Skip to main content

Effect of Instruction Intervention on MOOC Forum Discussion: Student Engagement and Interaction Characteristics

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Technology in Education. Innovative Practices for the New Normal (ICTE 2023)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1974))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 318 Accesses

Abstract

This study delves into the effect of instruction intervention on a MOOC forum discussion to ascertain its impact on students’ participation and the characteristics of their interactions. Using a mixed-method approach combining social network analysis (SNA) and inductive qualitative analysis, the relationships and underlying interactions within an EFL MOOC discussion were examined. The findings revealed that instruction intervention by teachers effectively augmented students’ engagement within the discussion area, fostering both instructor-learner and learner-learner interactions. Additionally, the conventional hub-and-spoke structure, where the instructor serves as the central node in the MOOC forum, was found to be subject to change through instruction intervention. Network analysis of the original post and a comparative assessment of two instances highlighted the direct reply tie definition as the most informative for revealing interaction relationships. It is recommended that teachers and teaching assistants actively and strategically participate in MOOC discussions to facilitate independent learning in the era of intelligent education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alonso, F., Lopez, G., Manrique, D., Vines, J.M.: An instructional model for web-based e-learning education with a blended learning process approach. Br. J. Edu. Technol. 36(2), 217–235 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, C., Thomasson, H., Caverly, D.: The pedagogical role of forums in MOOCs: a study of massive open online course discussion forums. Internet High. Educ. 48, 100777 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.H., Hong, J.C., Chiou, S.K.: Effects of flipped classroom and online discussion teaching strategies on college students’ learning outcomes, satisfaction, and engagement. Interact. Learn. Environ. 1–16 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z., Jiao, J., Hu, K.: Characteristics of learner interaction and network construction in MOOC forum discussion. In: ICOIE 2019, pp. N/A. Hong Kong (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z., Jiao, J., Hu, K.: Formative assessment as an online instruction intervention: student engagement, outcomes, and perceptions. Int. J. Distance Educ. Technol. (IJDET) 19(1), 50–65 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillani, N., Eynon, R.: Communication, collaboration and community: a critical analysis of the use of social media in higher education. In: Newman, E.M., Eidson, C.T., Henry, R.M. (Eds.) Communication Across the Life Span, pp. 177–194. Taylor & Francis (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G.M., Veletsianos, G., Seaman, J.: U.S. faculty and administrators’ experiences and approaches in the early weeks of the covid-19 pandemic. Online Learn. 24(2), 6–21 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, N.F.: Inside online learning: examining learner interactions in an asynchronous online discussion forum. Internet High. Educ. 44, 100718 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M., Smith, K.: Exploring the relationship between student motivation, engagement, and retention in a MOOC: a comparative, longitudinal study. Internet High Educ. 33, 60–70 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, I., Lee, J.: Effects of different types of interaction on learning achievement, satisfaction, and participation in web-based instruction. Innov. Educ. Teach. Int. 55(3), 338–346 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y., Choi, I., Kim, T.: Instructor immediacy in massive open online courses (MOOCs): an analysis of learner experiences and perceptions. Comput. Educ. 137, 36–47 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, J.: A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In: Christenson, S.L., Reschly, A.L., Wylie, C., (Eds.) Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, pp. 149–172. Springer (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M.S., Jones-Farmer, A., Williams, B.D., Maben, S.: The impact of prior knowledge on interactions in a MOOC discussion board. Comput. Educ. 141, 103605 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.L.: Interaction and learning. In: Seo, K.K. (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology (4th ed.), pp. 1731–1740. IGI Global (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, S., Zhang, X., Chen, Z., Qi, M., Xu, T.: Exploring factors influencing college students’ engagement in blended learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Distance Educ. 43(4), 540–563 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q., Woo, H.L., Quek, C.L., Yang, Y., Liu, M.: Using the ARCS model to examine MOOC learner dropout and retention: perspectives of learners and instructors. Educ. Tech. Res. Dev. 68(5), 2201–2222 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y.: A framework for assessing the quality of MOOCs. In: Handbook of Research on Cross-Cultural Online Learning in Higher Education, pp. 120–135. IGI Global (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, A.F., Cui, Y., Hausknecht, S.: Learning analytics for online discussions: design approaches and tools to reveal patterns of student engagement. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 20(3), 180–192 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, A.F., Cui, Y.: Discourse-centric learning analytics. In: Huang, R., DĂ­az-Morales, K.J., Ruiz-Shulcloper, J.A. (Eds.) Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning – IDEAL 2018, pp. 168–176. Springer (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, A.F., Cui, Y.: Examining the potential of learning analytics in computer-supported collaborative learning. Int. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn. 13(1), 7–34 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, T.Y.: Systematic analysis of online discussion patterns and participant roles in a massive open online course using social network analysis. Interact. Learn. Environ. 29(4), 489–506 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to express sincere gratitude to the anonymous reviewers and Professor Chen Zexuan from Southern Medical University for their invaluable feedback on earlier versions of this paper. This paper is funded by the Education Science Planning Project in Guangdong Province in 2022 (Higher Education Project) (Grant No. 2022GXJK219).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenyi Chen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chen, W. (2024). Effect of Instruction Intervention on MOOC Forum Discussion: Student Engagement and Interaction Characteristics. In: Cheung, S.K.S., Wang, F.L., Paoprasert, N., Charnsethikul, P., Li, K.C., Phusavat, K. (eds) Technology in Education. Innovative Practices for the New Normal. ICTE 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1974. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8255-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8255-4_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-8254-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-8255-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics