Skip to main content

Size Matters: Exploring the Impact of Model Architecture and Dataset Size on Semantic Segmentation of Abdominal Wall Muscles in CT Scans

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Inventive Communication and Computational Technologies (ICICCT 2023)

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) scans are an excellent way of capturing the details of the abdominal muscles. Several abnormalities including hernia, tumour, and neuro-muscular diseases can be identified and estimated by CT scans, including the representation of muscle loss. Radiologists carefully segment and review every CT slice to monitor these abnormalities. This is a meticulous, painstaking, and time-consuming process. This is especially true for the abdomen, which has a lot of variations and complexities in the wall and surrounding tissues. To solve this, we annotated 451 image-mask pairs from DICOM files of the abdominal muscles of size \(512 \times 512\) pixels. In this work, the trade-off between computation cost and image loss is estimated by splitting the imageries into two categories of size: \(128 \times 128\) pixels and \(512 \times 512\) pixels. To sustain the original image size, the authors create a resized version of the base U-Net and train it from scratch. Furthermore, two dataset categories are created to show the data-intensive quality of the models (One double in size compared to the other). To train the system using these datasets, two architectures U-Net and resized U-Net are used which are then compared through the introduction of a new loss function—“complete loss”. The resized U-Net performs better than the standard U-Net by displaying a mean complete loss of 3.52 and 10.79% for the validation and test sets, respectively. The data dependency of models is clearly shown as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T (2015) U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention. Springer, Cham, pp 234–241

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boita J, van Engen RE, Mackenzie A, Tingberg A, Bosmans H, Bolejko A, Zackrisson S, Wallis MG, Ikeda DM, Van Ongeval C, Pijnappel R, VISUAL Group Jansen F, Duijm L, de Bruin H, Andersson I, Behmer C, Taylor K, Kilburn-Toppin F, van Goethem M, Prevos R, Salem N, Pal S (2021) How does image quality affect radiologists’ perceived ability for image interpretation and lesion detection in digital mammography? Eur Radiol 31:5335–5343

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gonzalez RC, Woods RE, Eddins SL (2004) Digital image processing using MATLAB. Pearson Education India

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pal NR, Pal SK (1993) A review on image segmentation techniques. Pattern Recogn 26(9):1277–1294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G (2015) Deep learning. Nature 521(7553):436–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shin HC, Roth HR, Gao M, Lu L, Xu Z, Nogues I, Summers RM (2016) Deep convolutional neural networks for computer-aided detection: CNN architectures, dataset characteristics, and transfer learning. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 35(5):1285–1298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE (2017) Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Commun ACM 60(6):84–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Long J, Shelhamer E, Darrell T (2015) Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 3431–3440

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhou Y, Xie L, Shen W, Wang Y, Fishman EK, Yuille AL (2017) A fixed-point model for pancreas segmentation in abdominal CT scans. In: International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention. Springer, Cham, pp 693–701

    Google Scholar 

  10. Roth HR, Oda H, Hayashi Y, Oda M, Shimizu N, Fujiwara M, Misawa K, Mori K (2017) Hierarchical 3D fully convolutional networks for multi-organ segmentation. arXiv:1704.06382

  11. Chlebus G, Schenk A, Moltz JH, van Ginneken B, Hahn HK, Meine H (2018) Automatic liver tumor segmentation in CT with fully convolutional neural networks and object-based postprocessing. Sci Rep 8(1):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jaeger PF, Kohl SA, Bickelhaupt S, Isensee F, Kuder TA, Schlemmer HP, Maier-Hein KH (2020) Retina U-net: embarrassingly simple exploitation of segmentation supervision for medical object detection. In: Machine learning for health workshop. PMLR, pp 171–183

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yushkevich PA, Piven J, Hazlett HC, Smith RG, Ho S, Gee JC, Gerig G (2006) User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage 31(3):1116–1128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kirkland EJ, Kirkland EJ (2010) Bilinear interpolation. In: Advanced computing in electron microscopy, pp 261–263

    Google Scholar 

  15. Roth HR, Shen C, Oda H, Oda M, Hayashi Y, Misawa K, Mori K (2018) Deep learning and its application to medical image segmentation. Med Imaging Technol 36(2):63–71

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rister B, Yi D, Shivakumar K, Nobashi T, Rubin DL (2020) CT-ORG, a new dataset for multiple organ segmentation in computed tomography. Sci Data 7(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kingma DP, Ba J (2014) Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. arXiv:1412.6980

  18. Sharma N, Aggarwal LM (2010) Automated medical image segmentation techniques. J Med Phys 35(1):3

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper and the research would not have been possible without the help of my exceptional mentor Maniappan R and Curium Life for providing us with the datasets. His valuable suggestions during the planning and development of this research work helped us progress as scheduled.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ankit P. Bisleri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bisleri, A.P., Kumar, A.S., Bhargav, A.A., Varun, S., Kasturi, N. (2023). Size Matters: Exploring the Impact of Model Architecture and Dataset Size on Semantic Segmentation of Abdominal Wall Muscles in CT Scans. In: Ranganathan, G., Papakostas, G.A., Rocha, Á. (eds) Inventive Communication and Computational Technologies. ICICCT 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 757. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5166-6_42

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics