Abstract
Remote participation in higher education courses, especially in technical subjects, is challenging, as there is a lot of practical knowledge to be applied or directly instructed, and it has to happen at the university premises since the labs are set up there. In this study, we allowed three ICT lecturers teaching at the undergraduate level to experiment with telepresence robots, augment the teaching and learning environment, and understand their readiness to adopt this technology. The experiments were documented, and semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants in order to obtain additional details for the experiment documentation. We found that using telepresence robots in labs requires both a well-planned teaching process and appropriate teaching environment settings to overcome technical limitations. As for future studies, there is a need for studies with bigger samples of ICT lecturers to implement these proposed scenarios to understand better the possibilities of effectively using telepresence robots for hybrid teaching in ICT subjects.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ruzzante, S., Labarta, R., Bilton, A.: Adoption of agricultural technology in the developing world: a meta-analysis of the empirical literature. World Dev. 146, 105599 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105599
Iyanna, S., Kaur, P., Ractham, P., Talwar, S., Najmul Islam, A.K.M.: Digital transformation of healthcare sector. What is impeding adoption and continued usage of technology-driven innovations by end-users? J. Bus. Res. 153, 150–161 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.08.007
Hwang, B.-G., Ngo, J., Teo, J.Z.K.: Challenges and strategies for the adoption of smart technologies in the construction industry: the case of Singapore. J. Manag. Eng. 38 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000986
Aldunate, R., Nussbaum, M.: Teacher adoption of technology. Comput. Human Behav. 29, 519–524 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2012.10.017
Abrahams, D.A.: Technology adoption in higher education: a framework for identifying and prioritising issues and barriers to adoption of instructional technology. J. Appl. Res. Higher Educ. 2, 34–49 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1108/17581184201000012
Beno, M.: Work Flexibility, Telepresence in the Office for Remote Workers: A Case Study From Austria. Presented at the (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03014-8_2
He, W., Zhang, Z. (Justin), Li, W.: Information technology solutions, challenges, and suggestions for tackling the COVID-19 pandemic. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 57, 102287 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102287
Wang, M., Pan, C., Ray, P.K.: Technology entrepreneurship in developing countries: role of telepresence robots in healthcare. IEEE Eng. Manag. Rev. 49, 20–26 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2021.3053258
Muratbekova-Touron, M., Leon, E.: “Is there anybody out there?” using a telepresence robot to engage in face time at the office. Inf. Technol. People 36, 48–65 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-01-2021-0080
Tota, P., Tirian, G.O., Chiorean, L., Vaida, M.-F.: Telepresence robot for exploring protected natural areas. In: 2022 IEEE International Conference on Automation, Quality and Testing, Robotics (AQTR), pp. 1–5. IEEE (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/AQTR55203.2022.9801925
Garner, R.L. (ed.): Exploring Digital Technologies for Art-Based Special Education. Routledge (2019). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351067928
Leoste, J., Virkus, S., Talisainen, A.: Higher Education Teachers’ Perceptions About Teaching and Learning Related Qualities of Telepresence Robots. Presented at the (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21065-5_43
Reis, A., Martins, M., Martins, P., Sousa, J., Barroso, J.: Telepresence Robots in the Classroom: The State-of-the-Art and a Proposal for a Telepresence Service for Higher Education. Presented at the (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20954-4_41
Lei, M., Clemente, I.M., Liu, H., Bell, J.: The acceptance of telepresence robots in higher education. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 14, 1025–1042 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-021-00837-y
Chou, H.S., Thong, L.T., Chew, H.S.J., Lau, Y.: Barriers and facilitators of robot-assisted education in higher education: a systematic mixed-studies review. Technol., Knowl. Learn. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-022-09637-3
Ijsselsteijn, W.A.: History of Telepresence (2006). https://doi.org/10.1002/0470022736.ch1
Shen, X., Shirmohammadi, S.: Telepresence. In: Encyclopedia of Multimedia, pp. 849–852. Springer US, Boston, MA (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-78414-4_229
Leoste, J., Virkus, S., Talisainen, A., Tammemäe, K., Kangur, K., Petriashvili, I.: Higher education personnel’s perceptions about telepresence robots. Front Robot AI. 9 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2022.976836
Häfner, P., Wernbacher, T., Pfeiffer, A., Denk, N.: Limits and Benefits of Using Telepresence Robots for Educational Purposes Internet of Things Security View project Mobile-Based Learning and Assessment View project, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/364196728
Kristoffersson, A., Coradeschi, S., Loutfi, A.: A Review of Mobile Robotic Telepresence (2013). https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/902316
Chen, Y., Cao, L., Guo, L., Cheng, J.: Driving is believing: using telepresence robots to access makerspace for teachers in rural areas. Br. J. Edu. Technol. 53, 1956–1975 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13225
Virkus, S., Leoste, J., Marmor, K., Kasuk, T., Talisainen, A.: Telepresence robots from the perspective of psychology and educational sciences. Inf. Learn. Sci. 124, 48–69 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-09-2022-0106
Thompson, P., Chaivisit, S.: Telepresence robots in the classroom. J. Educ. Technol. Syst. 50, 201–214 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395211034778
Perifanou, M., Economides, A.A., Häfner, P., Wernbacher, T.: Mobile telepresence robots in education: strengths, opportunities, weaknesses, and challenges. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), pp. 573–579. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16290-9_52
Velinov, A., Koceski, S., Koceska, N.: A review of the usage of telepresence robots in education. Balk. J. Appl. Math. Inform. 4, 27–40 (2021)
Leoste, J., Kikkas, K., Tammemäe, K., Rebane, M., Laugasson, E., Hakk, K.: Telepresence Robots in Higher Education—The Current State of Research. Presented at the (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12848-6_12
Gallon, L., Abénia, A., Dubergey, F., Negui, M.: Using a Telepresence Robot in an Educational Contex (2019). https://hal-univ-pau.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02410364
Tan, Q., Denojean-Mairet, M., Wang, H., Zhang, X., Pivot, F.C., Treu, R.: Toward a telepresence robot empowered smart lab. Smart Learn. Environ. 6 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-019-0084-3
Pöial, J.: Challenges of Teaching Programming in StackOverflow Era. Presented at the (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68198-2_65
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Meeran, M.T., Leoste, J., Budagov, F., Pöial, J., Marmor, K. (2023). Using Telepresence Robots for Remote Participation in Technical Subjects in Higher Education. In: Dascalu, M., Mealha, Ó., Virkus, S. (eds) Smart Learning Ecosystems as Engines of the Green and Digital Transition. SLERD 2023. Advances in Sustainability Science and Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5540-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5540-4_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-5790-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-5540-4
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)