Abstract
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines for the management of diabetes state that structured diabetes education should be offered to every person and their carer(s) at or around the time of diagnosis, with annual reinforcement and review. In 2016, the UK’s Health and Social Care Information Centre’s National Diabetes Audit for England identified only 6% of newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetics attended a course. Diabetes UK has called for radical improvements to the provision. This study attempts to determine why the uptake has been so poor and then offer possible solutions. The study utilised Bronfenbrenner’s bio-ecology theory and was made up of four phases: phase one, a pilot study of health educators to identify why patients were not attending the courses. Phase two a qualitative review, using thematic analysis, of patients on their views of structured education. Phase three a census investigating the provision of structured education. It compared the 152 Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) with the new 194 Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) in England. Phase four is a qualitative review using thematic analysis of healthcare professionals (HCPs) on their reasons for providing the care they did. NHS England has a decentralisation approach to managing diabetes structured education in England. There is a lack of awareness of these programmes amongst patients. This is driven by the proliferation of courses provided by NHS England and the budget restrictions to promote them. The quality of diabetes structured education and the ability of patients to attend varied by PCT/CCG, creating a non-inclusive service. In this example, it was established that centralising elements of the diabetes structured education programmes like branding, marketing, course development and programme management could alleviate many of the problems that NHS England currently faces and increase patient engagement. Such a move would also reduce costs and help bridge the current budget deficit. This chapter demonstrates how researchers can utilise Bronfenbrenner’s bio-ecology theory to investigate healthcare management processes. More specifically, it is an example of investigating patients, their careers, healthcare professional and policy all in one study. It also addresses a common debate amongst healthcare managers whether systems should be centralised or decentralised.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
A General Practitioner is a family doctor who is the main point of contact for general healthcare for NHS patients.
- 2.
Bronfenbrenner referred to ontogenetic as the development that occurs as a function of experience rather than as a function of the genetic make-up of an individual (see Lambert and Johnson 2011).
- 3.
Now Self-Management UK (see www.selfmanagementuk.org/).
- 4.
Oates (1972) provided an insightful analysis of the trade-off between centralisation and decentralisation by contrasting efficient internalisation of inter-jurisdictional spillovers through centralisation and efficient matching of local policies to local tastes through decentralisation. This analysis culminated in the celebrated ‘Oates’ Decentralization Theorem’, delineating conditions under which centralized or decentralised provision of public goods is efficient. (Bloch and Zenginobuz 2012).
References
Alakeson V (2011) Quality, innovation, productivity and prevention (QIPP) and personal health budgets, (Accessed 21 May, 2022), [available at http://www.in-control.org.uk/resources/health/qipp-and-personal-health-budgetspdf.aspx]
Asada Y, Yoshida Y, Whipp AM (2013) Summarizing social disparities in health. Milbank Q 91(1):5–36
Bankauskaite V, Saltman RB (2007) Central issues in the decentralization debate. In: Saltman RB, Bankauskaite V, Vrangbæk K (eds) Decentralization in health care. Open University Press, Berkshire
Bloch F, Zenginobuz U (2012) Oates’ decentralization theorem with household mobility. hal-00657823. https://hal.science/hal-00657823/document
Bronfenbrenner U (1977) Toward an experimental ecology of human development. Am Psychol 32(7):513
Bronfenbrenner U (1993) Ecological models of human development. In: Gauvain M, Cole M (eds) Readings on the development of children. Freeman, New York, NY, pp 37–43
Bronfenbrenner U (2005) Making human beings human: bioecological perspectives on human development. Sage, London
Bronfenbrenner U, Morris PA (1998) The ecology of developmental processes. In: Damon W, Lerner RM (eds) Handbook of child psychology: vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development, 5th edn. Wiley, New York, NY, pp 793–829
Bronfenbrenner U (1989) The developing ecology of human development: paradigm lost or paradigm regained. Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Kansas City, MO
Clausen JA (1986) The life course: a sociological perspective. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
Codery S (2022) Efficiency asks risk damaging patient care. Accessed 17 May, 2022. Available at https://nhsproviders.org/news-blogs/blogs/efficiency-asks-risk-damaging-patient-care
Coles S, Haire K, Kenny T, Jessop EG (2012) Monitoring access to nationally commissioned services in England. Orphanet J Rare Dis 7(1):85
De Brún C (2013) Finding the evidence: a key step in the information production process. NHS England, London
De Silva D (2011) Evidence: helping people help themselves. The Health Foundation, London
De Vries MS (2000) The rise and fall of decentralization: a comparative analysis of arguments and practices in European countries. Eur J Polit Res 38(2):193–224
DHSC (2001) National service framework for diabetes. Department of Health, London
