Skip to main content

Femoral Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Hip Arthroplasty

Abstract

Total hip arthroplasty is one of the most successful surgeries in orthopedic field. Now various designs of hip prosthesis with different biomechanics are available in the market. The right choice of implant is crucial to achieve good outcomes in hip arthroplasty. In this chapter, we will discuss the different designs along with the classification of femoral stems and their biomechanical characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Eftekhar NASS. Long-term results of cemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;225:207–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Schulte KR, et al. The outcome of Charnley total hip arthroplasty with cement after a minimum twenty-year follow-up. The results of one surgeon. JBJS. 1993;75(7):961–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ong A, et al. Early failure of precoated femoral components in primary total hip arthroplasty. JBJS. 2002;84(5):786–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shen G. Femoral stem fixation. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1998;80(5):754–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Collis DK, Mohler CG. Comparison of clinical outcomes in total hip arthroplasty using rough and polished cemented stems with essentially the same geometry. JBJS. 2002;84(4):586–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Howie DW, Middleton RG, Costi K. Loosening of matt and polished cemented femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1998;80(4):573–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Meding JB, et al. A comparison of collared and collarless femoral components in primary cemented total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. J Arthroplast. 1999;14(2):123–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ling RS. The use of a collar and precoating on cemented femoral stems is unnecessary and detrimental. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;285:73–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ayers D, Mann K. The importance of proximal cement filling of the calcar region: a biomechanical justification. J Arthroplast. 2003;18:103–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Star MJ, et al. Suboptimal (thin) distal cement mantle thickness as a contributory factor in total hip arthroplasty femoral component failure: a retrospective radiographic analysis favoring distal stem centralization. J Arthroplast. 1994;9(2):143–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Albrektsson T, et al. Osseointegrated titanium implants: requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand. 1981;52(2):155–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. MacDonald SJ, et al. Proximally versus fully porous-coated femoral stems: a multicenter randomized trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(2):424–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Petis SM, et al. Comparing the long-term results of two uncemented femoral stems for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2015;30(5):781–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Khanuja HS, et al. Cementless femoral fixation in total hip arthroplasty. JBJS. 2011;93(5):500–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Burt CF, et al. A femoral component inserted without cement in total hip arthroplasty. A study of the tri-lock component with an average ten-year duration of follow-up. JBJS. 1998;80(7):952–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Epinette J-A, Manley MT. Uncemented stems in hip replacement-hydroxyapatite or plain porous: does it matter? Based on a prospective study of HA Omnifit stems at 15-years minimum follow-up. Hip Int. 2008;18(2):69–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Biant LC, et al. The anatomically difficult primary total hip replacement: medium-to long-term results using a cementless odular stem. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2008;90(4):430–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim Y-H, Kim J-S, Cho S-H. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a cementless porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis: 10-to 12-year results of prospective andconsecutive series. J Arthroplast. 1999;14(5):538–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Harwin SF, Stern RE, Kulick RG. Primary Bateman-Leinbach bipolar prosthetic replacement of the hip in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly. Orthopedics. 1990;13(10):1131–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mahajan, V., Kantharaju, H., Sharma, M. (2023). Femoral Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty. In: Sharma, M. (eds) Hip Arthroplasty. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5517-6_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5517-6_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-5516-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-5517-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics