Skip to main content

Streamflow Assessment of Mountainous River Basin Using SWAT Model

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Advances in Civil Engineering (ICSTE 2023)

Abstract

The topography can have a substantial effect on the streamflows of the mountainous river basins. The Sutlej river basin (SRB) is mountainous, often with streamflows affected by its natural topography, which ranges from 443 to 6988 m. The hydrological modeling tools used for streamflow assessment in such river basins should accommodate the elevation differences or bands. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model framework, coupled with the help of Remote Sensing (RS) and Geographical Information System (GIS) capable of fitting the elevation bands in the model. The present study demonstrates the performance of the SWAT model through a statistical performance indicator, namely, Kling-Gupta efficiency (KGE), while assessing the monthly streamflows in the SRB with the consideration of the elevation bands and without them. Optimal model parameters and the level of uncertainty are calibrated through the SUFI-2 algorithm by taking KGE as an objective function. The results obtained with the elevation band use in the SWAT model proved better compared to the model without elevation band use. The model performance statistics, such as KGE, R2, p-bias, and p-factor, show 0.91, 0.83, 2.30, and 0.82, respectively, with the use of elevation band, and 0.21, 0.47, 0.85, and 0.01, respectively, for without the elevation band use in the model, signifies the SWAT model poorly performed without the use of elevation band or natural topography of the river basin. It confirms that the topography shows a significant effect on the streamflows of the mountainous river basins. This work will help the researchers to make them aware of the limitations of the SWAT model use while applying it to the mountainous river basins.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Paul M, Impacts of land use and climate changes on hydrological processes in South Dakota Watersheds

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beven KJ, Warren ROSS, Zaoui JACQUES (1980) SHE: towards a methodology for physically-based distributed forecasting in hydrology. IAHS Publ 129:133–137

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arnold JG, Srinivasan R, Muttiah RS, Williams JR (1998) Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: model development 1. JAWRA J Am Water Resour Assoc 34(1):73–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gascoin S, Kinnard C, Ponce R, Lhermitte S, MacDonell S, Rabatel A (2011) Glacier contribution to streamflow in two headwaters of the Huasco River. Dry Andes Chile Cryosphere 5(4):1099–1113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pelto MS (2015) Quantifying glacier runoff contribution to Nooksack River, WA in 2013–15. In: AGU fall meeting abstracts, vol. 2015. pp C33E-0862

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lian J, Gong H, Li X, Zhao W, Hu Z (2009) Design and development of flood/waterlogging disaster risk model based on Arcobjects. J Geo-Inf Sci 11:376–381

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hartman MD, Baron JS, Lammers RB, Cline DW, Band LE, Liston GE, Tague C (1999) Simulations of snow distribution and hydrology in a mountain basin. Water Resour Res 35(5):1587–1603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fontaine TA, Cruickshank TS, Arnold JG, Hotchkiss RH (2002) Development of a snowfall–snowmelt routine for mountainous terrain for the soil water assessment tool (SWAT). J Hydrol 262(1–4):209–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Abbaspour KC, Rouholahnejad E, Vaghefi S, Srinivasan R, Yang H, Kløve B (2015) A continental-scale hydrology and water quality model for Europe: Calibration and uncertainty of a high-resolution large-scale SWAT model. J Hydrol 524:733–752

    Google Scholar 

  10. Arnold JG, Fohrer N (2005) SWAT2000: current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modelling. Hydrol Process: Int J 19(3):563–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tanasienko AA, Chumbaev AS (2008) Features of snowmelt runoff waters in the Cis-Salair region in an extremely snow-rich hydrological year. Contemp Probl Ecol 1(6):687–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Williams JR (2011) Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation version 2009. Tex Water Resour Inst

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hock R (2003) Temperature index melt modelling in mountain areas. J Hydrol 282(1–4):104–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tahir AA, Chevallier P, Arnaud Y, Neppel L, Ahmad B (2011) Modeling snowmelt-runoff under climate scenarios in the Hunza River basin, Karakoram Range, Northern Pakistan. J Hydrol 409(1–2):104–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gassman PW, Reyes MR, Arnold JG (2005) Review of peer-reviewed literature on the SWAT model. In: Proceeding of the 3rd international SWAT Conference. pp 13–15

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gassman PW, Reyes MR, Green CH, Arnold JG (2007) The soil and water assessment tool: historical development, applications, and future research directions. Trans ASABE 50(4):1211–1250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Monteith JL (1965) Evaporation and environment. In: Symposia of the society for experimental biology, vol 19. Cambridge University Press (CUP) Cambridge, pp 205–234

    Google Scholar 

  18. Khoi DN, Thom VT (2015) Parameter uncertainty analysis for simulating streamflow in a river catchment of Vietnam. Glob Ecol Conserv 4:538–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gupta HV, Kling H, Yilmaz KK (2009) Martinez GF decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modelling. J Hydrol 377:80–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nash JE (1970) Sutcliffe JV river flow forecasting through conceptual models part I-A discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10:282–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Moriasi DN, Arnold JG, Van Liew MW, Bingner RL, Harmel RD, Veith TL (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans ASABE 50(3):885–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Singh P, Jain SK (2002) Snow and glacier melt in the Satluj River at Bhakra Dam in the western Himalayan region. Hydrol Sci J 47(1):93–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Singh P, Jain SK (2003) Modelling of streamflow and its components for a large Himalayan basin with predominant snowmelt yields. Hydrol Sci J 48(2):257–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Paul M, Negahban-Azar M (2018) Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis for streamflow prediction using multiple optimization algorithms and objective functions: San Joaquin Watershed, California Model. Earth Syst Environ 4:1509–1525

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Madhusudana Rao Chintalacheruvu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gogineni, A., Chintalacheruvu, M.R. (2024). Streamflow Assessment of Mountainous River Basin Using SWAT Model. In: Swain, B.P., Dixit, U.S. (eds) Recent Advances in Civil Engineering. ICSTE 2023. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 431. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4665-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4665-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-4664-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-4665-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics