Skip to main content

Liberal Food, Liberal Consumers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Health Without Bodies

Part of the book series: Health, Technology and Society ((HTE))

Abstract

In this chapter I analyse the making of a European Regulation for health claims between 2003 and 2006, and how a juridical-political commitment to the regulation of information affects how food and bodies can or cannot enter politics. Food itself, as a composite entity, is excluded from the regulation of health claims, as these claims are regulated with respect to individual food components, ingredients, and nutrients. Food becomes information’s constitutive outside. Next, we look at information’s addressee: the consumer. The consumer is a remarkable kind of figure and a cornerstone of the liberal market economy. It is here that we discern something very peculiar about health claims: they assume situations of rational and informed choice while referring to the constitutive outside of those very situations: food as a biochemical complex on the one hand, and the body as a complex of often unpredictable metabolic processes on the other hand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    With the exception of Novel Foods as foods that are new to the EU market. These are under a different EU legislation which includes the characterization and safety of the food in question.

  2. 2.

    Proposal 424 and reports from this ordinary legislative procedure (from the Commission, Parliament, the Council and the Economic and Social Committee) are available on the website of the Parliament’s Legislative Observatory. The code of this procedure file is 2003/0165 (COD). Weblink: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/ficheprocedure.do?id=23510. This enables one to track the development of the decisional procedure and the opinions, comments, and amendments of the relevant actors and institutions involved (last verified on December 22, 2022).

  3. 3.

    ERNA is the European Responsible Nutrition Alliance, an international federation of food and food supplement industries.

  4. 4.

    Interview, 14/03/14.

  5. 5.

    Yet it turned up again in 2020, in a report evaluating the Claims Regulation (European Commission, 2020). The report stresses the need to establish nutrient profiles. In 2022, 15 years after the NHCR entered into force in 2007, EFSA released a first opinion on the criteria that could be taken into account when setting nutrient profiles (EFSA, 2022). It is an advisory document, the implementation of which is at the discretion of the European Commission.

  6. 6.

    Barry (2013) theorizes information as an interplay between transparency and concealment. He analyses a series of knowledge controversies concerning the construction of the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline. Barry documents how this construction became a political experiment in transparency about the pipeline in terms of information. Information, however, is never readily available to take, but it must be produced. Information, as Barry shows, becomes a stake in a political climate with transparency among its core values. Rather than simply bringing everything to light, practices and controversies related to transparency revolve around which information is valuable and which information is not. Barry takes the term constitutive outside from Judith Butler.

  7. 7.

    Proposals to answer all these questions about nutrient profiles have been proposed by, no surprise, ILSI Europe (Tetens et al., 2007) and the Nestlé food company (Nestlé, 2009). See also Verhagen and van den Berg (2008) and the proposal by EFSA (2022).

  8. 8.

    The figure of the consumer reflects this wavering between market and consumer protection, and legal scholars do not necessarily agree on how to interpret the evolution of legislation and case law that address the profile of consumers. While some say that a trend towards more protection and intervention is discernible, accompanied by the image of a more vulnerable consumer, others say that what is protected is not the (vulnerable) consumer as such, but the quality and quantity of information allowing consumers to make choices—with the aim of empowering consumers rather than paternalizing them. Either way, information is considered as objective and factual.

  9. 9.

    Some forms of accreditation, through third parties, are themselves subject to market dynamics and competition. See Laurent and Mallard (2020).

  10. 10.

    See: European Commission (2006), recital 8, p. 2.

  11. 11.

    Personal Interview with the Director of a Brussels-based agency for consultancy on regulatory matters (March 2014).

  12. 12.

    https://cosmeticseurope.eu/files/4016/0015/2480/Guidelines_for_Cosmetic_Product_Claim_Substantiation.pdf

References

  • Barry, A. (2013). Material Politics: Disputes Along the Pipeline. Wiley-Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Caliskan, K., & Callon, M. (2009). Economization, Part 1: Shifting Attention from the Economy Towards Processes of Economization. Economy and Society, 38(3), 369–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caliskan, K., & Callon, M. (2010). Economization, Part 2: A Research Programme for the Study of Markets. Economy and Society, 39(1), 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M., & Muniesa, F. (2005). Economic Markets as Calculative Collective Devices. Organization Studies, 26(8), 1229–1250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M., Méadel, C., & Rabeharisoa, V. (2002). The Economy of Qualities. Economy and Society, 31(2), 194–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochoy, F., Deville, J., & McFall, L. (Eds.). (2017). Markets and the Art of Attachment. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edinger, W. H. (2016). Promoting Educated Consumer Choices. Has EU Food Information Legislation Finally Matured? Journal of Consumer Policy, 39, 9–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EFSA. (2022). Scientific Advice Related to Nutrient Profiling Fort He Development of Harmonized Mandatory Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling and the Setting of Nutrient Profiles for Restricting Nutrition and Health Claims on Foods. EFSA Journal, 20(4), 7259.

    Google Scholar 

  • ERNA. (2011). Nutrition and Health Claims in the EU. A Review of the Consequences of Implementation. ERNA (European Responsible Nutrition Alliance).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2003). Proposal for Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Nutrition and Health Claims Made on Foods. COM(2003) 424 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2006). Regulation (EC) No1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods. OJ L 404/9.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2020). Commission Staff Working Document. Evaluation of the Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 on Nutrition and Health Claims Made on Foods with Regard to Nutrient Profiles and Health Claims Made on Plants and Their Preparations and of the General Regulatory Framework for Their Use in Foods. SWD(2020) 96 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament. (2005). Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on nutrition and health claims made on foods. Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety. A6-0128/2005 Final.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graeber, D. (2011). Consumption. Current Anthropology, 52(4), 489–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Health Claims Regulation. (2006). Regulation (EC) No1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods. OJ L 404/9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrickx, K. (2019). The Political Space Between Words and Things: Health Claims as Referential Displacement. Science as Culture, 28(4), 427–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennion, A., & Méadel, C. (1989). The Artisans of Desire: The Mediation of Advertising Between Product and Consumer. Sociological Theory, 7(2), 191–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2004). Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern. Critical Inquiry, 30, 225–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurent, B. (2022). European Objects. The Troubled Dreams of Harmonization. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Laurent, B., & Mallard, A. (2020). Labelling the Economy. Qualities and Values in Contemporary Markets. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G. (2000). The Credibility Crisis of Community Regulation. Journal of Common Market Studies, 38(2), 273–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meisterernst. (2013). A New Benchmark for Misleading Advertising. European Food and Feed Law Review, 2, 91–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A. (2008). The Logic of Care. Health and the Problem of Patient Choice. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nestlé, S. A. (2009). The Nestlé Nutrient Profiling System. Nestec Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanabria, E., & Yates-Doerr, E. (2015). Alimentary Uncertainties: From Contested Evidence to Policy. BioSocieties, 10(2), 117–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tetens, I., Oberdörfer, R., Madsen, C., & de Vries, J. (2007). Nutritional Characterisation of Foods: Science-Based Approach to Nutrient Profiling. Summary Report of an ILSI Europe Workshop Held in April 2006. European Journal of Nutrition, 46(Suppl. 2), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valverde, M. (1997). ‘Slavery from Within’: The Invention of Alcoholism and the Question of Free Will. Social History, 22(3), 251–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhagen, H., & van den Berg, H. (2008). A Simple Visual Model to Compare Existing Nutrient Profiling Schemes. Food and Nutrition Research, 52.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kim Hendrickx .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hendrickx, K. (2023). Liberal Food, Liberal Consumers. In: Health Without Bodies. Health, Technology and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4950-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4950-2_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-4949-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-4950-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics