Abstract
In 2016, Ida Tin, the founder of Clue, a digital Danish menstruation application coined the term “FemTech,” a portmanteau of “feminine” and “technologies” that refers to the wide range of products designed with women’s digital health in mind. Prior to this, investments in feminine technologies totalled a mere 100 million (USD) worldwide (FemTech Analytics). In 2019, however, just three years after the phrase entered our vocabulary, FemTech was valued at 18.75B. FemTech now includes both hardware, such as wearable, ingestible, and embeddable devices, along with software; for example, digital applications and web-based platforms. These products are designed to reach a range of women’s health needs, including menstruation and ovulation tracking, diet and fitness, sexual health, pleasure, and wellness, contraception and maternal health, and, less frequently, tools for conditions such as endometriosis, polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), menopause, and mental health. The industry is predicted to be worth 60 billion dollars (USD) by 2027 (Emergen, 2020). Yet while FemTech is a rapidly evolving and expanding global market, there remains very little research into the relationship between FemTech and health inequalities that arise as a result of social factors such as race, class, sexuality and ability, not to mention the vast geographical differences between dominant and emerging markets. In the academic literature, for example, little critique is given to how these forms of marginalization intersect but are overlooked in products that largely assume a white, heterosexual, affluent, childbearing, and able-bodied user.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
“Postdigital” in this sense is an understanding that the digital is no longer a separate domain of culture but in every sphere of social, cultural, and political life. It delineates a context where the digital is invisible and naturalized in how we think, act, know, and feel.
- 3.
Quantified self refers both to the cultural phenomenon of self-tracking with technology and to a community of users and makers of self-tracking tools who share an interest in self-knowledge through numbers. Quantified Self practices overlap with other trends that incorporate technology and data into daily life, often with the goal of improving physical, mental, and/or even social performance.
- 4.
“Womxn” is used often in intersectional feminism as an alternative spelling to woman. It is done so in objection of assumed sexism and/or gender hierarchies that can be reproduces vis a vis the sequencing of m-a-n and m-e-n. It is also used to be more inclusive of trans and nonbinary women.
References
Atanasoski, N., & Vora, K. (2019). Surrogate humanity: Race, robots, and the politics of technological futures. Duke.
Census. (2021). National life tables – life expectancy in the UK: 2018 to 2020. Office for National Statistics. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/lifeexpectancies/bulletins/nationallifetablesunitedkingdom/2018to2020
Corbin, B. (2020). Digital micro-aggressions and discrimination: FemTech and the ‘Othering’ of women. Nova Law Review, 44. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3630435
Criado Perez, C. (2019). Invisible women: Exposing data bias in a world designed for men. Harry N. Abrams.
Das, R., & S. Das. (2021). FemTech Collective Market Report. 29–38.
Díaz, S. (2020). In N. Naples (Ed.), Science, technology and gender. Companion to women’s and gender studies. Wiley Blakwell.
Dolezal, L., & V. Oikkonen. (2021). Introduction: Self-tracking, embodied differences, and intersectionality. Catalyst: Feminism, theory, technoscience.
Esmonde, K. (2020). ‘There’s only so much data you can handle in your life’: Accomodating and resisting self-surveillance in women’s running and fitness practices. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 12(1), 76–90. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1617188
FemTech Analytics. (2021). FemTech Industry Landscape Overview. https://www.femtech.health/femtech-overview-q4-2021
FemTech Collective Market Report. (2021). www.femtechcollective.com
Femtech Global Market Map. (2020). Fermata Inc. https://sg.hellofermata.com/blogs/blog/femtech-global-market-map-released-by-fermata-inc-nov-2020
Haraway, D. (2013). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective 1. In M. Wyer et al. (Eds.), Women, science, and technology: A reader in feminist science studies (3rd ed., pp. 456–472). Routledge.
Kearney, R. (2014, August 30). Losing our touch. New York Times. https://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/08/30/losing-our-touch/
Lupton, D. (2017). The diverse domains of quantified selves: Self-tracking modes and dataveillance. Economy and Science, 45(1), 101–122. https://www.dhi.ac.uk/san/waysofbeing/data/data-crone-lupton-2016e.pdf
McRobbie, A. (2015). Notes on the perfect competitive femininity in neoliberal times. Australian Feminist Studies, 30(83), 3–20.
Pedersen, I., & Illiadis, A. (2020). Embodied computing: Wearables, Implantables, Embeddables, Ingestibles. MIT Press.
Serrano, J. (2007). Whipping girl: A Transsexual Woman on Sexism and the Scapegoating of Femininity. Seal Press.
Shah, K., & Epker, E. (2021). Investment and fundraising in the Femtech industry. FemTech Collective Market Report, 56–67.
Singer, N. (2021, January 13). Flo settles F.T.C. charges of misleading users on privacy. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/13/business/flo-privacy.html
Takeshita, C. (2013). ‘Keep life simple’: Body/technology relationships in racialized global contexts. In M. Wyer et al. (Eds.), Women, science, and technology: A reader in feminist science studies (3rd ed., pp. 242–261). Routledge.
Thomas, J. (2021). FemTech has a key part to play in women’s health strategy. Digital Health London. https://www.digitalhealth.net/2021/06/femtech-has-a-key-part-to-play-in-womens-health-strategy/
Webb, J. (2020). The quantified (female) self examining the conceptualisation of female health, selfhood and embodiment in Fitbit strategic communication campaigns. In B. Cammaerts, N. Anstead, & R. Stupart (Eds.), Media@LSE working paper series (pp. 1–53). LSE.
Weber, J. (2013). From science and technology to Feminist Technoscience. In M. Wyer et al. (Eds.), Women, science, and technology: A reader in feminist science studies (3rd ed., pp. 543–556). Routledge.
Wiese, J. (2021). Femtech in emerging markets. In FemTech Collective Market Report, pp. 39–54.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Balfour, L. (2023). Introduction: Who Is FemTech For?. In: Balfour, L.A. (eds) FemTech. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5605-0_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5605-0_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-5604-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-5605-0
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)