Skip to main content

Prediction of Tribological Behaviour of AA5083/CSA-ZnO Hybrid Composites Using Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Techniques

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Structural Composite Materials

Part of the book series: Composites Science and Technology ((CST))

  • 184 Accesses

Abstract

Aluminium Alloys AA5083 dispersed with varying fractions of reinforcement was fabricated through the stir casting method. In varying weight percentage combinations, zinc oxide (ZnO) and coconut shell ash (CSA) particles were combined to create hybrid reinforcement particles. Using a pin-on-disc tribometer, the wear characteristics of the developed AA5083 hybrid composites were estimated. The volumetric proportion of hybrid reinforcement particles CSA (3, 6, 9 and 3 ZnO wt%), load (20, 30, 40 N), sliding velocity (2, 3, and 4 m/s), Cumulative Time (4.16, 5.55, and 8.33 min), and sliding distance are some of the experimental parameters (1000 m). Wear analysis revealed effective bonding and homogeneous dispersion of hybrid reinforcement particles onto the AA5083. Analysis of Specific Wear Rate (SWR) results showed that Specific Wear Rate rose with load, sliding velocity, and sliding duration while decreasing with hybrid particle dispersion. This research proposes the use of several intelligent classification techniques using Machine Learning (ML) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) to predict the wear rate of an AA 5083 hybrid composite. For estimating wear quantities, the algorithms Random Forest (RF), Neural Network (NN), and k-nearest neighbours (kNN) are utilized. Six inputs are utilized to train and evaluate the Machine Learning (ML) algorithms: the Applied Load (N), Sliding Velocity, Sliding Speed, Cumulative Time, Percentage of Reinforcements, and Sliding Distance. The output is the Specific Wear Rate (SWR). The RF, NN, and KNN algorithms all produced success rates of correlation between experimental to anticipated of 0.90, 0.84, and 0.90, respectively. The same model data was utilised to train and evaluate Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), with the Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) network having the lowest Mean Square Error (MSE) to improve machine learning prediction accuracy. Maximum estimate error range of 0.1%, training and cross-validation of 0.00000496 and 0.0261, respectively, with linear correlation coefficient in testing of 0.9999 or 99.9% better prediction accuracy rate. The AA 5083 composites were designed and implemented using this machine learning and artificial neural network model for forecasting specific wear rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ikumapayi OM, Akinlabi ET, Pal SK, Majumdar JD (2019) A survey on reinforcements used in friction stir processing of aluminium metal matrix and hybrid composites. Proc Manuf 35:935–940

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sudherson DPS, Sunil J (2020) Dry sliding wear behaviour of novel AA5083-cadmium alloy prepared by stir casting process. Mater Today: Proc 21:142–147

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang T, Li DY (2001) Improvement in the resistance of aluminum with yttria particles to sliding wear in air and in a corrosive medium. Wear 251(1–12):1250–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Arulraj M, Palani PK (2018) Parametric optimization for improving impact strength of squeeze cast of hybrid metal matrix (LM24–SiC p–coconut shell ash) composite. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 40(1):2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ma X, Chang PR, Yang J, Yu J (2009) Preparation and properties of glycerol plasticized-pea starch/zinc oxide-starch bionanocomposites. Carbohyd Polym 75(3):472–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.08.007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tun KS, Jayaramanavar P, Nguyen QB, Chan J, Kwok R, Gupta M (2012) Investigation into tensile and compressive responses of Mg–ZnO composites. Mater Sci Technol 28(5):582–588

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Selvam B, Marimuthu P, Narayanasamy R, Anandakrishnan V, Tun KS, Gupta M, Kamaraj M (2014) Dry sliding wear behaviour of zinc oxide reinforced magnesium matrix nano-composites. Mater Des 58:475–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jasim AH, Joudi WM, Radhi NS, Saud AN (2020) Mechanical properties and wear characteristic of (aluminum-zinc oxide) metal matrix composite prepared using stir casting process. Mater Sci Forum 1002:175–184. Trans Tech Publications Ltd

    Google Scholar 

  9. Raju RSS, Panigrahi MK, Ganguly RI, Rao GS (2017) Investigation of tribological behavior of a novel hybrid composite prepared with Al-coconut shell ash mixed with graphite. Metall Mater Trans A 48(8):3892–3903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-017-4139-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tang F, Wu X, Ge S, Ye J, Zhu H, Hagiwara M, Schoenung JM (2008) Dry sliding friction and wear properties of B4C particulate-reinforced Al-5083 matrix composites. Wear 264(7–8):555–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2007.04.006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Thiyaneshwaran N, Sureshkumar P (2013) Microstructure, mechanical and wear properties of aluminum 5083 alloy processed by equal channel angular extrusion. Int J Eng Res Technol 2:17–24

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bathula S, Saravanan M, Dhar A (2012) Nanoindentation and wear characteristics of Al 5083/SiCp nanocomposites synthesized by high energy ball milling and spark plasma sintering. J Mater Sci Technol 28(11):969–975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Madakson PB, Yawas DS, Apasi A (2012) Characterization of coconut shell ash for potential utilization in metal matrix composites for automotive applications. Int J Eng Sci Technol 4(3):1190–1198

    Google Scholar 

  14. Daramola OO, Adediran AA, Fadumiye AT (2015) Evaluation of the mechanical properties and corrosion behaviour of coconut shell ash reinforced aluminium (6063) alloy composites. Leonardo Electron J Pract Technol 27:107–119

    Google Scholar 

  15. Agunsoyea JO, Talabib SI, Belloa SA, Awec IO (2014) The effects of Cocos Nucifera (coconut shell) on the mechanical and tribological properties of recycled waste aluminium can composites. Tribol Industry 36(2)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Xue D, Balachandran PV, Hogden J, Theiler J, Xue D, Lookman T (2016) Accelerated search for materials with targeted properties by adaptive design. Nat Commun 7(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Xiong J, Shi SQ, Zhang TY (2020) A machine-learning approach to predicting and understanding the properties of amorphous metallic alloys. Mater Des 187:108378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sarica A, Cerasa A, Quattrone A (2017) Random Forest algorithm for the classification of neuroimaging data in Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review. Front Aging Neurosci 9:329. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2017.00329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Abd Jalil K, Kamarudin MH, Masrek MN (2010) Comparison of machine learning algorithms performance in detecting network intrusion. In: 2010 international conference on networking and information technology. IEEE, pp 221–226

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tretyakov K (2004) Machine learning techniques in spam filtering. In: Data mining problem-oriented seminar, MTAT, vol 3, No 177, pp 60–79. Citeseer

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shataee S, Kalbi S, Fallah A, Pelz D (2012) Forest attribute imputation using machine-learning methods and ASTER data: comparison of k-NN, SVR and random forest regression algorithms. Int J Remote Sens 33(19):6254–6280. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2012.682661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nagaraj A, Gopalakrishnan S (2021) A study on mechanical and tribological properties of aluminium 1100 alloys 6% of RHAp, BAp, CSAp, ZnOp and egg shellp composites by ANN. SILICON 13(10):3367–3376

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mazahery A, Shabani MO (2012) Study on microstructure and abrasive wear behavior of sintered Al matrix composites. Ceram Int 38(5):4263–4269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Alizadeh A, Abdollahi A, Biukani H (2015) Creep behavior and wear resistance of Al 5083 based hybrid composites reinforced with carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and boron carbide (B4C). J Alloy Compd 650:783–793

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhao Q, Liang Y, Zhang Z, Li X, Ren L (2016) Microstructure and dry-Sliding wear behavior of B4C ceramic particulate reinforced Al 5083 matrix composite. Metals 6(9):227

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Nagaraj .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nagaraj, A., Gopalakrishnan, S., Sakthivel, M., Shivalingappa, D. (2024). Prediction of Tribological Behaviour of AA5083/CSA-ZnO Hybrid Composites Using Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Techniques. In: Boppana, S.B., Ramachandra, C.G., Kumar, K.P., Ramesh, S. (eds) Structural Composite Materials. Composites Science and Technology . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5982-2_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics