Abstract
Since the history of humanity met the concept of democracy, the content, applications, and results of the concept have been the subject of discussion. In times when technological possibilities were limited, the behavior of the individual, the transfer of the right of representation for the construction of power, and the participation of citizens in the administration as a part of the balance and control mechanisms in the use of power were the basis of the debates on democracy. However, with the development of technology, in today's world, the options in front of citizens and the meaning of citizenship began to change. Now, the existence of the individual's trans-humanized existence in interaction with technologies such as artificial intelligence and the internet of things, in the real world and especially in virtual worlds such as the Metaverse, and the combinations that he will create with other individuals and collectivities, are on the verge of gaining the potential to reach an unexpected disruptiveness interactively both in the real world and in the virtual world. Against these, the renewal of the concepts of law, state, and power with a dynamic understanding is closely related to the redefinition of citizenship in the face of formations such as the Metaverse. This chapter will focus on the essential elements of an introductory framework for the future of citizens in this new world through the relationship of political history with disruptive technologies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Albrow, M.: The global age: State and society beyond modernity. Stanf. Univ. Press. (1997)
Boucher, D., Kelly, P.: The social contract and its critics. In The social contract from Hobbes to Rawls (pp. 11–44). Routledge. (2003)
Balibar, E.: The nation form: history and ideology. Review (Fernand Braudel Center), 329–361. (1990)
Ercan, S.A., Gagnon, J.P.: The crisis of democracy: Which crisis? Which democracy? Democr. Theory 1(2), 1–10 (2014)
Bloom, P., Sancino, A.: Disruptive democracy: The clash between techno-populism and techno-democracy. Sage. (2019)
Toots, M.: Why E-participation systems fail: The case of Estonia's Osale. ee. Gov.Ment Inf. Q., 36(3), 546–559. (2019)
Calzada, I.: Digital citizenship regimes rescaling Nation-States?. In emerging digital citizenship regimes (pp. 23–55). Emerald Publ. Lte. (2022)
Fukuyama, F.: Against identity politics: the new tribalism and the crisis of democracy. Foreign Aff. 97, 90 (2018)
Fontanel, J. GAFAM, a progress and a danger for civilization. In Financial Architecture; Forced Economic Development in the Context of External Shocks and Internal Inconsistencies. (2019)
Sayın, Ö., Şahin, S. Z.: Kindness more contagious than viruses: an inclusive and innovative response to inequalities in ankara. In Volume 4: Policy and Planning (pp. 111–120). Bristol Univ. Press. (2021)
Schou, J., Hjelholt, M.: Digital state spaces: state rescaling and advanced digitalization. Territory, Politics, Governance 7(4), 438–454 (2019)
Sadowski, J.: When data is capital: Datafication, accumulation, and extraction. Big. Data Soc. 6(1), 2053951718820549 (2019)
Turner, C.: Augmented reality, augmented epistemology, and the Real-World Web. Philos. & Technol., 35(1), 1–28. . (2022)
Pew Research Center. The Future of Digital Spaces and Their Role in Democracy”,https://www.elon.edu/u/imagining/wp-content/uploads/sites/964/2021/11/Future-Social-Media-Democracy-In-2035-Elon-University-Pew-Research-2021.pdf (2021)
De Zwart, M., Lindsay, D.: Governance and the global Metaverse. In the Real and the Virtual: Critical Issues in Cybercultures (pp. 171–182). Brill. (2009)
Brownsword, R.: Law, authority, and respect: three waves of technological disruption, pp. 1–36. Law, Innovation and Technology (2022)
Rowland, D.: Virtual world, real rights?’: Human rights and the internet. In Emerging Areas of Human Rights in the 21st Century (pp. 17–33). Routledge. (2012)
Nabben, K.: Building the Metaverse: ‘crypto states’ and corporates compete, down to the hardware. Available at SSRN. (2021)
Hinrichs, R. Avatars as the first manifestation of geo-politically unconstrained global citizens. J. Virtual Worlds Res., 4(2). (2011)
Dick, E.: Public policy for the metaverse: Key Takeaways from the 2021 AR/VR Policy Conference. Information Technology and Innovation Foundation. (2021)
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Baabdullah, A. M., Ribeiro-Navarrete, S., Giannakis, M., Al-Debei, M. M., Wamba, S. F.: Metaverse beyond the hype: Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice, and policy. Int. J. Inf. Manag., 66, 102542. (2022)
Calongne, C., Sheehy, P., Stricker, A.: Gemeinschaft Identity in a Gesellschaft Metaverse. In: Teigland, R., Power, D. (eds) The Immersive Internet. Palgrave Macmillan, London. (2013)
Talmon, N., Shapiro, E. Foundations for Grassroots Democratic Metaverse. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.04090. https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.04090 (2022)
Heimans, J., Timms, H.: Understanding, “new power.” Harv. Bus. Rev. 92(12), 48–56 (2014)
Arnstein, S.R.: A ladder of citizen participation. J. Am. Inst. Plann. 35(4), 216–224 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137283023_16
Miessen, M. Katılım Kabusu. Metis. Publishing. (2013)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Şahin, S.Z. (2023). Citizenship and Citizen Participation in Metaverse. In: Esen, F.S., Tinmaz, H., Singh, M. (eds) Metaverse. Studies in Big Data, vol 133. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4641-9_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4641-9_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-4640-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-4641-9
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)