Skip to main content

Craniofacial and Cervical Aesthetic Surgical Outcome Analysis Using Visual Similarity Metrics

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Fourth International Conference on Image Processing and Capsule Networks (ICIPCN 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 798))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 165 Accesses

Abstract

Head and neck (face) operations focused on augmenting or changing a person’s facial characteristics have seen notable breakthroughs in plastic surgery. For medical experts and patients seeking such therapies, the careful assessment of results and efficacy in head and neck plastic surgery is of utmost importance. This study article offers an in-depth examination of several image similarity measures specially designed for assessing face alterations brought on by cosmetic surgery treatments. The proposed evaluation methodology incorporates specialized measurements, including the Facial Symmetry Index (FSI), Facial Proportion Index (FPI), Euclidean Distance of Facial Landmarks (EDFL), and Perceptual Hashing (PH), providing a precise and reliable assessment of surgical results. The field of head and neck plastic surgery has increased patient satisfaction by combining these cutting-edge measures, according to medical experts and people.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Steinbacher DM (2015) Three-dimensional analysis and surgical planning in craniomaxillofacial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 73(12):S40–S56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ho C-T, Lin HH, Liou EJ, Lo LL (2017) Three-dimensional surgical simulation improves the planning for correction of facial prognathism and asymmetry: a qualitative and quantitative study. Sci Rep 7(1):40423

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vannier MW, Pilgram TK, Bhatia G, Brunsden B, Nemecek JR, Young VL (1993) Quantitative three-dimensional assessment of face-lift with an optical facial surface scanner. Ann Plast Surg 30(3):204–211. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-199303000-00002. PMID: 8494301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lekakis G, Hens G, Claes P, Hellings PW Three-dimensional morphing and its added value in the Rhinoplasty consult. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 7(1):e2063. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002063. PMID: 30859032; PMCID: PMC6382239

  5. Iblher N, Manegold S, Porzelius C, Stark GB (2012) Morphometric long-term evaluation and comparison of brow position and shape after endoscopic forehead lift and transpalpebral browpexy. Plast Reconstr Surg 130(6):830e–840e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31826d9f37. PMID: 23190834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Topsakal O, Dobratz EJ, Akbas MI, Dougherty WM, Akinci TC, Celikoyar MM (2023) Utilization of machine learning for the objective assessment of rhinoplasty outcomes. IEEE Access 11:42135–42145. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3270438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Quan W, Ye Z, Matuszewski BJ (2023) Development of landmark-based facial asymmetry evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 2023 6th international conference on image and graphics processing, pp 90–96

    Google Scholar 

  8. Patel A, Islam SM, Murray K, Goonewardene MS (2015) Facial asymmetry assessment in adults using three-dimensional surface imaging. Prog Orthod 16:36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-015-0106-9. Epub 2015 Oct 21. PMID: 26490376; PMCID: PMC4614853

  9. Lekakis G, Claes P, Hamilton GS 3rd, Hellings PW (2016) Three-dimensional surface imaging and the continuous evolution of preoperative and postoperative assessment in rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 32(1):88–94. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1570122. Epub 2016 Feb 10 PMID: 26862969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Blasi A, Nucera R, Ronsivalle V, Candida E, Grippaudo C (2022) Asymmetry index for the photogrammetric assessment of facial asymmetry. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 162(3):394–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.04.030. Epub 2022 May 11 PMID: 35562291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Varma MSSK, Abhishek S, Dandu S, Anjali T (2023) Human face detection and recognition using artificial intelligence. In: 2023 7th international conference on trends in electronics and informatics (ICOEI), pp 769–775 IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yaswanthram P, Sabarish BA (2022) Face recognition using machine learning models—comparative analysis and impact of dimensionality reduction. In: 2022 IEEE fourth international conference on advances in electronics, computers and communications (ICAECC), Bengaluru, India, pp 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAECC54045.2022.9716590

  13. Divya MBS, Prajwala NB (2018) Facial expression recognition by calculating euclidian distance for eigen faces using PCA. In: 2018 international conference on communication and signal processing (ICCSP), pp 0244–0248 IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  14. Narayanankutty H, Srinivasan C (2020) Novel authentication system for personal and domestic network systems using image feature comparison and digital signatures

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kumar, Senthil T, Rakesh PB (2011) 3D reconstruction of facial structures from 2D images for cosmetic surgery. In: 2011 international conference on recent trends in information technology (ICRTIT), pp 743–748 IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  16. Krishnadas A, Iyer S, Balasubramaniam D, Subash P, Subramaniam N, Kapahtia R, Pullan S, Ramu J (2023) Simplified virtual surgical planning method for reconstruction of secondary maxilla and mandibular defects using free bone flap. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 22(Suppl 1):105–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Abhishek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Abhishek, S., Prakash, P., Anjali, T., Vijayaraghavan, S. (2023). Craniofacial and Cervical Aesthetic Surgical Outcome Analysis Using Visual Similarity Metrics. In: Shakya, S., Tavares, J.M.R.S., Fernández-Caballero, A., Papakostas, G. (eds) Fourth International Conference on Image Processing and Capsule Networks. ICIPCN 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 798. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7093-3_34

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics