Abstract
The literature on innovation management indicates the rise of the green innovation topic recently, which emphasises how companies adopt and implement advanced friendly technology to achieve environmental sustainability as a part of sustainable development goals. Most of the studies were conducted in the context of large manufacturing companies. Little attention has been paid to the setting of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) as the backbone of the economy in many countries (e.g. Takalo et al. 2021). In Indonesia, the contribution of SMEs is significant for absorbing 97% of the total workforce and generating 60.4% of total investment, according to the Coordinating Ministry for the Economy in 2021. Our study uses institutional theory as a point of reference. It aims to understand various factors that drive organisations to seek legitimacy or social fitness when they want to adopt or make a decision (Dimaggio and Powell, 1983; Oliver, 1991), which in this context is adopting green innovation. The study deployed qualitative multiple case studies by conducting in-depth interviews for 11 SMEs (14 participants) in batik sectors in Indonesia who were already implementing green innovation (from only green, a combination of brown and green and green until brown to green). SMEs in the batik sector were selected as a sample because batik is well known as traditional clothing from Java and is considered the original cultural heritage of Indonesia by UNESCO (Wang, 2019). Batik faces fierce competition due to mass and fast production from larger companies and the issue of chemical dyes and synthetic colours (Raya et al., 2021). Validity in this research was supported by the triangulation method combined with member checking. Data were analysed using a content analysis method referring to the procedure by Miles et al. (2014) to answer the research question. The current study shows the pressure of external forces, namely regulatory/coercive force, cognitive pressure and normative pressure, are the motives for organisational decisions and actions to adopt green innovation. Our findings substantiate and broaden the institutional theory (Bruton et al. 2010; Rui and Lu, 2020) by providing empirical evidence regarding SMEs in the batik sector in Indonesia. Limitations of the study are highlighted, which align with suggestions for future research avenues. Potential practical implications are also discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abbas J, Sağsan M (2019) Impact of knowledge management practices on green innovation and corporate sustainable development: a structural analysis. J Clean Prod 229:611–620
Abdelzaher DM, Abdelzaher A (2015) Beyond environmental regulations: exploring the potential of ‘“Eco-Islam”’ in boosting environmental ethics within SMEs in Arab markets. J Bus Ethics 145:357–371
Aboelmaged M, Hashem G (2019) Absorptive capacity and green innovation adoption in SMEs: the mediating effects of sustainable organisational capabilities. J Clean Prod 220:853–863
Aguilera-Caracuel J, Ortiz-de-Mandojana N (2013) Green innovation and financial performance: an institutional approach. Organ Environ 26(4):365–385
Albort-Morant G, Leal-Millán A, Cepeda-Carrión G (2016) The antecedents of green innovation performance: a model of learning and capabilities. J Bus Res 69(11):4912–4917
Arfi WB, Hikkerova L, Sahut JM (2018) External knowledge sources, green innovation and performance. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 129(January):210–220
Boohene R, Gyimah RA, Osei MB (2020) Social capital and SME performance: the moderating role of emotional intelligence. J Entrep Emerg Econ 12(1):79–99
Bruton GD, Ahlstrom D, Li HL (2010) Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: where are we now and where do we need to move in the future? Entrep: Theory Pract 34(3):421–440
Capasso M, Hansen T, Heiberg J, Klitkou A, Steen M (2019) Green growth–a synthesis of scientific findings. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 146(June):390–402
Chekima B, Azizi S, Syed W, Wafa K, Igau OA, Chekima S, Sondoh SL (2015) Examining green consumerism motivational drivers: does premium price and demographics mattern to green purchasing? J Clean Prod 112(4):3436–3450
Chen YS (2008) The driver of green innovation and green image-green core competence. J Bus Ethics 81(3):531–543
Cheng CCJ (2020) Sustainability orientation, green supplier involvement, and green innovation performance: evidence from diversifying green entrants. J Bus Ethics 161(2):393–414
CNN Indonesia (2022) https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20220613155729-293-808397/freeport-indonesia-raih-penghargaan-sustainable-business-awards. Accessed 4 Dec 2022
Creswell JW, Poth CN (2018) Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches, vol 1. Sage Publications
Cuerva MC, Triguero-Cano Á, Córcoles D (2014) Drivers of green and non-green innovation: empirical evidence in Low-Tech SMEs. J Clean Prod 68:104–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.049
Dimaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Sociol Rev 48(2):147–160
Du X, Jian W, Zeng Q (2014) Corporate environmental responsibility in polluting industries: does religion matter? J Bus Ethics 124:485–507
Ebrahimi P, Mirbargkar SM (2017) Green entrepreneurship and green innovation for SME development in market turbulence. Eurasian Bus Rev 7(2):203–228
El-Kassar A, Singh SK (2019) Green innovation and organizational performance: the influence of big data and the moderating role of management commitment and HR practices. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 144(July):483–498
