Skip to main content

Effect of Substitution of Fly Ash on the Strength of Geopolymer Concrete

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Engineering Materials (FLAME 2022)

Abstract

Concrete is most often used construction material for infrastructure, which includes structures such as buildings, bridges, roads, dams, and a variety of other structures. To fulfill the increased demand for constructing infrastructure, worldwide output of ordinary Portland cement (OPC) is increasing. This suggests that concrete will continue to be the most widely used construction material for a long time. Cement production consumes a lot of energy and emits a lot of CO2 into the atmosphere. Another ecologically friendly concrete option is to utilize geopolymer, which is an inorganic alumina silicate polymer created from natural or waste resources such as fly ash, which is high in silicon and aluminum. Geopolymer is an inorganic alumina silicate polymer that may be manufactured from natural resources or waste products such as fly ash. This research looked at how various elements impact the mechanical characteristics of concrete and how the concrete mix behaves. To do this, concrete mixtures were created. There are many factors to consider when designing a geopolymer manufactured from fly ash, including how much cement it contains, how much cement it replaces, and how much activator solution it contains. The testing revealed that utilizing a fly ash-based geopolymer instead of fly ash improved the durability of concrete. Concrete with a 50% replacement ratio is more durable than other forms of concrete. It outperforms other kinds of concrete in terms of splitting tensile strength, compressive strength, and flexural strength.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gupta N, Gupta A, Saxena KK, Shukla A, Goyal SK (2021) Mechanical and durability properties of geopolymer concrete composite at varying superplasticizer dosage. Mater Today Proc 44:12–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sharma P, Sharma N, Singh P, Verma M, Parihar HS (2020) Examine the effect of setting time and compressive strength of cement mortar paste using iminodiacetic acid. Mater Today Proc 32:878–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kishore K, Gupta N (2021) Mechanical characterization and assessment of composite geopolymer concrete. Mater Today Proc 44:58–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Parashar AK, Gupta A (2021) Experimental study of the effect of bacillus megaterium bacteria on cement concrete. In: IOP conference series: materials science and engineering, vol 1116, no 1. IOP Publishing, p 012168

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gupta A, Parashar AK (2022) Development of sustainable concrete using slag and calcined clay. In: Proceedings of international conference on innovative technologies for clean and sustainable development (ICITCSD–2021). Springer, Cham, pp 369–377

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sharma N, Sharma P, kr Verma S (2021) Influence of Diatomite on the properties of mortar and concrete: a review. In: IOP conference series: materials science and engineering, vol 1116, no 1. IOP Publishing, p 012174

    Google Scholar 

  7. Parashar AK, Gupta A (2022) Assessment of the impact of Bacillus Cereus Bacteria on strength and water absorption capacity of sustainable concrete. In: Proceedings of international conference on innovative technologies for clean and sustainable development (ICITCSD–2021). Springer, Cham, pp 379–388

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kadapure SA, Kulkarni GS, Prakash KB (2017) A laboratory investigation on the production of sustainable bacteria-blended fly ash concrete. Arab J Sci Eng 42(3):1039–1048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nagar PA, Gupta N, Kishore K, Parashar AK (2021) Coupled effect of B. Sphaericus bacteria and calcined clay mineral on OPC concrete. Mater Today Proc 44:113–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gupta A, Gupta N, Saxena KK, Goyal SK (2021) Investigation of the mechanical strength of stone dust and ceramic waste based composite. Mater Today Proc 44:29–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar Tiwari P, Sharma P, Sharma N, Verma M (2020) An experimental investigation on metakaoline GGBS based concrete with recycled coarse aggregate. Mater Today Proc 40

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gupta N, Kumar P, Mishra A, Srivastava RP (2015) Characterization and application of rice husk ash as pozzolanic material in concrete. IOSR J Mech Civil Eng 12(3):28–32

    Google Scholar 

  13. Praveenkumar S, Sankarasubramanian G (2019) Behavior of high performance fibre reinforced concrete composite beams in flexure. Rev Rom Mater 49(2):259–266

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rajasekar A, Arunachalam K, Kottaisamy M, Saraswathy V (2018) Durability characteristics of ultra high strength concrete with treated sugarcane bagasse ash. Constr Build Mater 171:350–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Achal V, Pan X (2011) Characterization of urease and carbonic anhydrase producing bacteria and their role in calcite precipitation. Curr Microbiol 62(3):894–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kadapure SA, Kulkarni GS, Prakash KB (2019) Study on properties of bacteria-embedded fly ash concrete. Asian J Civil Eng 20(5):627–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mounanga P, Khokhar MIA, El Hachem R, Loukili A (2011) Improvement of the early-age reactivity of fly ash and blast furnace slag cementitious systems using limestone filler. Mater Struct 44(2):437–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. BIS 8112 (2013) BIS 8112: 2013 ordinary portland cement, 43 grade specification. Bur Indian Stand

    Google Scholar 

  19. B. of I. S. (BIS) (1970) IS 383: 1970 specification for coarse and fine aggregates from natural sources for concrete. Indian Stand

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) (1963) IS: 2386 (Part II)—1963: methods of test for aggregates for concrete. Indian Stand

    Google Scholar 

  21. IS:516–1959 (2004) BlJR£AU Indian stand Manak Shavan 9 Bahadtjr Shah Zafar Marg New Delhi 110002. Published online 2004

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arun Kumar Parashar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Parashar, A.K., Sharma, P., Sharma, N. (2024). Effect of Substitution of Fly Ash on the Strength of Geopolymer Concrete. In: Tyagi, R.K., Gupta, P., Das, P., Prakash, R. (eds) Advances in Engineering Materials. FLAME 2022. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4758-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4758-4_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-4757-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-4758-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics