Abstract
The previous chapters introduce the historical changes in China’s natural resource regulatory system, comparing and learning from the regulatory experiences of other countries. In this chapter, we focus on the content of natural resource accounting and pricing. There has been a longstanding debate on whether natural resources have value, and only in recent years has it been accepted that they do, but there is still no widespread consensus on how to measure them, meaning that natural resource asset valuation, accounting, and pricing remain unclear.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Water environmental capacity refers to the maximum load of pollutants in the water body to meet the requirements of water environmental quality, and is also known as the water body load or pollution capacity.
- 2.
The 18 indicators in the Huzhou water resource balance sheet are per capita water resources, unit area water resources, per capita water supply, runoff coefficient, drought index, COD, ammonia nitrogen, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, potassium permanganate, population density, daily comprehensive water consumption per capita, irrigation area per capita, GDP per capita, urban water demand ratio, water consumption per 10,000 yuan of GDP, water resource development utilization rate, and industrial water reuse utilization rate.
References
Feng ZM, Yang YZ, Chen Y. National balance sheets and implications for natural resource balance sheet. Resources Science, 2015, 37(9): 1685–1691.
Banerjee O, Cicowiez M, Horridge M, Vargas R. A conceptual framework for integrated economic–environmental modeling. The Journal of Environment & Development, 2016, 25(3): 276–305.
Dutta D, Vaze J, Kim S, Hughes J, Yang A, Teng J, Lerat J. Development and application of a large scale river system model for National Water Accounting in Australia. Journal of Hydrology, 2017, 547: 124–142.
Dickie I, Neupauer S. Natural capital accounts: nations and organizations. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2019, 8(4): 379–393.
Borucke M, Moore D, Cranston G, Gracey K. Accounting for demand and supply of the biosphere’s regenerative capacity: The National Footprint Accounts’ underlying methodology and framework. Ecological Indicators, 2013, 24: 518–533.
De Groot R, Brander L, Ploeg S, Costanza R, Bernard F, Braat L. Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosystem Services, 2012, 1(1): 50–61.
Pan T, Feng ZM, Liu YJ, Zhang J. Liability accounting method and case in the preparation of natural resources balance. Scientific and Technological Management of Land and Resources, 2019, 36(2): 74–84.
Ewert AW. Natural resource management. The Human Dimension. Routledge, 2021.
Boumans R, Roman J, Altman I. The multiscale integrated model of ecosystem services: Simulating the interactions of coupled human and natural systems. Ecosystem Services, 2015, 12: 30–41.
Smith VK. Nonmarket valuation of environmental resources: an interpretive appraisal. Land Economics, 1993, 69(1): 1–26.
Kovacs KF. Integrating property value and local recreation models to value ecosystem services from regional parks. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2012, 108(2-4): 79–90.
Feng ZM, Yang YZ, Li P. From Natural resources accounting to balance-sheet of natural resources asset compilation. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2014, 29(4): 449–456.
Taye FA, Vedel SE, Jacobsen JB. Accounting for environmental attitude to explain variations in willingness to pay for forest ecosystem services using the new environmental paradigm. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2018, 7(4): 420–440.
Pedro-Monzonís M, Jiménez-Fernández P, Solera A, Jiménez-Gavilán P. The use of AQUATOOL DSS applied to the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting for Water (SEEAW). Journal of Hydrology, 2016, 533: 1–14.
Yang YZ, Chen Y, Song XY. Compilation of a water resource balance sheet for Huzhou City. Resources Science, 2018, 40(5): 908–918.
Pérez-Soba M, Petit S, Jones L, Bertrand N, Briquel V. Land use functions. A Multifunctionality Approach to Assess the Impact of Land Use Changes on Land Use Sustainability. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008: 375–404.
Cabana D, Ryfield F, Crowe TP. Evaluating and communicating cultural ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 2020, 42: 101085.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ding, T., Song, M. (2023). Accounting and Pricing Methods for Natural Resources. In: Natural Resource Regulation in China. Contributions to Public Administration and Public Policy. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5593-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5593-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-5592-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-5593-0
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)