Elkington J (1998) Cannibals with forks. Capstone Publishing
Firmansyah A (2020) The study of soga brown colour visual digitization from classical batik of yogyakarta. In: IOP conference series: materials science and engineering, vol 924(1), pp 1–6
Gleim MR, Smith JS, Andrews D, Cronin JJ (2013) Against the green: a multi-method examination of the barriers to green consumption. J Retail 89(1):44–61
Guoyou Q, Saixing Z, Chiming T, Haitao Y, Hailiang Z (2013) Stakeholders’ influences on corporate green innovation strategy: a case study of manufacturing firms in China. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 20(December):1–14
Horbach J, Rammer C, Rennings K (2012) Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact-the role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull. Ecol Econ 78:112–122
Huang XX, Hu ZP, Liu CS, Yu DJ, Yu LF (2016) The relationships between regulatory and customer pressure, green organizational responses, and green innovation performance. J Clean Prod 112:3423–3433
Indrayani L, Triwiswara M, Evtriyandani (2020) Prinsip efisiensi energi untuk mewujudkan industri batik yang berkelanjutan (sustainable industry). In: Prosiding seminar nasional industri kerajinan dan batik, pp 1–10
Journeault M (2016) The Integrated Scorecard in support of corporate sustainability strategies. J Environ Manage 182:214–229
Jun W, Ali W, Bhutto MY, Hussain H, Khan NA (2021) Examining the determinants of green innovation adoption in SMEs: a PLS-SEM approach. Eur J Innov Manag 24(1):67–87
Kostova T (1997) Country institutional profiles: concept and measurement. Acad Manag Proc 1:180–184
Kusumawati N, Rahmadyanti E, Sianita MM (2021) Batik became two sides of blade for the sustainable development in Indonesia. In Green chemistry and water remediation: research and applications. Elsevier Inc.
Levi PA, Hunga AIR, Sidabalok H (2021) Reviewing batik with natural coloring based on the clean production theory with an ecofeminist perspective (Case Study: Putri Kawung Batik Community in Klaten). Salasika: Indones J Gend Women Child Soc Incl Stud 4(1):1–12
Li D, Zheng M, Cao C, Chen X, Ren S, Huang M (2017) The impact of legitimacy pressure and corporate profitability on green innovation: evidence from China top 100. J Clean Prod 141:41–49
Liu F, Lai K, Cai W (2021) Responsible production for sustainability: concept analysis and bibliometric review. Sustainability 13:1–27
Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldana J (2014) Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. Sage Publications
Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The knowledge-creating company. Oxford University Press
Oliver C (1991) Strategic responses to institutional processes. Acad Manag Rev 16(1):145–179
Peng H, Shen N, Ying H, Wang Q (2021) Can environmental regulation directly promote green innovation behavior ?—based on situation of industrial agglomeration. J Clean Prod 314(June):128044
Qi G, Jia Y, Zou H (2021) Is institutional pressure the mother of green innovation? Examining the moderating effect of absorptive capacity. J Clean Prod 278:123957
Raya AB, Andiani R, Siregar AP, Prasada IY, Indana F, Simbolon TGY, Kinasih AT, Nugroho AD (2021) Challenges, open innovation, and engagement theory at craft SMEs: evidence from Indonesian batik. J Open Innov: Technol Mark Complex 7(121):1–24
Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of innovations. Free Press
Ruef M, Scott WR (1998) A multidimensional model of organizational legitimacy: hospital survival in changing institutional environments. Adm Sci Q 43(4):877–904
Rui Z, Lu Y (2020) Stakeholder pressure, corporate environmental ethics and green innovation. Asian J Technol Innov 29(1):70–86
Schweitzer F, Meng Y (2022) How collaborating with NGOs makes green innovations more desirable. Bus. Soc., 1–38
Singh SK, Chen J, Giudice MD, El-Kassar A (2019) Environmental ethics, environmental performance, and competitive advantage: role of environmental training. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 146(May):203–211
Takalo SK, Tooranloo HS, Parizi ZS (2021) Green innovation: a systematic literature review. J Clean Prod 279:122474
Ullah R, Ahmad H, Rehman FU, Fawad A (2021) Green innovation and Sustainable Development Goals in SMEs: the moderating role of government incentives. J Econ Adm Sci (a-head-of-print)
Wang CY (2019) Building a network for preserving intangible cultural heritage through education: a study of Indonesian batik. Int J Art Des Educ 38(2):398–415
Widjojo H, Gunawan S (2020) Indigenous tradition: an overlooked encompassing-factor in social entrepreneurship. J Soc Entrep 11(1):88–110
Yin RK (2018) Case study research and applications: design and methods. Sage
Zhang J, Liang G, Feng T, Yuan C, Jiang W (2019) Green innovation to respond to environmental regulation: how external knowledge adoption and green absorptive capacity matter? Bus Strateg Environ 29(1):39–53
Zhang Y, Sun J, Yang Z, Wang Y (2020) Critical success factors of green innovation: technology, organization and environment readiness. J Clean Prod 264:121701
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kusuma, G.H., Indarti, N., Manik, H.F.G.G. (2023). Underlying Factors of Green Innovation Adoption Among Indonesian Batik Enterprises. In: Rafiki, A., Dana, LP., Nasution, M.D.T.P. (eds) Open Innovation in Small Business. Contributions to Environmental Sciences & Innovative Business Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5142-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5142-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-5141-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-5142-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)