Skip to main content

Metaverse and Decentralization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Metaverse

Part of the book series: Studies in Big Data ((SBD,volume 133))

Abstract

Metaverse is evolving as a structure that provides three-dimensional access with the creation of various virtual worlds using different technologies. The internet has undergone a comprehensive advancement before the formation of the Metaverse. The transition from centralized systems to decentralized systems played the most significant role in the basis of this change. Information security, power, politics, and the economy are the driving forces of interdisciplinary decentralization. Decentralization gained more importance after it became possible with blockchain technology. Blockchain enables decentralized transactions in many areas. The economic dimension of these systems is at a high level, and cryptocurrencies have started to be used within this framework. Decentralized internet is the most essential requirement for these developments. In this process; new structures are being developed that provide more advanced interaction with internet sites with virtual rooms and three-dimensional avatars. New experiments and applications are constantly being carried out on Metaverse. In the information technology age, every trial and application is brought to the attention of users and developers as soon as possible. Decentralization is behind the rapid development of this process. With the elimination of intermediaries, peer-to-peer transactions become possible, and users can realize what cannot be done before using distributed and decentralized network technology. This enables a very high number of system users to be reached in a much shorter time. In this way, many economists believe that the Metaverse market has a potential exceeding a trillion dollars. Metaverse users will want to protect their personal data that is transfered to this environment and the digital assets. In this sense, decentralized systems provide the user and service providers confidence. Web 3.0 will take information-sharing processes to higher levels with smart contracts, crypto assets, and the token economy. In this chapter, the concept of distributed systems and decentralization is examined from an interdisciplinary perspective. The decentralized Metaverse concept is explained by evaluating the opportunities and possible problems of the decentralized systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rajasekhar, D., Babu, M.D., Manjula, R.: Elite capture in decentralised institutions: a literature survey. In: Decentralised Governance, Development Programmes and Elite Capture, pp. 19–29 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Llewellyn Evans, G.: Disruptive technology and the board: the tip of the iceberg. Econ. Bus. Rev. 3(1) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Armstrong, P.: Disruptive Technologies: Understand, Evaluate, Respond. Kogan Page Publishers (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Çevik, K.K., Kayakuş, M.: Estimating the response time of users in the information technologies department with machine learning (Bilişim Teknolojileri Departmaninda Kullanicilarin Taleplerine Cevap Verme Süresinin Makine Öğrenmesi ile Tahmin Edilmesi). Mühendislik Bilimleri ve Tasarım Dergisi 8(3), 728–739 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, S.P.: Fundamentals of Information and Communication Technologies. Cambridge Scholars Publishing (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Özsevinç, N., Yengin, D.: Media literacy in the digital world: Gelişim Evi Sports Club (Dijital Dünyada Medya Okuryazarliği Olgusu: Gelişim Evi Spor Kulübü). Yeni Medya Elektronik Dergisi 5(1), 35–48 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Çokbildik, A.C.: Cyberspace and human rights (Siber Uzay ve İnsan Hakları). Cyberpolitik J 3(5), 133–157 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Khalil, E.A., Özdemir, S.: An overview of the Internet of Things: concept, features, challenges and opportunities (Nesnelerin Internetine Genel Bir Bakış: Kavram, Özellikler, Zorluklar ve Fırsatlar). Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 24(2), 311–326 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tunali, H., Güz, T.: Comparative analysis of information and communication technologies development index and economic growth relationship with panel data models (Bilgi Ve İletişim Teknolojileri Gelişim Endeksi Ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisinin Panel Veri Modelleri Ile Karşılaştırmalı Analizi). İktisadi İdari Ve Siyasal Araştırmalar Dergisi 6(15), 249–261 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Perskaya, V.V., Krasavina, L.N.: The role of supply chain management in competitiveness of information and communication technologies. Int. J. Supply Chain Manag. 8(5), 1102–1113 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sharon, S., Krishnamoorthy, A.R., Salis, V.E.: Design study on actuated traffic control system using Internet of vehicles for smart cities. ECS Trans. 107(1), 19253 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Park, H., Kim, H.S., Park, H.W.: A scientometric study of digital literacy, ICT literacy, information literacy, and media literacy. J. Data Inform. Sci. 6(2), 116–138 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Magazzino, C., Porrini, D., Fusco, G., Schneider, N.: Investigating the link among ICT, electricity consumption, air pollution, and economic growth in EU countries. Energy Sourc. Part B 16(11–12), 976–998 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hashemi, A., Kew, S.N.: The barriers to the use of ICT in English language teaching: a systematic literature review. Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojileri Dergisi 3(1), 77–88 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sha, R., Chow, A.H.: A comparative study of centralised and decentralised architectures for network traffic control. Transp. Plan. Technol. 42(5), 459–469 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yoo, C.S.: Paul Baran, Network theory, and the past, present, and future of the Internet. Colo. Tech. LJ 17, 161 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rowstron, A., Druschel, P.: (2001) Pastry: scalable, decentralized object location, and routing for large-scale peer-to-peer systems. In: IFIP/ACM International Conference on Distributed Systems Platforms and Open Distributed Processing, pp. 329–350. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  18. Arkko, J.: The influence of Internet architecture on centralised versus distributed Internet services. J. Cyber Policy 5(1), 30–45 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mathew, A.J.: The myth of the decentralised internet. Internet Policy Rev. 5(3), 1–16 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Li, D., Liu, W., Deng, L., Qin, B.: Design of multimedia blockchain privacy protection system based on distributed trusted communication. Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol. 32(2), e3938 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Singh, N.K., Mahajan, V.: End-user privacy protection scheme from cyber intrusion in smart grid advanced metering infrastructure. Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct. Prot. 34, 100410 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Davis, L.: Individual and community. In: The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism, pp. 47–69. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pohle, J., Voelsen, D.: Centrality and power. The struggle over the techno‐political configuration of the Internet and the global digital order. Policy Internet 14(1), 13–27 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Edwards, A.: Multi-centred governance and circuits of power in liberal modes of security. Global Crime 17(3–4), 240–263 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Swartz, L.: What was Bitcoin, what will it be? The techno-economic imaginaries of a new money technology. Cult. Stud. 32(4), 623–650 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Dotan, M., Pignolet, Y.A., Schmid, S., Tochner, S., Zohar, A.: Survey on blockchain networking: context, state-of-the-art, challenges. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 54(5), 1–34 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kosmarski, A.: Blockchain adoption in academia: promises and challenges. J. Open Innov.: Technol. Market Complex. 6(4), 117 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Allen, J.G.: Bodies without organs: law, economics, and decentralised governance. Stan. J. Blockchain L. & Pol’y 4, 53 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Crook, M.: Bringing liquidity to the new crypto economy. J. Digit. Bank. 3(3), 279–287 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Brekke, J.K.: Hacker-engineers and their economies: the political economy of decentralised networks and ‘cryptoeconomics.’ New Polit. Econ. 26(4), 646–659 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nakamoto, S.: Re: Bitcoin P2P e-cash paper. In: The Cryptography Mailing List, pp. 1–2 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Fernandez-Carames, T.M., Fraga-Lamas, P.: Towards post-quantum blockchain: a review on blockchain cryptography resistant to quantum computing attacks. IEEE Access 8, 21091–21116 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Karaarslan, E., Birim, M.: Fundamentals of secure and reliable application development in blockchain (Blokzincirde Güvenli ve Güvenilir Uygulama Geliştirme Temelleri), Siber Güvenlik ve Savunma: Blokzinciri ve Kriptografi, pp. 1–48. Nobel Yayınevi (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Benet, J.: Ipfs-content addressed, versioned, p2p file system (2014). arXiv preprint arXiv:1407.3561

  35. Karaarslan, E., Konacaklı, E.: Data storage in the decentralized world: blockchain and derivatives. In: Gülseven, S., Akadal, E., Kumar Sharma, S. (eds.) Who Runs the World: Data, pp. 37–69 (2020). https://iupress.istanbul.edu.tr/tr/book/who-runs-the-world-data/home

  36. Molina-Jiménez, C., Sfyrakis, I., Song, L., Nakib, H.D.A., Crowcroft, J.: The benefits of deploying smart contracts on trusted third parties (2020). arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.12981

  37. Medium: Coin burning: What is and how does it work? (2022) https://medium.com/@cryptoaims/coin-burning-what-is-and-how-does-it-work-f0ade73dcb46. Accessed 18 June 2022

    Google Scholar 

  38. Voshmgir, S.: Token Economy: How the Web3 reinvents the Internet, Shermin Voshmgir, BlockchainHub Berlin, 2nd edn (2020). ISBN: 3982103819

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wang, Q., Li, R., Wang, Q., Chen, S.: Non-fungible token (NFT): overview, evaluation, opportunities and challenges (2021). arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.07447

  40. Gogel, D., Kremer, B., Slavin, A, Werbach. K.: Decentralized autonomous organizations: beyond the hype. WEF White Paper (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Karaarslan, E., Adiguzel, E.: Blockchain based DNS and PKI solutions. IEEE Commun. Stand. Mag. 2(3), 52–57 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Nelson, J.: ‘Snow Crash’ author Neal Stephenson is building a ‘Free Metaverse’ Called Lamina1 (2022). https://decrypt-co.cdn.ampproject.org/c/s/decrypt.co/102646/snow-crash-author-neal-stephenson-is-building-a-free-Metaverse-called-lamina1

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enis Karaarslan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Karaarslan, E., Yazici Yilmaz, S. (2023). Metaverse and Decentralization. In: Esen, F.S., Tinmaz, H., Singh, M. (eds) Metaverse. Studies in Big Data, vol 133. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4641-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics