Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Addressing Psychological Needs in Designing for a Sustainable Circular Economy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Design for a Sustainable Circular Economy

Part of the book series: Design Science and Innovation ((DSI))

  • 172 Accesses

Abstract

Approaches and methods on designing for a sustainable circular economy are developing solutions for sustainable development. For such solutions to succeed, market and social acceptance of circular products and services must improve. Currently, there is a mixed reception among consumers and hence a stagnating market share of circular solutions. In this chapter, the authors discuss these limitations and relate them to psychological aspects of consumer and user experience and behavior. Research on user experience and experience design has delivered theories, approaches and methods on how to design for people as they experience and behave in the world. One core finding is that psychological needs play an important role in human-product interaction. The fulfillment of such needs results in positive experiences, and can raise acceptance of products and services. We illustrate how psychological needs can be addressed in a sustainable circular design. They present a fictitious case to illustrate how specific non-instrumental qualities of offerings can address psychological needs and hence fundamentally influence overall judgments and behavior in interaction with sustainable circular solutions. Finally, we discuss how such needs-based experience design can be implemented in design processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adam MB, Minyenya-Njuguna J, Karuri Kamiru W, Mbugua S, Makobu NW, Donelson AJ (2020) Implementation research and human-centred design: how theory driven human-centred design can sustain trust in complex health systems, support measurement and drive sustained community health volunteer engagement. Health Policy Plan 35(2), ii150–ii162. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaa129

  • Anke J, Wölfel C, Schmitt F, Petzold C (2022) INSPIRe – Entwicklung eines Gamification-Ansatzes zur Attraktivitätssteigerung der Infrastruktur durch spielerische Maßnahmen im Straßenverkehr. Project report, https://doi.org/10.25368/2022.67

  • Bayazit N (2004) Investigating design: a review of forty years of design research. Des Issues 20(1):16–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bevan N, Carter J, Harker S (2015) ISO 9241-11 revised: What have we learnt about usability since 1998? Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 9169:143–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20901-2_13

  • Blijlevens J, Carbon C-C, Mugge R, Schoormans JPL (2012) Aesthetic appraisal of product designs: Independent effects of typicality and arousal. Br J Psychol 103:44–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02038.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blüher T, Riedelsheimer T, Gogineni S, Klemichen A, Stark R (2020) Systematic literature review—effects of pss on sustainability based on use case assessments. Sustainability 12 (17):S.6989. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176989

  • Boehm M, Thomas O (2013) Looking beyond the rim of one’s teacup: a multidisciplinary literature review of product-service systems in information systems, business management, and engineering & design. J Clean Prod 51:245–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bobbe T, Krzywinski J, Wölfel C (2016) A comparison of design process models from academic theory and professional practice. In: DS 84: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2016 14th international design conference. pp 1205–1214

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown T (2008) Design thinking design thinking. harvardbuisness review, 10. Academico/Material Didatico/Bibliografia 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhl A, Schmidt-Keilich M, Muster V, Blazejewski S, Schrader U, Harrach C, Süßbauer E (2019) Design thinking for sustainability: why and how design thinking can foster sustainability-oriented innovation development. J Clean Prod 231:1248–1257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burmester M (2013) Valenzmethode – formative evaluation der user experience. In Scherfer K, Volpers H (eds) Methoden der Webwissenschaft – Ein Handbuch. Bd. I Anwendungsbezogene Methoden, Vol 11, pp 141–160. LIT Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Burmester M, Laib M (2019) Warumfällt das Positive so schwer? Beschreibung von Herausforderungen bei der Gestaltung einer positiven User Experience. Mensch und Computer 2019 – Workshopband, pp 269–273. https://doi.org/10.18420/muc2019-ws-287-01

  • Burmester M, Laib M, Zeiner KM (2017) Positive Erlebnisse und Wohlbefinden in Arbeitskontexten durch Gestaltung der Mensch-Computer-Interaktion. In: Brohm-Badry M, Peifer C, Greve JM (eds) Positiv-Psychologische Forschung im deutschsprachigen Raum – State of the Art. Pabst

    Google Scholar 

  • Burmester M, Mast M, Jäger K, Homans H (2010) Valence method for formative evaluation of user experience. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on designing interactive systems - DIS, vol 10, pp 364–367. https://doi.org/10.1145/1858171.1858239

  • Camacho-Otero J, Boks C, Pettersen IN (2018) Consumption in the circular economy: a literature review. Sustainability 10:2758. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvo RA, Peters D (2014) Positive Computing – Technology for Wellbeing and Human Potential. MIT Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carrington MJ, Neville BA, Whitwell GJ (2014) Lost in translation: exploring the ethical consumer intention–behavior gap. J Bus Res 67:2759–2767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattaneo L, Cassina J, Petrucciani M, Terzi S, Wellsandt S (2019) Models, methods and tools for product service design. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95849-1

  • Charter M (ed.) (2018) Designing for the circular economy, 1st edn. Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Chou J-R (2021) A TRIZ-based product-service design approach for developing innovative products. Comput Ind Eng 161:107608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vere I, Melles G, Kapoor A (2010) Product design engineering–a global education trend in multidisciplinary training for creative product design. Eur J Eng Educ 35(1):33–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Wit M (2022) The circularity gap report 2022. Circ Econ. https://circularity-gap.world/2022#Download-the-report

  • Deci EL, Ryan RM (2000) The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inq: Int J Adv Psychol Theory 11(4):227–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desing H (2021) Product and service design for a sustainable circular economy. Doctoral dissertation, ETH Zurich.https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000472519

  • Desmet PMA (2012) Faces of product pleasure: 25 positive emotions in human-product interactions. Int J Des 6(2):1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmet PMA, Fokkinga SF (2020a) Beyond Maslow’s Pyramid: Introducing a typology of thirteen fundamental needs for human-centered design. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 4(3):1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti4030038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desmet PMA, Fokkinga SF (2020b) Thirteen fundamental psychological needs. Delft University of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmet PMA, Hassenzahl M (2012) Towards happiness: possibility-driven design. In: Zacarias JV, Oliveira M (ed) Human-computer interaction: the agency perspective. Springer, pp 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25691-2

  • Desmet PMA, Pohlmeyer AE (2013) Positive design: an introduction to design for subjective well-being. Int J Des 7(3):5–19. http://www.ijdesign.org/ojs/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/1666/595

  • Diefenbach S, Hassenzahl M (2017) Psychologie in der nutzerzentrierten Produktgestaltung. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne A, Raby F (2013) Speculative everything: design, fiction, and social dreaming. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellen MacArthur Foundation: how tool sharing could become a public utility: Toronto Tool Library and Makerspace. Circular Example. https://ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/circular-examples/how-tool-sharing-could-become-a-public-utility

  • Font X, English R, Gkritzali A (2018) Mainstreaming sustainable tourism with user-centred design. J Sustain Tour 26(10):1651–1667. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2018.1491981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson BL (2001) The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: the broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Am Psychol 56(3):218–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels FW (2011) The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: responses to seven criticisms. Environ Innov Soc Trans 1(1):24–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goedkoop MJ, van Halen CJG, te Riele HRM, Rommens PJM (1999) Product service systems, ecological and economic basics. Report for Dutch Ministries of Environment (VROM) and Economic Affairs (EZ)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassenzahl M (n. d.) Needs Cards. Experience Design Tools. http://www.experienceandinteraction.com/tools/

  • Hassenzahl M (2004) The interplay of beauty, goodness, and usability in interactive products. Hum-Comput Interact 19(4):319–349. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci1904_2

  • Hassenzahl M (2010) Experience design: technology for all the right reasons. Morgan & Claypool. https://doi.org/.2200/S00261ED1V01Y201003HCI008

  • Hassenzahl M (2008) User experience (UX): towards an experiential perspective on product quality. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference of the Association Francophone d’Interaction Homme-Machine, pp 11–15. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1512717

  • Haspel C, Burmester M (2021) Knowledge and implementation of usability and user experience in small and medium-sized enterprises. In Pfleging B, Kern D (eds) Mensch und Computer 2021. ACM, pp 131–135. https://doi.org/10.1145/3473856.3474299

  • Hassenzahl M, Burmester M, Koller F (2003) AttrakDlff : Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität 1 Einleitung Grundannahmen und Vorarbeiten. In: Szwillus J, Ziegler G (ed) Mensch & Computer 2003: Interaktion in Bewegung. B. G Teubner, pp 187–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassenzahl M, Diefenbach S, Göritz A (2010) Needs, affect, and interactive products – Facets of user experience. Interact Comput 22(5):353–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2010.04.002

  • Hassenzahl M, Burmester M, Koller F (2021) User experience is all there is - twenty years of designing positive experiences and meaningful technology. J Interactive Media I-Com 20(3):197–213. https://doi.org/10.1515/icom-2021-0034

  • Hassenzahl M, Eckoldt K, Diefenbach S, Laschke M, Lenz E, Kim J (2013) Designing moments of meaning and pleasure. Experience design and happiness understanding experiences. Int J Des 7(3):21–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Hekkert P, Snelders D, Van Wieringen PCW (2003) ‘Most advanced, yet acceptable’: typicality and novelty as joint predictors of aesthetic preference in industrial design. Br J Psychol 94:111–124. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712603762842147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermosa-Perrino, C., Burmester, M., Spohrer, A., Fink, V., & Zeiner, K. M. (2021). The Positive X-Warum klappt das eigentlich nicht? Über die Herausforderungen und Schwierigkeiten bei der Integration von Positive UX im. In E. Ludewig & T. Jackstädt (Eds.), Mensch und Computer 2021 – Usability Professionals. Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. und die German UPA e.V. https://doi.org/10.18420/muc2021-up-157

  • Hermosa Perrino C, Burmester M (2020) Designing for temporal harmony: exploring the well-being concept for designing the temporal dimension of user experience. Multimodal Technol Interact 4(3):66. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti4030066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtzblatt K, Beyer H (2016) Contextual design: design for life. Morgan Kaufmann

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornbæk K, Hertzum M (2017) Technology acceptance and user experience: a review of the experiential component in HCI. ACM Trans Comput-Hum Interact 24(5):1–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3127358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber J (1995) Nachhaltige Entwicklung. Strategien für eine Ökologische und Soziale Erdpolitik; Sigma, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 13407. (1999). Human-Centred Design Processes for Interactive Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 27501. (2019). The human-centred organization – Guidance for managers. Beuth Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 9241-11. (2018). Ergonomics of human-system interaction – Part 11: Usability: Definitions and concepts.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 9241-210. (2010). Ergonomics of human-system interaction – Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems (Vol. 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 9241-210 (2019) Ergonomics of human-system interaction – Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonas W (2007). Design research and its meaning to the methodological development of the discipline. In: Design research now. Birkhäuser Basel, pp 187–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Joore P, Brezet H (2014) A multilevel design model: the mutual relationship between product-service system development and societal change processes. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagan S, Hauerwaas A, Helldorff S, Weisenfeld U (2020) Jamming sustainable futures: assessing the potential of design thinking with the case study of a sustainability jam. J Clean Prod 251:119595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler S (2015) The “sharing economy” is dead, and we killed it. Fast Company, p 14

    Google Scholar 

  • Klapperich H, Laschke M, Hassenzahl M (2018) The positive practice canvas – gathering inspiration for wellbeing-driven design. In: Proceeding NordiCHI’18, September 29-October 3, 2018, Oslo, Norway. https://doi.org/10.1145/3240167.3240209

  • Kohler K, Niebuhr S, Hassenzahl M (2007) Stay on the ball! In: An interaction pattern approach to the engineering of motivation. Lecture notes in computer science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol 4662. LNCS(PART 1):519–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74796-3_51

  • Khor KS, Hazen BT (2017) Remanufactured products purchase intentions and behaviour: evidence from Malaysia. Int J Prod Res 55(8):2149–2162. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2016.1194534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulzer M, Burmester M (2018) Outstanding UX - Eine systematische Untersuchung von Wow-Effekten. Tagungsband Der Mensch Und Computer

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulzer M, Burmester M (2020) Towards explainable and sustainable wow experiences with technology. Multimodal Technol Interact 4(3):1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti4030049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laib M, Burmester M, Zeiner KM, Schippert K, Holl M-L, Hennig D (2018) Better together - Unterstützung des positiven Erlebnisses der Zusammenarbeit durch Softwaregestaltung. In: Brohm-Badry M, Peiffer C, Greve J, Berend B (eds) Wie Menschen wachsen - Positiv-Psychologische Entwicklung von Individuum, Organisation und Gesellschaft, pp 73–90 Pabst Science Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Laib M, Haspel C, Stockinger C, Polanski-Schräder L, Dücker P, Voll K, Schiffrer P, Burmester M (2022) Wellbeing at work—emotional impact on workers using a worker guidance system designed for positive user experience. Multimodal Technol Interact 876(10):1–31. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti6100087

  • Law ELC, Roto V, Hassenzahl M, Vermeeren APOS, Kort J (2009) Understanding, scoping and defining user experience: a survey approach. In: Proceedings of the 27th international conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 719–728. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1518701.1518813

  • Li X, Wang Z, Chen C-H, Zheng P (2021) A data-driven reversible framework for achieving sustainable smart product-service systems. J Clean Prod 279:123618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lofthouse V, Prendeville S (2018) Human-centred design of products and services for the circular economy–a review. Des J 21(4):451–476

    Google Scholar 

  • Luiten H, Knot M, van der Horst T (2001) Sustainable product-service-systems: the kathalys method. In: Proceedings second international symposium on environmentally conscious design and inverse manufacturing. second international symposium on environmentally conscious design and inverse manufacturing. Tokyo, Japan, 11–15 Dec. 2001: IEEE Comput. Soc, pp S.190–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon AR, Brewer SK, Areán PA (2020) Leveraging human-centered design to implement modern psychological science: return on an early investment. Am Psychol 75(8):1067–1079. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makov T, Font Vivanco D (2018) Does the circular economy grow the pie? The case of rebound effects from smartphone reuse. Frontiers in Energy Research 6:39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morató J, Jiménez LM, et al (2019) Situación Y Evolución De La Economía Circular En España. Decembre 2021. https://cotec.es/observacion/economia-circular/f62c16db-5823-deb4-7986-a786e5c3401c

  • Marwede M, Scholz R (2022) Can actant-centric system analyses and sustainable value proposition methods be an approach to sufficiency? In Augsten A, Wölfel C, Frye A, Köck M (eds) Design × Sustainability: Materiality/Systems/Shared Prosperity, pp 98–101. https://doi.org/10.25368/2022.294

  • Mahlke S, Thüring M (2007) Studying antecedents of emotional experiences in interactive contexts. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems - CHI ’07, 915. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240762

  • Meidl R (2021). Disentangling circular economy, sustainability, and waste management principles. Issue brief no. 07.29.21. Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer MW, Norman D (2020) Changing design education for the 21st century. She Ji 6(1):13–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2019.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mugge R (2008) Emotional bonding with products: investigating product attachment from a design perspective. in investigating product attachment from a design perspective. VDM Verlag Dr. Müller

    Google Scholar 

  • Mugge R, Schifferstein HNJ, Schoormans JPL (2010) Product attachment and satisfaction: Understanding consumers’ post-purchase behavior. J Consum Mark 27(3):271–282. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363761011038347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mugge R, Schoormans JPL (2006) A longitudinal study of product attachment and its determinants. Adv Consum Res 7:641–647

    Google Scholar 

  • Mugge R, Schoormans JPL, Schiffersteinb HNJ (2009) Emotional bonding with personalised products. J Eng Des 20(5):467–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544820802698550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman DA (1986) Cognitive Engineering. In: Norman DA, Draper SW (eds) User centered system design. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp 31–61

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Oehme A (2011) Ästhetisches Verständnis und ästhetische Wertschätzung von Automobildesign. Eine Frage der Expertise. Doctoral Dissertation. Universität Potsdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters D, Ahmadpour N, Calvo RA (2020) Tools for wellbeing-supportive design: features, characteristics, and prototypes. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 4(3):1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti4030040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters D, Calvo RA, Ryan RM (2018) Designing for motivation, engagement and wellbeing in digital experience. Front Psychol 9(MAY):1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pieroni M, Marques C, Campese C, Guzzo D, Mendes G, Costa J et al (2016) Transforming a traditional product offer into PSS: a practical application. Procedia CIRP 47:412–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pieroni de Pádua M, Marques CAN, Moraes RN, Rozenfeld H, Ometto AR (2017) PSS Design Process Models: Are They Sustainability-oriented? In: Procedia CIRP 64, S. 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.040

  • Placek M (2019) Market share of power tools worldwide in 2015 and 2019, with a forecast for 2027, by end users. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1228944

  • Pohlmeyer A, Hecht M, Blessing L (2009) User experience lifecycle model ContinUE [continuous user experience]. In: Lichtenstein A, Stößel C, Clemens C (eds) Der Mensch im Mittepunkt technischer systeme. VDI-Verlag, pp 314–317. https://www.tu-berlin.de/fileadmin/f25/dokumente/8BWMMS/15.5-Pohlmeyer.pdf

  • Ries E (2011) The lean startup: how constant innovation creates radically successful. Portfolio Penguin

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossman JR, Duerden MD (2019) Designing experiences. Columbia University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosson MB, Carroll JM (2003) Scenario-based design. In: Jacko JA, Sears A (eds), The human-computer interaction handbook: fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp 1032–1050. https://doi.org/10.2307/798660

  • Sanders EB-N, Stappers JP (2014) Probes, toolkits and prototypes: three approaches to making in codesigning. CoDesign 10(1):5–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2014.888183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassanelli C, Rosa P, Rocca R, Terzi S (2019) Circular economy performance assessment methods: a systematic literature review. J Clean Prod 229:440–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Bleek F (1998) The MIPS-concept. Environmental behaviour and quality of life: ecological, sociological, psychological and communicational indicators of sustainability, 27—40

    Google Scholar 

  • Selvefors A, Rexfelt O, Renström S, Strömberg H (2019) (2019) Use to use—a user perspective on product circularity. J Clean Prod 223:1014–1028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon KM, Elliot AJ, Kim Y, Kasser T (2001) What is satisfying about satisfying events? Testing 10 candidate psychological needs. J Pers Soc Psychol 80(2):325–339. https://doi.org/10.1037//O022-3514.80.2.325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song W, Niu Z, Zheng P (2021) Design concept evaluation of smart product-service systems considering sustainability: An integrated method. Comput Ind Eng 159:107485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahel WR (2019) The circular economy: a user’s guide. Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tuch AN, Hornbæk K (2015) Does Herzberg’s notion of hygienes and motivators apply to user experience? ACM Trans Comput-Hum Interact (TOCHI) 22(4), 16:1–16:24. https://doi.org/10.1145/2724710

  • Tuch AN, Trusell RN, Hornbæk K (2013) Analyzing users’ narratives to understand experience with interactive products. In: Proceedings of CHI 13, April 27–May 2, 2013, Paris, France, pp 2079–2088. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481285

  • Tuch AN, van Schaik P, Hornbæk K (2016) Leisure and work, good and bad: the role of activity domain and valence in modeling user experience. ACM Trans Comput-Hum Interact (TOCHI) 23(6):35. https://doi.org/10.1145/2994147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tugade MM, Fredrickson BL (2004) Resilient individuals use positive emotions to bounce back from negative emotional experiences 86(2):320–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.7.678.Positive

  • Tukker A, Berg C, Tischner U (2017) Product-services: a specific value proposition. New Bus Old Eur, 22–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhlmann J, Wölfel C, Krzywinski J (2016) Experience—a central concept in design and its roots in the history of science. In: Lloyd P, Bohemia E (eds) Future focused thinking - DRS international conference 2016, 50th anniversary conference Brighton, UK. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2016.365

  • United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2022) Visualising circularity. UNEP circularity platform. https://buildingcircularity.org/

  • Velenturf AP, Purnell P (2021) Principles for a sustainable circular economy. Sustain Prod Consum 27:1437–1457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel M, Willner M, Wölfel C, Krzywinski J (2019) User Experience Design für Sicherheitstechnik. In: Stelzer R, Krzywinski J (eds) Entwerfen Entwickeln Erleben in Produktentwicklung und Design, 2, TUD press, pp 219—230

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallner TS, Snel S, Magnier L, Mugge R (2022) Contaminated by its prior use: strategies to design and market refurbished personal care products. Circ Econ Sust. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-022-00197-3

  • Walzberg J, Lonca G, Hanes RJ, Eberle AL, Carpenter A, Heath GA (2021) Do we need a new sustainability assessment method for the circular economy? A critical literature review. Front Sustain 1:12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wölfel C, Krzywinski J (2019) Industrial design engineering: teaching industrial design as a specialisation within a mechanical engineering curriculum. Des Educ Today: Tech Context, Programs Best Pract, 271–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon J (2015) Positive emotional granularity cards

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeiner KM, Burmester M, Fronemann N, Krüger AE (2017) Evaluation von Methoden zur Gestaltung positiver User Experience. In: Hess S, Fischer H (eds) Mensch und computer 2017 – usability professionals, 10.–13. September 2017, Regensburg. Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. und die German UPA e.V., pp 1–11. https://doi.org/10.18420/muc2017-up-0155

  • Zeiner KM, Burmester M, Haasler K, Henschel J, Laib M, Schippert K (2018) Designing for positive user experience in work contexts – experience categories and their applications. Hum Technol 14(2):140–175. https://humantechnology.jyu.fi/archive/vol-14/issue-2/designing-for-positive-user-experience-in-work-contexts

  • Zeiner KM, Haasler K, Henschel J, Laib M, Burmester M (2018) Experience categories in specific contexts – creating positive experiences in smart kitchens. In: Proceedings of the international HCI conference 2018

    Google Scholar 

  • Zink T, Geyer R (2017) Circular economy rebound. J Ind Ecol 21(3):593–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Technische Universität Dresden, 01062, Dresden, Germany

    Christian Wölfel

  2. Hochschule der Medien Stuttgart, 70569, Stuttgart, Germany

    Michael Burmester

Authors
  1. Christian Wölfel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael Burmester
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Wölfel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Health, Arts and Design, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorne, VIC, Australia

    Gavin Brett Melles

  2. Industrial Design Engineering, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany

    Christian Wölfel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wölfel, C., Burmester, M. (2024). Addressing Psychological Needs in Designing for a Sustainable Circular Economy. In: Melles, G.B., Wölfel, C. (eds) Design for a Sustainable Circular Economy . Design Science and Innovation. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7532-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7532-7_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-7531-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-7532-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation