Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Review and Design of Integrated Dashboard Model for Performance Measurements

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Soft Computing and Signal Processing ( ICSCSP 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 840))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 72 Accesses

Abstract

This article presents a new approach for performance measurement in organizations, integrating the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and objective matrix (OM) with the balanced scorecard (BSC) dashboard model. This comprehensive framework prioritizes strategic objectives, establishes performance measures, and provides visual representations of progress over time. A case study illustrates the method’s effectiveness, offering a holistic view of organizational performance. The article contributes significantly to performance measurement and management, providing a practical and comprehensive assessment framework. Additionally, the project focuses on creating an intuitive dashboard for Fursa Foods Ltd. Using IoT technology, it delivers real-time insights into environmental variables affecting rice processing. The dashboard allows data storage, graphical representations, and other visualizations using Python, enhancing production oversight for the company.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liew TS, Hui WS (2015) Integrated analytical hierarchy process and objective matrix in balanced scorecard dashboard model for performance measurements. J Intell Manuf 26(5):981–991. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-014-0934-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Harun NZ, Abas H, Abas NH (2015) A survey of software testing practices in Malaysia. J Softw Eng Appl 8(11):545–557. https://doi.org/10.4236/jsea.2015.811053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Babar MA, Brohi SN, Mendes E (2010) An empirical study on software testing practices and challenges in global software development. Inf Softw Technol 52(11):1191–1204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2010.07.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Xia X, Yue T, Briand L, Labiche Y (2014) Exploring the relationship between test case properties and defect detection effectiveness. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 40(3):267–281. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2013.22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gorla A, Gross F, Zeller A (2012) An empirical study of the effects of test suite reduction on fault localization. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 38(2):272–290. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2011.47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rodrigues MA, Vieira M, Maldonado JC (2019) A systematic literature review of software testing in the cloud. Inf Softw Technol 108:33–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2018.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shang C, Chen Y, Zhou Z (2017) Automated GUI testing using artificial intelligence. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 43(1):26–48. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2016.2614957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Khanna R, Gupta RK (2016) Testing concurrent software: a systematic literature review. ACM Comput Surv 49(3) (Article 53). https://doi.org/10.1145/2884781

  9. Goncalves MJ, Fernandes JP, Rocha HG (2018) Automated testing of Android applications: a systematic literature review. J Syst Softw 146:169–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2018.10.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hasan I, Javed MA (2019) Continuous testing in DevOps. In: 2019 IEEE 19th international conference on software quality, reliability and security companion (QRS-C)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lind JD, Musser JD (2017) Key considerations for effective dashboard design. J AHIMA 88(1):14–19 PMID: 28125795

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mayorga R, Duchowski AT (2019) Dashboard design: the effect of emotion and perception on user experience. Int J Human Comput Interact 35(17):1567–1580. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1597525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hemphill CL, Long BL (2016) Designing and implementing effective dashboards. J AHIMA 87(7):40–45 PMID: 27427633

    Google Scholar 

  14. Alshehri S, Al-Yahya M, Almutairi M, Al-Nuaim H, Almudimigh A (2020) Dashboard design: a comparative study of user perception and performance. Int J Hum Comput Interact 36(17):1613–1623. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1827647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Qin J, Zhou Z (2019) A survey of dashboard design guidelines. J Vis 22(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-018-0523-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Alshammari M, Alshammari T (2018) Agile testing: an overview. J King Saud Univ Comput Inf Sci 30(3):363–370

    Google Scholar 

  17. Duvvuri S, Gargeya VB (2020) The role of artificial intelligence in software testing: a review. In: Proceedings of the 2020 4th international conference on computing and artificial intelligence (pp 128–133)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science, CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, India

    J. Vijay Arputharaj

  2. Department of Computer Science, Skyline University Nigeria, Kano, Nigeria

    Mahmud El Yakub & A. Senthil Kumar

  3. Department of Computer Science, University of Hafr Al Batin, Hafr Al Batin, Saudi Arabia

    Ahmed Abba Haruna

Authors
  1. J. Vijay Arputharaj
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mahmud El Yakub
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ahmed Abba Haruna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. Senthil Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Vijay Arputharaj .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Science and Technology, International Institute of Advance Technology (ICATSUC), Sarawak, Malaysia

    Hushairi Zen

  2. Department of Computer Science, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia

    Naga M. Dasari

  3. Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Malla Reddy Engineering College for Women, Secunderabad, India

    Y. Madhavee Latha

  4. Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Malla Reddy College of Engineering and Technology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

    S. Srinivasa Rao

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Arputharaj, J.V., Yakub, M.E., Haruna, A.A., Senthil Kumar, A. (2024). Review and Design of Integrated Dashboard Model for Performance Measurements. In: Zen, H., Dasari, N.M., Latha, Y.M., Rao, S.S. (eds) Soft Computing and Signal Processing. ICSCSP 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 840. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8451-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation