Skip to main content

Design of a Generic Simulation Model of Direct and Reverse Logistics of PET Plastic Focused to Mitigation of Negative Impacts on Retailers

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of World Conference on Information Systems for Business Management (ISBM 2023)

Abstract

This article proposes a generic forward and reverse logistics simulation model that evaluates the performance of a post-consumer PET container collection strategy that consists of implementing a refundable deposit system, using simulation and different measurement indicators, to analyze the performance of the supply chain to define what would be the most favorable conditions for retailers in terms of profits. The study establishes control mechanisms and definition of public policies in the collection of PET containers, under simulated data in an exhaustive process of data collection in the municipality of Barranquilla in the department of Atlántico.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ripa J (2016) ¿Qué se degrada antes, un chicle o una colilla? El país – EspacioEco. Recuperado de: http://economia.elpais.com/economia/2016/08/02/actualidad/1470137688_788306.html.

  2. Avella O (2005) Empaques, envases y embalajes: una propuesta normative. Tecnogestión 11(1):41–50

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Lavee D (2010) A cost-benefit analysis of a deposit—refund program for beverage containers in Israel. Waste Manage 30:338–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dace E, Pakere I, Blumberga D (2013) Evaluation of economic aspects of the deposit-refund system for packaging in Latvia. Manage Environ Q Int J 24(3):311–329

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lu Z, Hasselström L, Finnveden G, Johansson N (2022) Cost-benefit analysis of two possible deposit-refund systems for reuse and recycling of plastic packaging in Sweden. Clean Waste Syst 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clwas.2022.100048

  6. Gerassimidou S, Lovat E, Ebner N, You W, Giakoumis T, Martin O, Iacovidou E (2022) Unpacking the complexity of the UK plastic packaging value chain: a stakeholder perspective. Sustain Prod Consumption 30:657–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jang Y, Kim K, Woo J (2023) Post-consumer plastic packaging waste from online food delivery services in South Korea. Waste Manage 156:177–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2022.11.036

  8. Castillo M, Avila Y, Parody A, Pacheco C, Cartagena E, Viloria A, Burgos W (2018) Public perception of dangerous household hazardous waste management: pilot study in Colombia. J Eng Appl Sci 13(2):282–285. https://doi.org/10.3923/jeasci.2018.282.2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wojanowski R, Verter V, Boyaci T (2007) Retail–collection network design under deposit—refund. Comput Oper Res 34:324–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Numata D (2009) Economic analysis of deposit—refund systems with measures for mitigating negative impacts on suppliers. Resour Conserv Recycl 53:199–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Coelho T, Castro R, Gobbo Jr (2011) PET containers in Brazil: opportunities and challenges of a logistics model for post-consumer waste recycling. Resour Conserv Recycl 55:291–299

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mohamad N, Jaber M, Searcy C (2014) A reverse logistics inventory model for plastic bottles. Int J Logistics Manage 25(2):315–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jayant A, Gupta P, Garg S (2014) Simulation modelling and analysis of network design for closed-loop supply chain: a case study of battery industry. Procedia Eng 97:2213–2221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Numata D (2010) On illegal activities in the California state beverage container deposit system. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 12:314–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rossi J, Bianchini A (2022) “Plastic waste free”—a new circular model for the management of plastic packaging in food value chain. Transp Res Procedia 67:153–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2022.12.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Martin E, Oliveira D, Oliveira L, Bezerra B (2021) Life cycle comparative assessment of pet bottle waste management options: a case study for the city of Bauru, Brazil. Waste Manage 119:226–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.08.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Obredor-Baldovino Thalía .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Thalía, OB., Gustavo, G., Gonzalo, Á. (2024). Design of a Generic Simulation Model of Direct and Reverse Logistics of PET Plastic Focused to Mitigation of Negative Impacts on Retailers. In: Iglesias, A., Shin, J., Patel, B., Joshi, A. (eds) Proceedings of World Conference on Information Systems for Business Management. ISBM 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 834. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8349-0_32

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics