Skip to main content

Project Idea Selection in an Automotive R&D Center

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Intelligent Manufacturing and Service System Informatics (IMSS 2023)

Abstract

R&D project selection is one of the most important issues for an R&D center. Evaluating more than one project in terms of different criteria, selecting and implementing the most appropriate project is very critical for both the company’s profit and the sustainability of the project. The project selection process is handled by different processes in companies. Due to the importance of this issue, companies adopt a selection process in line with their own strategies. In this study, an application was carried out with the fuzzy TOPSIS method to evaluate alternative project ideas that will be an R&D project in the R&D center of an automotive company. 4 different criteria were evaluated by experts for 6 different project ideas. With the implementation realized as a result of expert evaluations, a priority order was obtained for 6 project ideas. In practice, as a result of the evaluation, the alternative project P5 with the highest value in the ranking is selected as the next R&D project to be started.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mohanty, R.P., Agarwal, R., Choudhury, A.K., Tiwari, M.K.: A fuzzy ANP-based approach to R&D project selection: a case study. Int. J. Prod. Res. 43(24), 5199–5216 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Meade, L.M., Presley, A.: R&D project selection using the analytic network process. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 49(1), 59–66 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ghasemzadeh, F., Archer, N.P.: Project portfolio selection through decision support. Decis. Supp. Syst. 29, 73–88 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Henriksen, A.D., Traynor, A.J.: A practical R&D project-selection scoring tool. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 46, 158–170 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ringuest, J.L., Graves, S.B., Case, R.H.: Mean-Gini analysis in R&D portfolio selection. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 154, 157–169 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Lawson, C.P., Longhurst, P.J., Ivey, P.C.: The application of a new research and development project selection model in SMEs. Technovation 25, 1–9 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Golabi, K.: Selecting a group of dissimilar projects for funding. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 34, 138–145 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bard, J.F., et al.: An interactive approach to R&D project selection and termination. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 35, 135–146 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stewart, T.J.: A multi criteria decision support system for R&D project selection. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 42, 17–26 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Iyigun, M.G.: A decision support system for R&D project selection and resource allocation under uncertainty. Proj. Manag. J. 24, 5–13 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Turner, J.R., Cochrane, R.A.: Goals and methods matrix: coping with projects with ill-defined goals and/or methods of achieving them. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 11, 93–102 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chui, Y.C., Chan, S.P.: Fuzzy cash flow analysis using present worth criterion. Eng. Econ. 39, 113–138 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Saaty, T.L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Liberatore, M.J.: An expert system for R&D project selection. Math. Comput. Model. 11, 260–265 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Brenner, M.S.: Practical R&D project prioritization. Res. Technol. Manag. 28, 38–42 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yıldırım, B.F., Yıldırım, S.K.: A new integrated intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making approach for R&D project selection process. J. Eng. Sci. Des. 10(2), 643–653 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chen, C.T.: Extensions of the topsis for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 114, 1–9 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Sun, C.C.: A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert Syst. Appl. 37, 7745–7754 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Şen, Z.: Bulanık Mantık İlkeleri ve Modelleme. Su Vakfı Yayınları (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K.: Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, A State-of-the-Art Survey. Springer, New York (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9

  21. Pervez, A.K.M.K., Maniruzzaman, M., Shah, A.A., Nabi, N., Ado, A.M.: The meagerness of simple Likert scale in assessing risk: how appropriate the fuzzy Likert is? Nust J. Soc. Sci. Humanit. 6(2), 138–150 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulviye Savaş .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Savaş, U., Altuntaş, S. (2024). Project Idea Selection in an Automotive R&D Center. In: Şen, Z., Uygun, Ö., Erden, C. (eds) Advances in Intelligent Manufacturing and Service System Informatics. IMSS 2023. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6062-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6062-0_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-6061-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-6062-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics