Skip to main content

A Parallel Signal Detector Approach for Detection of Human Activities Using Multiple Seismic Sensors

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Emerging Electronics and Automation (E2A 2022)

Abstract

Intrusion detection systems play an important role in the protection of vital installations and automated monitoring of unmanned areas. Seismic sensors such as geophones are used for sensing the ground vibrations caused due to human activities. These sensors are being employed for the covert detection of seismic signatures. This study investigates an in-depth analysis of different parameters of a signal detection algorithm STA/LTA for efficient detection of ground vibrations caused due human activities. High false alarm rates frequently limit the effectiveness of unattended ground sensor (UGS) systems, presumably as a result of flaws in the underlying algorithms and constraints in onboard computation. A real-time energy-based parallel recursive STA/LTA algorithm using a 32-bit analog-to-digital converter (ADC) with an ARM microprocessor is developed. The real-time detected event data is utilized for the optimization of the STA window length, and threshold values. Machine learning models such as support vector machines (SVM) with different kernels, k-nearest neighbor (kNN), and random forest are trained to classify the human activities. A STA window length of 300 samples with triggering thresholds (Ton = 2.7 and Toff = 1.8) achieves highest detection F1 score of ~ 0.74 with 81.7% accuracy of random forest classifier.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hussain Z, Sheng M, Zhang WE (2019) Different approaches for human activity recognition. a survey. ArXiv. pp 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102738

  2. Anchal S, Mukhopadhyay B, Kar S (2021) Person identification and imposter detection using footstep generated seismic signals. IEEE Trans Instrum Measurem 70. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2020.3022486

  3. Jin X, Sarkar S, Ray A, Gupta S, Damarla T (2012) Target detection and classification using seismic and PIR sensors. IEEE Sens J 12:1709–1718. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2011.2177257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Horak D, Burne RA (2009) US Patent 7, 616, 115, 2009, U.: sensor for detecting human intruders, and security system. Google Patents

    Google Scholar 

  5. Duarte MF, Hu YH (2004) Vehicle classification in distributed sensor networks. J Parallel Distrib Comput 64:826–838. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JPDC.2004.03.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dantcheva A, Elia P, Ross A (2016) What else does your biometric data reveal? A survey on soft biometrics. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 11:441–467. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2015.2480381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lan J, Lan T, Nahavandi S (2004) A novel application of a microaccelerometer for target classification. IEEE Sens J 4:519–524. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2004.830950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pan S, Wang N, Qian Y, Velibeyoglu I, Noh HY, Zhang P (2015) Indoor person identification through footstep induced structural vibration. In: International workshop on mobile computing systems and applications, pp 81–86. https://doi.org/10.1145/2699343.2699364

  9. Mehmood A, Patel VM, Damarla T (2012) Discrimination of bipeds from quadrupeds using seismic footstep signatures. In: International geoscience and remote sensing symposium (IGARSS). pp 6920–6923. https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2012.6352571

  10. Koç G, Yegin K (2013) Footstep and vehicle detection using slow and quick adaptive thresholds algorithm. Int J Distrib Sens Netw 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/783604

  11. Anchal S, Mukhopadhyay B, Kar S (2017) UREDT: unsupervised learning based real-time footfall event detection technique in seismic signal. IEEE Sens Lett 2:1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mukhopadhyay B, Anchal S, Kar S (2018) Detection of an intruder and prediction of his state of motion by using seismic sensor. IEEE Sens J 18:703–712. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2017.2776127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ghosh R, Vajpeyi A, Akula A, Shaw V, Kumar S, Sardana HK (2020) Performance evaluation of a real-time seismic detection system based on CFAR detectors. IEEE Sens J 20:3678–3686. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2019.2959652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chakraborty M, Srinivasan A, Reddy S, Kumar Mandal S, Bhaumik S (2021) Human action classification using seismic sensor and machine learning techniques. In: International conference on information systems and computer networks, ISCON vol 2021. pp 2–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCON52037.2021.9702317

  15. Parihar DS, Ghosh R, Akula A, Kumar S, Sardana HK (2021) Seismic signal analysis for the characterisation of elephant movements in a forest environment. Ecol Inform 64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101329

  16. Bin K, Lin J, Tong X (2022) Edge intelligence-based moving target classification using compressed seismic measurements and convolutional neural networks. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 19. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2021.3055795

  17. Young C, Beiriger J, Harris M, Trujillo J (2019) Waveform correlation event detection system (No. SAND-95–1831C; CONF-950954–2). Sandia National Lab (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Peterson L (2009) K-nearest neighbor. Scholarpedia 4.2:1883. https://doi.org/10.4249/SCHOLARPEDIA.1883

  19. Wang L (2005) In: Support vector machines: theory and applications. vol 177. Springer Science & Business Media

    Google Scholar 

  20. Liaw A, Wiener M (2002) Classification and regression by randomforest. R news 2(3):18–22

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pal M (2007) Random forest classifier for remote sensing classification. vol 26. pp 217–222.https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160412331269698

  22. Hehn TM, Kooij JFP, Hamprecht FA (2020) End-to-end learning of decision trees and forests. Int J Comput Vision 128:997–1011. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11263-019-01237-6/TABLES/3

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge NITTTR Chandigarh and Centre of Excellence for Intelligent Sensors and Systems (iSenS), CSIR-CSIO, Chandigarh for providing the resources for carrying out this research activity. The research work has been partially supported from CSIR-CSIO’s In-house project Grant OLP246. The authors also acknowledge the contribution of research fellows and project associates of iSenS for their support during experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ripul Ghosh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Walia, R., Singh, M., Verma, P., Ghosh, R. (2024). A Parallel Signal Detector Approach for Detection of Human Activities Using Multiple Seismic Sensors. In: Gabbouj, M., Pandey, S.S., Garg, H.K., Hazra, R. (eds) Emerging Electronics and Automation. E2A 2022. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 1088. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6855-8_43

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics