, F., Paterson, J.S.: Evidence that the zero-earnings discontinuity has disappeared. J. Account. Econ. 60(1), 117–132 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jiang, G., Lee, C.M., Zhang, Y.: Information uncertainty and expected returns. Rev. Acc. Stud. 10(2), 185–221 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang, X.F.: Information uncertainty and stock returns. J. Financ. 61(1), 105–137 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, S.S., Lin, W.C., Chang, S.C., Lin, C.Y.: Information uncertainty, earnings management, and long-run stock performance following initial public offerings. J. Bus. Financ. Acc. 40(9–10), 1126–1154 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stein, L.C., Wang, C.C.: Economic uncertainty and earnings management. In: Harvard Business School Accounting and Management Unit Working Paper, pp. 16–103 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Haque, A., Fatima, H., Abid, A., Qamar, M.A.J.: Impact of firm-level uncertainty on earnings management and role of accounting conservatism. Q. Financ. Econ. 3(4), 772–794 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dye, R.A.: Earnings management in an overlapping generations model. J. Account. Res. 195–235 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Trueman, B., Titman, S.: An explanation for accounting income smoothing. J. Account. Res. 127–139 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Roychowdhury, S.: Earnings management through real activities manipulation. J. Account. Econ. 42(3), 335–370 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cohen, D.A., Zarowin, P.: Accrual-based and real earnings management activities around seasoned equity offerings. J. Account. Econ. 50(1), 2–19 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lennox, C., Yu, Y.J.: Cooking the books using different ingredients: an examination of cash flow frauds (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zang, A.Y.: Evidence on the trade-off between real activities manipulation and accrual-based earnings management. Account. Rev. 87(2), 675–703 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Durtschi, C., Easton, P.: Earnings management? The shapes of the frequency distributions of earnings metrics are not evidence ipso facto. J. Account. Res. 43(4), 557–592 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Healy, P.M., Wahlen, J.M.: A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Account. Horiz. 13(4), 365–383 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hunton, J.E., Libby, R., Mazza, C.L.: Financial reporting transparency and earnings management (retracted). Account. Rev. 81(1), 135–157 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jung, W.-O., Kwon, Y.K.: Disclosure when the market is unsure of information endowment of managers. J. Account. Res. 146–53 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Indjejikian, R.J.: The impact of costly information interpretation on firm disclosure decisions. J. Account. Res. 29(2), 277–301 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zang, A.Y.: Evidence on the trade-off between real activities manipulation and accrual-based earnings management. Account. Rev. 87(2), 675–703 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ibrahim, S., Xu, L., Rogers, G.: Real and accrual-based earnings management and its legal consequences: evidence from seasoned equity offerings. Account. Res. J. 24(1), 50–78 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bartov, E., Givoly, D., Hayn, C.: The rewards to meeting or beating earnings expectations. J. Account. Econ. 33(2), 173–204 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rosenbaum, P.R., Rubin, D.B.: The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1), 41–55 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Francis, J.J., Johnston, M., Robertson, C., Glidewell, L., Entwistle, V., Eccles, M.P., et al.: What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychol. Health 25(10), 1229–1245 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tucker, J.W.: Selection bias and econometric remedies in accounting and finance research. J. Account. Literat. Winter (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kasznik, R., McNichols, M.F.: Does meeting earnings expectations matter? Evidence from analyst forecast revisions and share prices. J. Account. Res. 40(3), 727–759 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tkac, P.A.: A trading volume benchmark: theory and evidence. J. Financ. Q. Anal. 34(1), 89–114 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lim, T.: Rationality and analysts’ forecast bias. J. Financ. 56(1), 369–385 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Stoll, H.R.: The pricing of security dealer services: an empirical study of NASDAQ stocks. J. Financ. 33(4), 1153–1172 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chiang, R., Venkatesh, P.: Insider holdings and perceptions of information asymmetry: a note. J. Financ. 43(4), 1041–1048 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Jones, J.J.: Earnings management during import relief investigations. J. Account. Res. 29(2), 193–228 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Dechow, P.M., Sloan, R.G., Sweeney, A.P.: Detecting earnings management. Account Rev. 193–225 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lev, B., Nissim, D.: The persistence of the accruals anomaly. Contemp. Account. Res. 23(1), 193–226 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Becker, C.L., DeFond, M.L., Jiambalvo, J., Subramanyam, K.: The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemp. Account. Res. 15(1), 1–24 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Francis, J.R., Maydew, E.L., Sparks, H.C.: The role of big 6 auditors in the credible reporting of accruals. Audit. J. Pract. Theor. 18(2), 17–34 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Dechow, P.M.: Accounting earnings and cash flows as measures of firm performance: the role of accounting accruals. J. Account. Econ. 18(1), 3–42 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Butler, M., Leone, A.J., Willenborg, M.: An empirical analysis of auditor reporting and its association with abnormal accruals. J. Account. Econ. 37(2), 139–165 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lawrence, A., Minutti-Meza, M., Zhang, P.: Can Big 4 versus non-Big 4 differences in audit-quality proxies be attributed to client characteristics? Account. Rev. 86(1), 259–286 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Shipman, J.E., Swanquist, Q.T., Whited, R.L.: Propensity score matching in accounting research. Account. Rev. 92(1), 213–244 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. White, H.: A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica: J. Economet. Soc. 817–38 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kothari, S.P., Leone, A.J., Wasley, C.E.: Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. J. Account. Econ. 39(1), 163–197 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Dechow, P.M., Dichev, I.D.: The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. Account. Rev. 77(s–1), 35–59 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thi Thu Ha Nguyen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nguyen, T.T.H., Ibrahim, S. (2024). The Choice Between Accrual and Real Manipulation Around Information Uncertainty. In: Nguyen, T.H.N., Burrell, D.N., Solanki, V.K., Mai, N.A. (eds) Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Research in Management and Technovation. ICRMAT 2023. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8472-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics