Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Content Validity of a Measurement Instrument for the Reception of the “Virtual” Mass

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Communication and Applied Technologies (ICOMTA 2023)

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 375))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 100 Accesses

Abstract

The health emergency condition produced by COVID-19 generated, as a preventive measure, quarantine in various parts of the world, making it impossible for the Catholic Church to celebrate. One response toward this situation was the transmission of the mass by digital means. In this study, an instrument to measure the reception that the transmission of the “virtual” mass has achieved among the Catholics and the assessment of the said experience was developed. Its design is instrumental because content validity has been carried out through expert judgment. Aiken’s V coefficient indicates that the degree of agreement between them was greater than 70, concluding that the instrument is good and therefore valid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS): Alocución de apertura del Director General de la OMS en la rueda de prensa sobre la COVID-19 celebrada el 11 de marzo de 2020. https://www.who.int/es/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020

  2. Comisiones Episcopales de Liturgia y de Medios de Comunicación Social: Directorio litúrgico para la retransmisión de las misas por radio y televisión. In: Pardo, A. (ed.) Enchiridion. Documentación litúrgica posconciliar. pp. 446–452. Editiorial Regina, Barcelona, España (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  3. X Assemblea Generale della Conferenza Episcopale Italiana: Norme per la trasmissione televisiva della santa Messa, Italia (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sarah, R.: Nota della Congregazione per il Culto Divino e la Disciplina dei Sacramenti. Nota para los obispos y las conferencias episcopales sobre las celebraciones de la semana santa 2021. https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/ccdds/documents/rc_con_ccdds_doc_20210217_settimanasanta-2021_it.html (2021)

  5. Gobierno del Perú: Decreto Supremo 008-2020-SA. https://busquedas.elperuano.pe/normaslegales/decreto-supremo-que-declara-en-emergencia-sanitaria-a-nivel-decreto-supremo-n-008-2020-sa-1863981-2/ (2020)

  6. Presidencia del Consejo de Ministros: Decreto Supremo No 044–2020-PCM. https://busquedas.elperuano.pe/normaslegales/decreto-supremo-que-declara-estado-de-emergencia-nacional-po-decreto-supremo-n-044-2020-pcm-1864948-2/ (2020)

  7. Mosquera, S.: The impact of the church-state model for an effective guarantee of religious freedom: a study of the Peruvian experience during the COVID-19 pandemic. Laws 10, 1–19 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/laws10020040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Presidencia del Consejo de Ministros: Decreto Supremo N° 170–2020-PCM. https://busquedas.elperuano.pe/normaslegales/decreto-supremo-que-modifica-el-articulo-5-del-decreto-supre-decreto-supremo-n-178-2020-pcm-1900332-2/ (2020)

  9. Presidencia del Consejo de Ministros: Decreto Supremo N° 130–2022-PCM. https://busquedas.elperuano.pe/normaslegales/decreto-supremo-que-deroga-el-decreto-supremo-n-016-2022-pc-decreto-supremo-n-130-2022-pcm-2119571-1/ (2022)

  10. Guillot-Valdés, M., Guillén-Riquelme, A., Buela-Casal, G.: Content validity through expert judgment for the depression clinical evaluation test. Int. J. Clin. Heal. Psychol. 22, 1–8 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2022.100292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Muñiz, J., Fonseca-Pedrero, E.: Diez pasos para la construcción de un test. Psicothema 31, 7–16 (2019). https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2018.291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Robles, P., Rojas, M.D.C.: La validación por juicio de expertos: dos investigaciones cualitativas en Lingüística aplicada. Rev. Nebrija Lingüística Apl. a La Enseñanza Lenguas. 18, 1–16 (2015) https://doi.org/10.26378/rnlael918259

  13. Arias, M.M., Giraldo, C.V.: El rigor científico en la investigación cualitativa. El rigor científico en la Investig. Cual. O rigor científico na Investig. Qual. Sci. rigor Qual. Res. 29, 500–514 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Galicia, L.A., Balderrama, J.A., Edel, R.: Validez de contenido por juicio de expertos: propuesta de una herramienta virtual. Apertura. 9, 42–53 (2017). https://doi.org/10.32870/ap.v9n2.993

  15. López, R., Avello, R., Palmero, D., Sánchez, S., Quintana, M.: Validación de instrumentos como garantía de la credibilidad en las investigaciones científicas. Rev. Cuba. Med. Mil. 48, 441–450 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  16. McGartland, D., Berg-Weger, M., Tebb, S.S., Lee, E.S., Rauch, S.: Objectifying content validity: conducting a content validity study in social. Soc. Work Res. 27, 94–104 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/27.2.94

  17. Creswell, J.W., Creswell, J.D.: Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks, California (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kuzmanić, M.: Validity in qualitative research: Interview and the appearance of truth through dialogue. Horizons Psychol. 18, 39–50 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zamanzadeh, V., Ghahramanian, A., Rassouli, M., Abbaszadeh, A., Alavi-Majd, H.: Design and implementation content validity study: development of an instrument for measuring patient-centered communication. J. Caring Sci. 4, 165–178 (2015). https://doi.org/10.15171/jcs.2015.017

  20. Rusticus, S.: Content validity BT. In: Michalos, A.C. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research, pp. 1261–1262. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_553

  21. Almanasreh, E., Moles, R., Chen, T.F.: Evaluation of methods used for estimating content validity. Res. Soc. Adm. Pharm. 15, 214–221 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.03.066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ding, C.S., Hershberger, S.L.: Assessing content validity and content equivalence using structural equation modeling. Struct. Equ. Model. A Multidiscip. J. 9, 283–297 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_7

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Muñiz, J., Elosua, P., Hambleton, R.K.: Directrices para la traducción y adaptación de los tests: Segunda edición. Psicothema 25, 151–157 (2013). https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Benoit, K., Wiesehomeier, N.: Expert Judgments. In: Pickel, S., Pickel, G., Lauth, H.-J., Jahn, D. (eds.) Methoden der vergleichenden Politik- und Sozialwissenschaft: Neue Entwicklungen und Anwendungen, pp. 497–516. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91826-6_25

  25. Cabero, J., Llorente, M. del C.: La aplicación del juicio de experto como técnica de evaluación de las tecnologías de la información y comunicación (TIC). Eduweb. Rev. Tecnol. Inf. y Comun. en Educ. 7, 11–22 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Skjong, R., Wentworth, B.H.: Expert judgment and risk perception. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh (2001) International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, pp. 537–544. International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers, Stavanger, Norway (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ato, M., López, J.J., Benavente, A.: Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en Psicología. An. Psicol. 29, 1038–1059 (2013). https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Escobar-Pérez, J., Cuervo-Martínez, Á.: Validez de contenido y juicio de expertos: Una aproximación a su utilización. Av. en Medición. 6, 27–36 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gallardo-Echenique, E., Marqués Molias, L., Gomez Cruz, O.D., De Lira Cruz, R.: Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the “Student communication & study habits” questionnaire to the Mexican context. In: Proceedings—14th Latin American Conference on Learning Technologies, LACLO 2019, pp. 104–109. IEEE, San Jose Del Cabo, Mexico (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/LACLO49268.2019.00027

  30. Powell, C.: The Delphi technique: Myths and realities. J. Adv. Nurs.Nurs. 41, 376–382 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02537.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lynn, M.R.: Determination and quantification of content validity (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hyrkäs, K., Appelqvist-Schmidlechner, K., Oksa, L.: Validating an instrument for clinical supervision using an expert panel. Int. J. Nurs. Stud.Nurs. Stud. 40, 619–625 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7489(03)00036-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Soriano, A.M.: Diseño y validación de instrumentos de medición. Diá-logos. 14, 19–40 (2014). https://doi.org/10.5377/dialogos.v0i14.2202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Merino, C., Livia, J.: Intervalos de confianza asimétricos para el índice la validez de contenido: Un programa Visual Basic para la V de Aiken. An. Psicol. / Ann. Psychol. 25, 169–171 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Penfield, R.D., Giacobbi, P.R.: Applying a score confidence interval to Aiken’s item content-relevance index. Meas. Phys. Educ. Exerc. Sci.Exerc. Sci. 8, 213–225 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327841mpee0804_3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Touron, J., Martin, D., Navarro Asencio, E., Pradas, S., Inigo, V.: Validación de constructo de un instrumento para medir la competencia digital docente de los profesores (CDD). Rev. Española Pedagog. 75, 25–54 (2018). https://doi.org/10.22550/REP76-1-2018-02

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Facultad de Teología Pontificia y Civil de Lima, 15086, Lima, Perú

    Pedro Hidalgo-Díaz, André Noborikawa-Ajito, Mario Valdivia-Marquina & Diego Vega-Holguin

  2. Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Lima, 15023, Perú

    Ambrosio Tomás-Rojas & Eliana Gallardo-Echenique

Authors
  1. Pedro Hidalgo-Díaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. André Noborikawa-Ajito
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mario Valdivia-Marquina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Diego Vega-Holguin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ambrosio Tomás-Rojas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Eliana Gallardo-Echenique
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eliana Gallardo-Echenique .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Málaga, Spain

    Daniel Barredo Ibáñez

  2. Rúa da Maestranza, A Coruña, Spain

    Laura M. Castro

  3. Complejo Cultural Universitario, Puebla, Mexico

    Araceli Espinosa

  4. Circunvalación ao Campus Universitario, Vigo, Spain

    Iván Puentes-Rivera

  5. Campus Vida, Avenida do Doutor Ángel Jorge Echeverri, Santiago de Compostela, Spain

    Paulo Carlos López-López

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hidalgo-Díaz, P., Noborikawa-Ajito, A., Valdivia-Marquina, M., Vega-Holguin, D., Tomás-Rojas, A., Gallardo-Echenique, E. (2024). Content Validity of a Measurement Instrument for the Reception of the “Virtual” Mass. In: Ibáñez, D.B., Castro, L.M., Espinosa, A., Puentes-Rivera, I., López-López, P.C. (eds) Communication and Applied Technologies. ICOMTA 2023. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 375. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7210-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation