Abstract
For planned development in all walks of life, be it science and technology or economy or education or any other sub-system of a larger society, it is essential to keep a tab and constantly watch whether we are moving as per the plan or not. If it is going on properly and moving towards achieving the set goals, it is always satisfying and motivating and energises us to perform much better. But if it is not so, and instead of going ahead, it is going in a reverse direction or in an awkward direction, we need to correct them at the right time so that the wheel of progress and development may be put on the right track. Monitoring, supervising, and inspecting are the key concepts and actions which help us do the above tasks thereby assisting in the attainment of set goals and objectives. All these three terms, i.e. monitoring, supervising, and inspecting have the same purpose but are done with little varied approaches and act as the heart and soul of a healthy system of functioning of an organisation. This chapter deals with these processes in depth with regard to teacher education and school education. It explores the definitions of these terms and discusses the nuances of monitoring, supervision, and inspection. While discussing, the chapter focuses on these aspects and assessment in teacher education and school education separately highlighting all aspects and stakeholders in the field of school education and teacher education. The chapter also puts light on the data management system and emphasises that the present-day education enterprise must have an efficient system of collecting, storing, retrieving, analysing, and interpreting data. This contributes to validating the realisation of objectives of the institution and helps understand what has been achieved, to what extent achieved, lacunae if any, and possible steps to be taken to potentiate the system.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Aitken, A., Webber, C., Lupart, J., Scott, S., & Runté, R. (2011). Assessment in Alberta: Six areas of concern. The Educational Form, 75, 192–209.
Chi-kin Lee, J., Ding, D., & Song, H. (2008). School supervision and evaluation in China: The Shanghai perspective. Quality Assurance in Education, 16(2), 148–163. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880810868439
National Council of Educational Research and Training. (1975). The curriculum for the ten-year school: A framework.
National Council of Educational Research and Training. (1988). National curriculum for elementary and secondary education: A framework.
National Council of Educational Research and Training. (2000). National curriculum framework for school education.
National Council of Educational Research and Training. (2005). National curriculum framework 2005.
National Council for Teacher Education. (1998). Curriculum framework for quality teacher education.
National Council for Teacher Education. (2009). National curriculum framework for teacher education: Towards a humane and professional teacher.
Nwokafor, J. N., et al. (1987). Educational administration and supervision. Heinemann Educational Book (Nig) Ltd.
Wiles, K. (1954). Supervision for better schools. Prentice Hall Inc.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bhaduri, I. (2023). Monitoring and Supervising Teacher Education and School Education. In: Ahmad, J., Masih, A. (eds) Teaching and Teacher Education in India. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4985-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4985-4_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-4984-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-4985-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)