DHSC (2010b) Change for life, one year on. Department of Health, London
DHSC (2012) Long term conditions compendium of information, 3rd edn. Department of Health, London
DHSC (2010a) The NHS quality, innovation, productivity and prevention challenge: a guide for clinicians. Accessed 11 Aug, 2022. Available at http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130107105354/ http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/%40dh/%40en/%40ps/documents/digitalasset/dh_113807.pdf
DHSC (2011) QIPP workstreams: long term conditions. Accessed 11 Aug, 2022. Available at http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130107105354/ http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Healthcare/Qualityandproductivity/QIPPworkstreams/DH_115448
DHSC (2015a) Policy paper 2010 to 2015 government policy: NHS efficiency. Accessed 24 Aug, 2022. Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/2010-to-2015-government-policy-nhs-efficiency/2010-to-2015government-policy-nhs-efficiency
Diabetes UK (2016) State of the nation: time to take control of diabetes. Accessed 11 June, 2022. Available at https://diabetes-resources-production.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/diabetes-storage/2017-08/DiabetesUK%20State%20of%20the%20Nation.pdf
England NHS (2015) Annual report and accounts 2014–15. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London
NHS England (2014) Action for diabetes. Accessed 17 June, 2022. Available at https://www.england.nhs.uk/ourwork/qual-clin-lead/diabetes-prevention/action-for-diabetes/
Farrer L, Marinetti C, Cavaco YK, Costongs C (2015) Advocacy for health equity: a synthesis review. Milbank Q 93(2):392–437
Foster CD, Plowden FJ (1996) State under stress hollow: can the hollow state be good government? Open University Press, Maidenhead
Foster JE, Sen A (1997) On economic inequality, expanded. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Fronzo C (2016) Questions about the NHS supply chain’s generic specifications project arise at TVS 2016. J Wound Care 25(5):225–226
Frumence G, Nyamhanga T, Mwangu M, Hurtig A (2014) The dependency on central government funding of decentralised health systems: experiences of the challenges and coping strategies in the Kongwa district, Tanzania. BMC Health Serv Res 14(1):39
Gatineau M, Hancock C, Holman N, Outhwaite H, Oldridge L, Christie A, Ells L (2014) Adult obesity and type 2 diabetes. Public Health England, London
Glasgow RE, Davis CL, Funnell MM, Beck A (2003) Implementing practical interventions to support chronic illness self-management. Joint Comm J Qual Patient Saf 29(11):563–574
Graham H (2010) Where is the future in public health? Milbank Q 88(2):149–168
Guest JF, Vowden P, White R, Bowen G, Iversen C, Anderson R (2015) Letters—response to call to action: the proposed national formulary for wound care. J Wound Care 24(12):553–559
Hanif W, Khunti K, Bellary S, Bharaj H, Karamat MA, Patel K, Patel V (2014) Type 2 diabetes in the UK South Asian population. An update from the South Asian health foundation. Accessed 24 Aug, 2022. Available at http://www.sahf.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/Type%202%20Diabetes%20in%20the%20UK%20South%20Asian%20population.pdf
Harper S, King NB, Meersman SC, Reichman ME, Breen N, Lynch J (2010) Implicit value judgments in the measurement of health inequalities. Milbank Q 88(1):4–29
Hayes A, Gray M, Edwards B (2008) Social inclusion: origins, concepts and key themes. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra
Jerant AF, von Friederichs-Fitzwater MM, Moore M (2005) Patients’ perceived barriers to active self-management of chronic conditions. Patient Educ Couns 57(3):300–307
Jervis P, Plowden W (2003) The impact of political devolution on the UK’s health services. The Nuffield Trust, London
Jommi C, Fattore G (2003) Regionalization and drugs cost-sharing in the Italian NHS. Euro Observer 5(3):1–4
Jones A, Pill R, Adams S (2000) Qualitative study of views of health professionals and patients on guided self-management plans for asthma. BMJ 321(7275):1507–1510
Justice (2012) Freedom of information act 2000. (c.36). Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London
Kawachi I, Kennedy BP (2002) The health of nations: why inequality is harmful to your health. New Press, New York
Koivusalo M (1999) Decentralisation and equity of healthcare provision in Finland. BMJ 318(7192):1198
Lambert MC, Johnson LE (2011) Ontogenetic development. In Goldstein S, Naglieri JA (Eds), Encyclopedia of child behavior and development (p. 1037). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79061-9_2018
Lerner RM (2005) Forward—Urie Bronfenbrenner: career contributions of the consummate developmental scientist. In: Bronfenbrenner U (ed) Making human beings human: bioecological perspectives on human development. Sage, London, pp ix–xxvi
Levitas R (2005) The inclusive society?: Social exclusion and New Labour. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke
Mintzberg H (1992) Structure in fives: Designing effective organizations. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
Mintzberg H (1993) Structure in fives: designing effective organizations. Prentice-Hall, London
Morgan S, McMahon M, Mitton C (2006) Centralising drug review to improve coverage decisions. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 5(2):67–73
NICE (2004) Type 1 diabetes: diagnosis and management of type 1 diabetes in children, young people and adults. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London
NICE (2008) Type 2 diabetes NICE clinical guideline 66. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London
NICE (2015) Diabetes in adults: quality standard. Accessed 10 June, 2022. Available at https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/qs6/chapter/quality-statement-1-structured-education
O’Brien M, Penna S (2008) Social exclusion in Europe: some conceptual issues. Int J Soc Welf 17(1):84–92
Oates WE (1972) Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich
Oates WE (2008) On the theory and practice of fiscal decentralization. In: Auerbach AJ, Shaviro DN (eds) Institutional foundations of public finance: economic and legal perspectives. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp 166–192
ONS (2013) Office for national statistics: language in England and Wales 2011. Accessed 11 June, 2022. Available at https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/culturalidentity/language/articles/languageinenglandandwales/2013-03-04
O’Reilly M, Parker N (2013) Unsatisfactory saturation: a critical exploration of the notion of saturated sample sizes in qualitative research. Qual Res 13(2):190–197
Pearce D, Groom B, Hepburn C, Koundouri P (2003) Valuing the future. World Econ 4(2):121–141
Peckham S, Exworthy M, Powell M, Greener I (2005) Decentralisation as an organisational model for health care in England. NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R&D Programme, London
Prescriber (2007) Change for life. J Prescribing Med Manag 18(12):55–55
Purdy S (2010) Avoiding hospital admissions. What does the research evidence say? King’s Fund, London
Rechel B, Doyle Y, Grundy E, McKee M (2009) How can health systems respond to population ageing? Policy brief 10. World Health Organization, Copenhagen
Rosa EM, Tudge J (2013) Urie Bronfenbrenner’s theory of human development: its evolution from ecology to bioecology. J Fam Theory Rev 5(4):243–258
Saltman R, Busse R, Figueras J (2007) Decentralization in health care: strategies and outcomes. McGraw-Hill Education (UK), Maidenhead
Scharpf FW (1997) Games real actors play: actor-centered institutionalism in policy research. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado
Self-management UK (2016) What is self-management? Accessed 19 June, 2022. Available at http://selfmanagementuk.org/what-is-self-management
Shortall S, Warner ME (2010) Social inclusion or market competitiveness? A comparison of rural development policies in the European Union and the United States. Soc Policy Adm 44(5):575–597
Singh D (2005) Transforming chronic care: evidence about improving care for people with long-term conditions. Accessed 17 June, 2022. Available at http://www.download.bham.ac.uk/hsmc/pdf/transforming_chronic_care.pdf
Smullen A (2015) Not centralisation but decentralised integration through Australia’s national mental health policy. Aust J Public Adm 75(3):280–290
The Kings Fund (2022) The NHS budget and how it has changed. Accessed 17 May, 2022. Available at https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/projects/nhs-in-a-nutshell/nhs-budget
The NHS Confederation (2012) Investing in emotional and psychological wellbeing for patients with long-term conditions: a guide to service design and productivity improvement for commissioners, clinicians and managers in primary care, secondary care and mental health. The NHS Confederation, London
Thomson GE, Mitchell F, Williams M (2006) Examining the health disparities research plan of the National Institutes of Health: unfinished business. National Academies Press, Washington
HM Treasury (2022) New efficiency drive to cut £5.5 billion of government waste. Accessed 17 May, 2022. Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-efficiency-drive-to-cut-55-billion-of-government-waste
Tudge JR, Mokrova I, Hatfield BE, Karnik RB (2009) Uses and misuses of Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological theory of human development. J Fam Theory Rev 1(4):198–210
Tudge JR, Payir A, Merçon-Vargas E, Cao H, Liang Y, Li J, O’Brien L (2016) Still misused after all these years? A re-evaluation of the uses of Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological theory of human development. J Fam Theory Rev 8(4):427–445
Vrangbæk K (2007a) Key factors in assessing decentralization and recentralization in health systems. In: Saltman RB, Bankauskaite V, Vrangbæk K (eds) Decentralization in health care. Open University Press, Berkshire, pp 63–76
Vrangbæk K (2007b) Towards a typology for decentralization in health care. In: Saltman RB, Bankauskaite V, Vrangbæk K (eds) Decentralization in health care. Open University Press, Berkshire, pp 44–62
Wenzel L, Robertson R (2019) What is commissioning and how is it changing? Accessed 17 May, 2022. Available at https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/what-commissioning-and-how-it-changing
Young IM (2001) Equality of whom? Social groups and judgments of injustice. J Polit Philos 9(1):1–18
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank Diabetes UK with their support in this research. The author would also like to that Anna Heyman, the research assistant who diligently coordinated the results of this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Readers should note that the author is currently a trustee (volunteer) at X-PERT Health, one of the national providers of diabetes structured education.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shaw, A. (2023). Assessing Health Inequalities of Diabetes Care Through the Application of the Bio-ecology Theory. In: Çetin, E., Özen, H. (eds) Healthcare Policy, Innovation and Digitalization. Accounting, Finance, Sustainability, Governance & Fraud: Theory and Application. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5964-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5964-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-5963-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-5964-8
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)