Zusammenfassung
Das Ziel dieses abschließenden Kapitels ist es, anhand von Beispielen zu erlaeutern, auf welche verschiedenen Weisen fotografische Forschung zur Veröffentlichung präsentiert werden kann. Der Fokus liegt zunächst auf der Verwendung von mehreren Fotografien mit Vignetten zur Erklärung sozialer Phänomene und zweitens auf Foto-Narrative, eine Reihe von Fotografien, die zusammen eine komplexe soziale Situation beschreiben. Diese Ansätze werden dann im Kontext von Konferenzpräsentationen und dem Schreiben von Forschungsarbeiten zur Veröffentlichung gezeigt. Dieses Kapitel erlaeutert auch das manchmal schwierig zu navigierende Problem des Urheberrechts. Dies ist besonders relevant, wenn Forscher bereits veröffentlichte Fotos von sich selbst oder von anderen wiederverwenden möchten.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Literatur
Australian Copyright Council. (2014a). Photographers & copyright: Information sheet G011v18. Zugegriffen: http://www.copyright.org.au/acc_prod/AsiCommon/Controls/BSA/Downloader.aspx?iDocumentStorageKey=960d14ff-e42f-42a7-9789-c92e38a1a4c3&iFileTypeCode=PDF&iFileName=Photographers%20&%20Copyright.
Australian Copyright Council. (2014b). Moral rights: Information sheet g043v14. Zugegriffen: http://www.copyright.org.au/acc_prod/AsiCommon/Controls/BSA/Downloader.aspx?iDocumentStorageKey=77905fc6-ac1d-43f9-9ac3-e7179aefd46b&iFileTypeCode=PDF&iFileName=Moral%20Rights.
Australian Law Reform Commission. (2013). Copyright and the digital economy. Zugegriffen: https://www.alrc.gov.au/sites/default/files/pdfs/publications/final_report_alrc_122_2nd_december_2013_.pdf.
Baetens, J. (1995). John Berger and Jean Mohr: From photography to photo narrative. History of Photography, 19(4), 283–285.
Baetens, J., & Ribière, M. (1995). The Calaceite conference on photo narrative. History of Photography, 19(4), 314–315.
Banks, M., & Zeitlyn, D. (2015). Visual methods in social research. Sage Publications.
Bell, S. E. (2002). Photo images: Jo Spence’s narratives of living with illness. Health, 6(1), 5–30.
Cantatore, F., & Johnston, J. (2016). Moral rights: Exploring the myths, meanings and misunderstandings in Australian copyright law. Deakin Law Review, 21(1), 71.
Clergue, L. (1980). Lucien Clergue: langage des sables. AGEP.
Copyright Amendment (Moral Rights) Act (Cth). (2000). Zugegriffen: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2004A00752#
Creative Commons. (2017a). Learn about CC. Zugegriffen: http://creativecommons.org.au/learn/.
Creative Commons. (2017b). About the licences. Zugegriffen: http://creativecommons.org.au/learn/licences/.
Deazley, R. (2007). Copyright‘s public domain. In C. MacQueen & H. Waelde (Hrsg.), Intellectual property: The many faces of the public domain. (S. 21–34). Edward Elgar.
Erickson, K., Heald, P., Homberg, F., Kretschmer, M., & Mendis, D. (2015). Copyright and the value of the public domain: An empirical assessment. Intellectual Property Office Research Paper, 2015 Forthcoming; University of Illinois College of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 15–16. SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2571220.
Golden-Biddle, K., & Locke, K. (2007). Composing qualitative research. Sage Publications.
Hall, J. A., Coats, E. J., & LeBeau, L. S. (2005). Nonverbal behavior and the vertical dimension of social relations: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 898–924.
Harington, R. (2017). The value of copyright: A publisher’s perspective. Zugegriffen: https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2017/02/07/the-value-of-copyright-a-publishers-perspective/.
Holm, G. (2014). Photography as a Research Method. In P. Levy (Hrsg.), The Oxford handbook of qualitative research (S. 380–402). Oxford University Press.
Hugenholtz, P. B. (2013). Law and technology fair use in Europe. Communications of the ACM, 56(5), 26–28.
Intellectual Property Office. (2014). Exceptions to copyright. Zugegriffen: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright.
Jacobs, S. (2016). The effect of the 1886 Berne convention on the US copyright system’s treatment of moral rights and copyright term, and where that leaves us today. Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review, 23(1), 169–190.
Jessop, M. (2008). Digital visualization as a scholarly activity. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 23(3), 281–293.
Joanou, J. P. (2009). The bad and the ugly: Ethical concerns in participatory photographic methods with children living and working on the streets of Lima. Peru. Visual Studies, 24(3), 214–223.
Katsarova, I. (2015). The challenges of copyright in the EU. EPRS|European Parliamentary Research Service, 10, 1–12.
Kuhlen, R. (2013). Copyright issues in the European Union: towards a science-and education-friendly copyright. Zugegriffen: https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/27083.
Langmann, S. (2014). NGOs and poverty reduction in Tamil Nadu: Exploring a knowledge-sharing for development framework. Curtin University.
Langmann, S., & Pick, D. (2014). Dignity and ethics in research photography. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 17(6), 709–721.
Lessig, L. (2006). Re-crafting a public domain. Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, 18(3), 56–83.
Margoni, T. (2016). The harmonisation of EU copyright law: the originality standard. In Global governance of intellectual property in the 21st century (S. 85–105). Springer International Publishing.
Markham, A. (2012). Fair use of images in scholarly publishing. Zugegriffen: http://annettemarkham.com/2012/02/fair-use-of-images-in-scholarly-publishing/.
Morris, R. G. (1992). Use of copyrighted images in academic scholarship and creative work: The problems of new technologies and a proposed scholarly license. IDEA, 33, 123.
Newbury, D. (2011). Making arguments with images: Visual scholarship and academic publishing. In E. Margolis & Luc Pauwels (Hrsg.), The sage handbook of visual research methods. Sage Publications.
Olsen, S. W. (2017). Single frame narrative photography: An essay. Zugegriffen: https://www.lensculture.com/articles/w-scott-olsen-single-frame-narrative-photography-an-essay.
Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Sage Publications.
Rose, G. (2007). Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials (2. Aufl.). Sage Publications.
Rowe, J. (2011). Legal issues of using images in research. In E. Margolis & Luc Pauwels (Hrsg.), The Sage handbook of visual methods (S. 707–722). Sage Publications.
Rowe, W. (1995). The wordless doctoral dissertation: Photography as scholarship. The Cal Poly Pomona Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 8, 21–30.
Rowley-Jolivet, E. (2002). Visual discourse in scientific conference papers A genre-based study. English for Specific Purposes, 21(1), 19–40.
Scott, G. (2016). The single image narrative: Sometimes it chooses you. United Nations of Photography.
Soutter, L. (2000). Dial „P“ for panties: Narrative photography in the 1990s. Afterimage, 27(4), 9–12.
Speidel, K. (2013). Can a single still picture tell a story? Definitions of narrative and the alleged problem of time with single still pictures. Diegesis, 2(1), 1–22.
Stim, R. (2010). Welcome to the public domain. Standford University Libraries. Zugegriffen: http://fairuse.stanford.edu/overview/public-domain/welcome/.
Taubman, A. S. (2007). The public domain and international intellectual property law treaties. In C. Waelde & H. L. MacQueen (Hrsg.), Intellectual property: The many faces of the public domain (S. 53–85). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Tiemens, R. K. (1970). Some relationships of camera angle to communicator credibility. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 14(4), 483–490.
U.S. Constitution (Vol. 17 USC). Zugegriffen: https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCODE-2010-title17
Warren, S. (2005). Photography and voice in critical qualitative management research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18(6), 861–882.
Wiles, R., Clark, A., & Prosser, J. (2011). Visual research ethics at the crossroads. In J. Hughes (Hrsg.), Sage visual methods volume I: Principles, issues, debates and controversies in visual research. Sage Publications.
Winton, A. (2016). Using photography as a creative, Collaborative Research Tool. The Qualitative Report, 21(2), 428.
Zhou, Y. (2014). Moral Rights in the Information Society. Beijing Law Review, 5, 107–113.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Langmann, S., Pick, D. (2023). Veröffentlichung und Präsentation von Forschungsfotografien. In: Fotografie als Methode in der Sozialforschung. Springer VS, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5888-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5888-7_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-5887-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-5888-7
eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)