Skip to main content

Noninvasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Down Syndrome Screening
  • 122 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) as a screening method for Down syndrome and other genetic abnormalities. Serum screening and invasive testing have limitations in terms of accuracy and risk of fetal loss, respectively. NIPT utilizes fetal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) obtained from maternal blood samples to analyze the fetal genetic material.

This chapter discusses the origin of cell-free DNA and the underlying principles of NIPT. It then provides practical guidelines for counseling, sample collection, and interpretation of normal and abnormal results. Finally, it explains the advantages and limitations of NIPT compared to traditional screening approaches, as well as the implications for clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Herzenberg LA, Bianchi DW, Schröder J, Cann HM, Iverson GM. Fetal cells in the blood of pregnant women: detection and enrichment by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979;76(3):1453–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Grabuschnig S, Bronkhorst AJ, Holdenrieder S, Rosales Rodriguez I, Schliep KP, Schwendenwein D, Ungerer V, Sensen CW. Putative origins of cell-free DNA in humans: a review of active and passive nucleic acid release mechanisms. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(21):8062.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Lo YM, Chan KC, Sun H, Chen EZ, Jiang P, Lun FM, Zheng YW, Leung TY, Lau TK, Cantor CR, Chiu RW. Maternal plasma DNA sequencing reveals the genome-wide genetic and mutational profile of the fetus. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2(61):61ra91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hochstenbach R, Nikkels PG, Elferink MG, Oudijk MA, van Oppen C, van Zon P, van Harssel J, Schuring-Blom H, Page-Christiaens GC. Cell-free fetal DNA in the maternal circulation originates from the cytotrophoblast: proof from an unique case. Clin Case Rep. 2015;3:489–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Ashoor G, Syngelaki A, Poon LC, Rezende JC, Nicolaides KH. Fetal fraction in maternal plasma cell-free DNA at 11–13 weeks’ gestation: relation to maternal and fetal characteristics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41(1):26–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dar P, Shani H, Evans MI. Cell-free DNA: comparison of technologies. Clin Lab Med. 2016;36(2):199–211.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Straver R, Oudejans CB, Sistermans EA, Reinders MJ. Calculating the fetal fraction for noninvasive prenatal testing based on genome-wide nucleosome profiles. Prenat Diagn. 2016;36(7):614–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Benn P, Cuckle H, Pergament E. Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy: current status and future prospects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;42(1):15–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Grace MR, Hardisty E, Dotters-Katz SK, Vora NL, Kuller JA. Cell-free DNA screening: complexities and challenges of clinical implementation. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2016;71(8):477–87.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Gil MM, Quezada MS, Revello R, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH. Analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal blood in screening for fetal aneuploidies: updated meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45(3):249–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rose NC, Barrie ES, Malinowski J, Jenkins GP, McClain MR, LaGrave D, Leung ML, ACMG Professional Practice and Guidelines Committee. Electronic address: documents@acmg.net. Systematic evidence-based review: the application of noninvasive prenatal screening using cell-free DNA in general-risk pregnancies. Genet Med. 2022;24(7):1379–91.

  12. Hu H, Wang L, Wu J, Zhou P, Fu J, Sun J, Cai W, Liu H, Yang Y. Noninvasive prenatal testing for chromosome aneuploidies and subchromosomal microdeletions/microduplications in a cohort of 8141 single pregnancies. Hum Genomics. 2019;13(1):14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Petersen AK, Cheung SW, Smith JL, Bi W, Ward PA, Peacock S, Braxton A, Van Den Veyver IB, Breman AM. Positive predictive value estimates for cell-free noninvasive prenatal screening from data of a large referral genetic diagnostic laboratory. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(6):691.e1–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen Y, Yu Q, Mao X, Lei W, He M, Lu W. Noninvasive prenatal testing for chromosome aneuploidies and subchromosomal microdeletions/microduplications in a cohort of 42,910 single pregnancies with different clinical features. Hum Genomics. 2019;13(1):60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Eggenhuizen GM, Go A, Koster MPH, Baart EB, Galjaard RJ. Confined placental mosaicism and the association with pregnancy outcome and fetal growth: a review of the literature. Hum Reprod Update. 2021;27(5):885–903.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Judah H, Gil MM, Syngelaki A, Galeva S, Jani J, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH. Cell-free DNA testing of maternal blood in screening for trisomies in twin pregnancy: updated cohort study at 10–14 weeks and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021;58(2):178–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee TJ, Rolnik DL, Menezes MA, McLennan AC, da Silva CF. Cell-free fetal DNA testing in singleton IVF conceptions. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(4):572–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Beulen L, Faas BHW, Feenstra I, van Vugt JMG, Bekker MN. Clinical utility of non-invasive prenatal testing in pregnancies with ultrasound anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;49(6):721–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Sim WS, Yeo SH, Choi C, Yeo TW, Lee JJ, Huynh VA, Finkelstein EA, Ozdemir S. Preferences for a non-invasive prenatal test as first-line screening for Down Syndrome: a discrete choice experiment. Prenat Diagn. 2022;42(11):1368–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dungan JS, Klugman S, Darilek S, Malinowski J, Akkari YMN, Monaghan KG, Erwin A, Best RG; ACMG Board of Directors. Electronic address: documents@acmg.net. Noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) for fetal chromosome abnormalities in a general-risk population: an evidence-based clinical guideline of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet Med. 2023;25(2):100336.

  21. International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bilardo CM, Chaoui R, Hyett JA, Kagan KO, Karim JN, Papageorghiou AT, Poon LC, Salomon LJ, Syngelaki A, Nicolaides KH. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): performance of 11–14-week ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023;61(1):127–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bowden B, de Souza S, Puchades A, Williams K, Morgan S, Anderson S, Tucker D, Hillier S. Implementation of non-invasive prenatal testing within a national UK antenatal screening programme: impact on women’s choices. Prenat Diagn. 2022;42(5):549–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim K. Advantages of the single nucleotide polymorphism-based noninvasive prenatal test. J Gene Med. 2015;12:66–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nicolaides KH, Syngelaki A, Gil M, Atanasova V, Markova D. Validation of targeted sequencing of single-nucleotide polymorphisms for non-invasive prenatal detection of aneuploidy of chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y. Prenat Diagn. 2013;33(6):575–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dar P, Curnow KJ, Gross SJ, Hall MP, Stosic M, Demko Z, Zimmermann B, Hill M, Sigurjonsson S, Ryan A, Banjevic M, Kolacki PL, Koch SW, Strom CM, Rabinowitz M, Benn P. Clinical experience and follow-up with large scale single-nucleotide polymorphism-based noninvasive prenatal aneuploidy testing. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211(5):527.e1–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Akbariqomi M, Heidari R, Gargari SS, Omrani MD, Rigi G, Sanikhani NS, Kooshki H, Mahmoudian F, Mazlomi MA, Tavoosidana G. Evaluation and statistical optimization of a method for methylated cell-free fetal DNA extraction from maternal plasma. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36(5):1029–38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Belova V, Plakhina D, Evfratov S, Tsukanov K, Khvorykh G, Rakitko A, Konoplyannikov A, Ilinsky V, Rebrikov D, Korostin D. NIPT technique based on the use of long chimeric DNA reads. Genes (Basel). 2020;11(6):590.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mohan P, Lemoine J, Trotter C, Rakova I, Billings P, Peacock S, Kao CY, Wang Y, Xia F, Eng CM, Benn P. Clinical experience with non-invasive prenatal screening for single-gene disorders. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022;59(1):33–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Hatt L, Brinch M, Singh R, Møller K, Lauridsen RH, Schlütter JM, Uldbjerg N, Christensen B, Kølvraa S. A new marker set that identifies fetal cells in maternal circulation with high specificity. Prenat Diagn. 2014;34(11):1066–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kadam L, Jain C, Kohan-Ghadr HR, Krawetz SA, Drewlo S, Armant DR. Endocervical trophoblast for interrogating the fetal genome and assessing pregnancy health at five weeks. Eur J Med Genet. 2019;62(8):103690.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kamat, A. (2023). Noninvasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT). In: Down Syndrome Screening. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7758-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7758-1_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-7757-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-7758-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics