Skip to main content

Prediction of Breast Cancer Using Feature Extraction-Based Methods

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Soft Computing and Signal Processing ( ICSCSP 2023)

Abstract

A substantial amount of data is needed for efficient feature extraction and pattern recognition to guarantee the robustness of a machine-learning model in differentiating between numerous classes. It becomes essential to extract useful features from existing data or improve them using augmentation techniques to avoid the requirement for more real data. Machine learning (ML) models use artificial intelligence (AI) and ML to make life easier for patients and medical professionals while handling complicated problems in clinical imaging. A very accurate automated approach has been created to identify anomalies in bone X-ray pictures. Even with limited resources, image pre-processing techniques like noise removal and contrast enhancement are essential for enhancing image quality and obtaining high diagnostic accuracy. The Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) texture features, which reflect second-order statistical data about the grayscale values of adjacent pixels, are frequently used to classify images. Various tools and methodologies for organizing, evaluating, and constructing ML models have become crucial given the enormous rise in data available in the modern period. Data is the energy or oxygen of machine learning. ML algorithms must be developed and improved continuously to handle data-related difficulties. In other words, for algorithms to produce reliable and useful models, it is crucial to have a well-organized dataset with clear patterns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Seal A, Bhattacharjee D, Nasipuri M (2018) Predictive and probabilistic model for cancer detection using computer tomography images. Multimed Tools Appl 77(3):3991–4010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shanmuga K, Haralick RM (1973) Haralick Shanmugam Dinstein 1973

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wang D, Khosla A, Gargeya R, Irshad H, Beck AH (2016) Deep learning for identifying metastatic breast cancer. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.05718

  4. Mahendran SK, Baboo SS (2011) An enhanced tibia fracture detection tool using image processing and classification fusion techniques in X-Ray images. Glob J Comput Sci Technol 11(14):22–28

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bousson V, Bergot C, Sutter B, Levitz P, Cortet B (2012) Trabecular bone score (TBS): available knowledge, clinical relevance, and future prospects. Osteoporos Int 23(5):1489–1501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Litjens G et al (2018) 1399 H&E-stained sentinel lymph node sections of breast cancer patients: the camelyon dataset. GigaScience 7:giy065

    Google Scholar 

  7. Aresta G et al (2018) Bach: grand challenge on breast cancer histology images. arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.04277

  8. Shirvaikar M, Huang N, Dong XN (2016) The measurement of bone quality using gray level co-occurrence matrix textural features. J Med Imaging Heal Inform 6(6):1357–1362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bejnordi BE et al (2017) Diagnostic assessment of deep learning algorithms for detection of lymph node metastases in women with breast cancer. JAMA 318:2199–2210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bándi P et al (2018) From detection of individual metastases to classification of lymph node status at the patient level: the camelyon17 challenge. IEEE Trans Med Imaging

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vijayakumar R, Gireesh G (2013) Quantitative analysis and fracture detection of pelvic bone X-ray images. In: 2013 4th international conference on computing communication network technology. ICCCNT

    Google Scholar 

  12. Madhulika et al (2013) Implementing edge detection for medical diagnosis of a bone in Matlab. In: Proceedings of 5th international conference on computing intelligence communication networks. ICICN, pp 270–274

    Google Scholar 

  13. Al-Ayyoub M, Al-Zghool D (2013) Determining the type of long bone fractures in x-Ray images. WSEAS Trans Inf Sci Appl 10(8):261–270

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rajpurkar P et al (2017) MURA: large dataset for abnormality detection in musculoskeletal radiographs, Dec 2017

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suddamalla Tirupathi Reddy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Reddy, S.T., Bharti, J., Roy, B. (2024). Prediction of Breast Cancer Using Feature Extraction-Based Methods. In: Zen, H., Dasari, N.M., Latha, Y.M., Rao, S.S. (eds) Soft Computing and Signal Processing. ICSCSP 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 840. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8451-0_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics