Skip to main content

Assessing Economic, Social and Environmental Implications of Implementing Sustainability in the Built Environment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Towards a Carbon Neutral Future (ICSBS 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 393))

  • 174 Accesses

Abstract

The building and construction sector has been acknowledged as a main contributor to the global carbon emission. In addition to environmental implications, the built environment also has implications in the social and economic development. However, the social and economic implications are often sidelined in the past studies. It therefore calls for a need to investigate the implications of sustainability within the context of built environments. The objective of the paper is to determine the extent to which the three pillars of sustainability are adopted in the built environment and explore their environmental, social and economic implications in a holistic manner. A questionnaire was used to solicit information from a range of construction stakeholders to capture different stakeholder viewpoints on the implications of sustainability. The results showed that more than 80% of respondents considered they have implemented the three pillars of sustainability in their practice. The environmental pillar has the highest level of implementation followed by the social and economic pillars. This result reinforced literature by showing that the environmental sustainability is still predominant in sustainability practice, with an emphasis on energy efficiency and renewable or recyclable resources. Surprisingly, the social implications are greatly acknowledged where a sustainable built environment is perceived to creating a healthier environment and increasing user comfort and satisfactions. Construction stakeholders are however less convinced by the positive economic implications due to an absence of strong evidence of reduced life cycle cost associated with sustainable built environments. This paper provides an empirical insight into the implications of implementing sustainability in the built environment and offers an indication of a transition from the existing environmental-oriented system to a more socio-environmental context in the pursuit of sustainability. Future studies shall integrate more socio-environmental aspects in assessing sustainable built environments to reveal the complex relationships of the three pillars in the pursuit of sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beheiry SM, Chong WK, Haas CT (2006) Examining the business impact of owner commitment to sustainability. J Constr Eng Manag 132(4):384–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chwieduk D (2003) Towards sustainable-energy buildings. Appl Energy 76(1–3):211–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dadhich P, Genovese A, Kumar N, Acquaye A (2015) Developing sustainable supply chains in the UK construction industry: a case study. Int J Prod Econ 164:271–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwaikat LN, Ali KN (2018) The economic benefits of a green building–evidence from Malaysia. J Build Eng 18:448–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein MJ (2018) Making sustainability work: best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental and economic impacts. Routledge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler KM, Rauch EM, Henderson JW, Kora AR (2010) Re-assessing green building performance: a post occupancy evaluation of 22 GSA buildings (No. PNNL-19369). Pacific Northwest National Lab: Richland, WA (United States)

    Google Scholar 

  • GABC (2016) Global status report 2016: towards zero-emission efficient and resilient buildings

    Google Scholar 

  • Gan X, Zuo J, Ye K, Skitmore M, Xiong B (2015) Why sustainable construction? Why not? An owner’s perspective. Habitat Int 47:61–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goh CS (2017) Towards an integrated approach for assessing triple bottom line in the built environment. Paper presented at SB-LAB 2017—International conference on advances on sustainable cities and buildings development, Portugal

    Google Scholar 

  • Goh CS, Rowlinson S (2015) Dimensions of sustainable construction: the perspectives of construction stakeholders. In: Proceedings of the 4th world construction symposium, Colombo, Sri Lanka, 12–14 June 2015, pp 224–230

    Google Scholar 

  • GSA Public Building Service (2008) Assessing green building performance: a post occupancy evaluation of 12 GSA buildings. Retrieved 22 April 2018, from https://www.usgbc.org/Docs/Archive/General/Docs4308.pdf

  • Hansmann R, Mieg HA, Frischknecht P (2012) Principal sustainability components: empirical analysis of synergies between the three pillars of sustainability. Int J Sust Dev World 19(5):451–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee YS, Guerin DA (2010) Indoor environmental quality differences between office types in LEED-certified buildings in the US. Build Environ 45(5):1104–1112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Wang Z, Lin B, Hong J, Zhu Y (2018) Occupant satisfaction in Three-Star-certified office buildings based on comparative study using LEED and BREEAM. Build Environ 132:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mistry V (2007) Briefing: BREEAM—making what is important measurable. Proc Inst Civ Eng—Eng Sustain 160(1):11–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Newsham GR, Mancini S, Birt BJ (2009) Do LEED-certified buildings save energy? Yes, but…. Energy Build 41(8):897–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ries R, Bilec MM, Gokhan NM, Needy KL (2006) The economic benefits of green buildings: a comprehensive case study. Eng Econ 51(3):259–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scofield JH (2009) Do LEED-certified buildings save energy? Not really…. Energy Build 41(12):1386–1390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takim R, Akintoye A, Kelly J (2004) Analysis of measures of construction project success in Malaysia. In: Khosrowshahi F (ed) 20th Annual ARCOM conference, 1–3 Sept 2004, Heriot Watt University. Association of Researchers in Construction Management, vol 2, pp 1123–1133

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan Y, Shen L, Yao H (2011) Sustainable construction practice and contractors’ competitiveness: a preliminary study. Habitat Int 35(2):225–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher A, Milner K (2016) Is a green building really better for building occupants? A longitudinal evaluation. Build Environ 108:194–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US EEEE (n.d.) The social benefits of sustainable design. Retrieved 9 Nov 2018, from https://www1.eere.energy.gov/femp/pdfs/buscase_section3.pdf

  • Zainul Abidin N (2010) Investigating the awareness and application of sustainable construction concept by Malaysian developers. Habitat Int 34(4):421–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The paper is supported by Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (project no. FRGS/1/2016/SSI11/ HWUM/02/1), provided by the Ministry of Education Malaysia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Goh, C.S., Chin, S.Y.M. (2024). Assessing Economic, Social and Environmental Implications of Implementing Sustainability in the Built Environment. In: Papadikis, K., Zhang, C., Tang, S., Liu, E., Di Sarno, L. (eds) Towards a Carbon Neutral Future. ICSBS 2023. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 393. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7965-3_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7965-3_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-7964-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-7965-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics