Abstract
Today’s brutal competition environment has made it a necessity for businesses to evaluate their performance in order to maintain their existence and gain sustainable competitive advantage. The current environment does not allow businesses that do not perform performance evaluations a chance to survive. Therefore, corporate performance evaluation is a multi-criteria, complex and uncertain real-life problem that is vital for businesses. Corporate performance should be measured multi-dimensionally, but performance indicators of these dimensions may not always be expressed with a numerical value or may have uncertainty. In this case, the closest results are obtained by using fuzzy logic. Based on the current importance of the subject, a fuzzy model has been developed for the evaluation of corporate performance in this study. The outputs of the model are total enterprise performance, corporate reputation and financial output. Although the number of inputs used for each output varies, the inputs used in the model are the environment, customers, society, government, competitors, suppliers, business processes and sustainability. The application of the model is demonstrated with a case study using the fuzzy logic toolbox of the MATLAB program. Performance values for “Total Enterprise Performance”, “Corporate Reputation” and “Financial Output” were obtained as 16.9, 16.9 and 20.8, respectively.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Trumpp, C., Endrikat, J., Zopf, C., Guenther, E.: Definition, conceptualization, and measurement of corporate environmental performance: a critical examination of a multidimensional construct. J. Bus. Ethics 126, 185–204 (2015)
Barnabe, F.: A “system dynamics-based balanced scorecard” to support strategic decision making: insights from a case study. Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag. 60(5), 446–473 (2011)
Chytas, P., Glykas, M., Valiris, G.: A proactive balanced scorecard. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 31, 460–468 (2011)
Searcy, C.: Updating corporate sustainability performance measurement systems. Meas. Bus. Excell. 15(2), 44–56 (2011)
Hester, P.T., Meyers, T.J.: Multi-Criteria performance measurement for public and private sector enterprises. In applications of management science, pp. 183–206. Emerald Group Publishing Limited (2012)
Watts, T., McNair-Connolly, C.J.: New performance measurement and management control systems. J. Appl. Acc. Res. 13(3), 226–241 (2012)
Shaik, M., Abdul-Kader, W.: Performance measurement of reverse logistics enterprise: a comprehensive and integrated approach. Meas. Bus. Excell. 16(2), 23–34 (2012)
Bai, C., Dhavale, D., Sarkis, J.: Integrating fuzzy c-means and TOPSIS for performance evaluation: an application and comparative analysis. Expert Syst. Appl. 41(9), 4186–4196 (2014)
Draghici, A., Popescu, A.D., Gogan, L.M.: A proposed model for monitoring organizational performance. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 124, 544–551 (2014)
Shaik, M.N., Abdul-Kader, W.: Comprehensive performance measurement and causal-effect decision making model for reverse logistics enterprise. Comput. Ind. Eng. 68, 87–103 (2014)
Elbanna, S., Eid, R., Kamel, H.: Measuring hotel performance using the balanced scorecard: a theoretical construct development and its empirical validation. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 51, 105–114 (2015)
Pirozzi, M.G., Ferulano, G.P.: Intellectual capital and performance measurement in healthcare organizations: an integrated new model. J. Intellect. Cap. 17(2), 320–350 (2016)
Valenzuela, L., Maturana, S.: Designing a three-dimensional performance measurement system (SMD3D) for the wine industry: a Chilean example. Agric. Syst. 142, 112–121 (2016)
Yaghoobi, T., Haddadi, F.: Organizational performance measurement by a framework integrating BSC and AHP. Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag. 65(7), 959–976 (2016)
Ponte, D., Pesci, C., Camussone, P.F.: Between mission and revenue: measuring performance in a hybrid organization. Manag. Audit. J. 32(2), 196–214 (2017)
Modak, M., Pathak, K., Ghosh, K.K.: Performance evaluation of outsourcing decision using a BSC and Fuzzy AHP approach: a case of the Indian coal mining organization. Resour. Policy 52, 181–191 (2017)
Abubakar, A., Hilman, H., Kaliappen, N.: New tools for measuring global academic performance. SAGE Open 8(3), 1–10 (2018)
Hussain, T., Edgeman, R., Eskildsen, J., Shoukry, A.M., Gani, S.: Sustainable enterprise excellence: attribute-based assessment protocol. Sustainability 10(11), 4097 (2018)
Fechete, F., Nedelcu, A.: Performance management assessment model for sustainable development. Sustainability 11(10), 2779 (2019)
Longaray, A.A., Ensslin, L., Dutra, A., Ensslin, S., Brasil, R., Munhoz, P.: Using MCDA-C to assess the organizational performance of industries operating at Brazilian maritime port terminals. Operat. Res. Perspect. 6, 100109 (2019)
Liu, J.-W.: Developing GAHP concepts for measurement of travel agency organizational performance. Soft. Comput. 24(11), 8051–8059 (2019)
Machado, M.C., Mendes, E.F., Telles, R., Sampaio, P.: Towards a new model for SME self-assessment: a Brazilian empirical study. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 31(9–10), 1041–1059 (2020)
Mamabolo, A., Myres, K.: Performance measurement in emerging market social enterprises using a balanced scorecard. J. Soc. Entrepreneurship 11(1), 65–87 (2020)
Wang, C.N., Tibo, H., Nguyen, H.A.: Malmquist productivity analysis of top global automobile manufacturers. Mathematics 8(4), 580 (2020)
Taşkan, B., Karatop, B.: Development of the field of organizational performance during the industry 4.0 period. Int. J. Res. Ind. Eng. 11(2), 134–154 (2022)
Juric, M.B., et al.: Design principles for process-driven architectures using oracle bpm and soa suite 12c. Packt Publishing (2015)
Simpson, J., Taylor, J.: Corporate governance ethics and csr. Kogan Page (2013)
Page-Tickell, R.: Learning & development. Kogan Page (2014)
Whipple, B.: Trust in transition: navigating organizational change. American Society for Training & Development (2014)
Kulkarni, S.P.: Environmental ethics and information asymmetry among organizational stakeholders. J. Bus. Ethics 27, 215–228 (2000)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Taşkan, B., Karatop, B., Kubat, C. (2024). A Fuzzy Logic Approach for Corporate Performance Evaluation. In: Şen, Z., Uygun, Ö., Erden, C. (eds) Advances in Intelligent Manufacturing and Service System Informatics. IMSS 2023. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6062-0_69
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6062-0_69
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-6061-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-6062-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)