Skip to main content

An Innovative Model for Teacher Presence or Not in Video for Online Instruction Based on Neural Theory

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence in Education Technologies: New Development and Innovative Practices (AIET 2023)

Abstract

Online learning has become an essential part of all levels of education today. However, whether an instructor should appear or not during online teaching is a dispute. Some empirical studies show that instructor presence enhances learning outcomes and engagement of students, while others reveal that instructor presence or not does not affect learning outcomes. Some studies support the presence of the instructor because the presence of the instructor provides social cues to the learners. On the contrary, others are against instructor presence because instructor presence distracts students from learning content. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify when teachers should or should not appear in videos during online teaching. This article explores the effectiveness of instructor presence in video based on multimedia learning theory. To simplify the problem, we adopt two media channels: audio and video. For a single channel alone, an additional coherent channel will enhance online learning, while a disjointed channel will hinder learning. However, additional sources from the same channel can hinder learning. Time is also a critical factor do decide on the presence of an instructor. If a screen does not appear for enough time, students cannot finish reading and may feel stressed. On the other hand, if the same screen stays on for a long time, students can feel bored. Therefore, the media channels, the media sources, and their duration decide whether an instructor should appear in a video for online learning. This concise principle can explain the dispute about the presence of an instructor during online learning. In addition, it can guide instructors on when they should present in online learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Martin, F., Wang, C., Sadaf, A.: Student perception of helpfulness of facilitation strategies that enhance instructor presence, connectedness, engagement and learning in online courses. Internet High. Educ. 37, 52–65 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang, J., Antonenko, P.D.: Instructor presence in instructional video: effects on visual attention, recall, and perceived learning. Comput. Hum. Behav. 71, 79–89 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wilson, K.E., Martinez, M., Mills, C., D’Mello, S., Smilek, D., Risko, E.F.: Instructor presence effect: liking does not always lead to learning. Comput. Educ. 122, 205–220 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ndibalema, P.: Constraints of transition to online distance learning in higher education institutions during COVID-19 in developing countries: a systematic review. E-Lear. Digit. Media 19(6), 595–618 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Singh, M., Adebayo, S.O., Saini, M., Singh, J.: Indian government E-learning initiatives in response to COVID-19 crisis: a case study on online learning in Indian higher education system. Educ. Inf. Technol. 26(6), 7569–7607 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Flores, M.A., et al.: Portuguese higher education students’ adaptation to online teaching and learning in times of the COVID-19 pandemic: personal and contextual factors. High. Educ. Int. J. High. Educ. Res. 83(6), 1389–1408 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jiang, H., Islam, A.Y.M.A., Gu, X., Spector, J.M.: Online learning satisfaction in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: a regional comparison between eastern and western Chinese Universities. Educ. Inf. Technol. 26(6), 6747–6769 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Singh, V., Thurman, A.: How many ways can we define online learning? A systematic literature review of definitions of online learning (1988–2018). Am. J. Distance Educ. 33(4), 289–306 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mayer, R.E.: Using multimedia for e-learning. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 33(5), 403–423 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Makransky, G., Mayer, R.E.: Benefits of taking a virtual field trip in immersive virtual reality: evidence for the immersion principle in multimedia learning. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 34(3), 1771–1798 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Anmarkrud, Ø., Andresen, A., Bråten, I.: Cognitive load and working memory in multimedia learning: conceptual and measurement issues. Educ. Psychol. 54(2), 61–83 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Berssanette, J.H., de Francisco, A.C.: Cognitive load theory in the context of teaching and learning computer programming: a systematic literature review. IEEE Trans. Educ. 65(3), 440–449 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Paivio, A.: Dual coding theory, word abstractness, and emotion: a critical review of Kousta et al. (2011). J. Exp. Psychol. 142(1), 282–287 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Paivio, A.: Dual coding theory: retrospect and current status. Can. J. Psychol./Revue canadienne de psychologie 45(3), 255 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Paivio, A.: Intelligence, dual coding theory, and the brain. Intelligence 47, 141–158 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McClelland, M.M., Acock, A.C., Piccinin, A., Rhea, S.A., Stallings, M.C.: Relations between preschool attention span-persistence and age 25 educational outcomes. Early Child. Res. Q. 28(2), 314–324 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Subramanian, K.R.: Myth and mystery of shrinking attention span. Int. J. Trend Res. Dev. 5(3), 1–6 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bester, G., Brand, L.: The effect of technology on learner attention and achievement in the classroom. South Afr. J. Educ. 33(2), 1–15 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bradbury, N.A.: Attention span during lectures: 8 seconds, 10 minutes, or more? Adv. Physiol. Educ. 40(4), 509–513 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00109.2016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Geri, N., Winer, A., Zaks, B.: Challenging the six-minute myth of online video lectures: can interactivity expand the attention span of learners? Online J. Appl. Knowl. Manage. (OJAKM) 5(1), 101–111 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jain, A.K., Mao, J., Mohiuddin, K.M.: Artificial neural networks: a tutorial. Computer 29(3), 31–44 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ng, Y.Y., Przybylek, A.: Instructor presence in video lectures: preliminary findings from an online experiment. IEEE Access 9, 36485–36499 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Yongbin Zhang thanks Beijing Municipal Education Commission (Grant No. 2021149), Beijing Higher Education Academy (MS2022398), and Beijing Institute of Graphic Communication (Grant No. 20231001) for supporting this research. Xiuli Fu appreciates the help from teachers and students participating in the survey.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiuli Fu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhang, Y., Fu, X., Wei, L., Zheng, Y. (2023). An Innovative Model for Teacher Presence or Not in Video for Online Instruction Based on Neural Theory. In: Schlippe, T., Cheng, E.C.K., Wang, T. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education Technologies: New Development and Innovative Practices. AIET 2023. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol 190. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7947-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7947-9_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-7946-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-7947-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics